Hello,
I hope you guys can help me. I recently made an ad in adobe illustrator
which has a greyscale image with an orange to transparent gradient on
top made by creating an opacity mask. Well on the screen it looks fine
and so I sent it to the comercial printer. However when the comercial
printer gave us the proof it shows a sort of lighter hue band in the
area where the orange gradient ends and meets with the grey image
below. In other words, instead of the gradient blending smoothly with
the grey image below (as it shows on screen!) there is like a lighter
strip that just almost ends abrouptly and looks bad where the gradient
ends.
This same thing had happened to me with almost the same ad in the same
place when I took it to Kinkos to print. However this time the gradient
and the greyscale image were one rasterized bitmap image exported from
photoshop. The guy in kinkos was telling me that it is a problem that
appears because the image has an area of just k and sudddenly it goes
to color and it not always goes smoothly. Well I told him that in my
printer at my office that didn't come up, but he told me again about
the k to color problem which was odd to me because this time it was
just one image like a photo so I don't see how that could be my
problem. Anyways I suggested he try printing it from another printer
there at kinkos and he did and this time it came out without any
problems. So that solved it that time.
But my current case is that the proof from the comercial printing is
showing this band again, so my question to you all is this: Is this a
problem that the Comercial printer should solve or is there something I
can do to correct this in the illustrator file?
Any help/suggestions will be really appreciated.
Thanks,
Aluxe
<[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
news:[Email Removed]...
| QUOTE |
| Hello, I hope you guys can help me. I recently made an ad in adobe illustrator which has a greyscale image with an orange to transparent gradient on top made by creating an opacity mask. Well on the screen it looks fine and so I sent it to the comercial printer. However when the comercial printer gave us the proof it shows a sort of lighter hue band in the area where the orange gradient ends and meets with the grey image below. In other words, instead of the gradient blending smoothly with the grey image below (as it shows on screen!) there is like a lighter strip that just almost ends abrouptly and looks bad where the gradient ends. This same thing had happened to me with almost the same ad in the same place when I took it to Kinkos to print. However this time the gradient and the greyscale image were one rasterized bitmap image exported from photoshop. The guy in kinkos was telling me that it is a problem that appears because the image has an area of just k and sudddenly it goes to color and it not always goes smoothly. Well I told him that in my printer at my office that didn't come up, but he told me again about the k to color problem which was odd to me because this time it was just one image like a photo so I don't see how that could be my problem. Anyways I suggested he try printing it from another printer there at kinkos and he did and this time it came out without any problems. So that solved it that time. But my current case is that the proof from the comercial printing is showing this band again, so my question to you all is this: Is this a problem that the Comercial printer should solve or is there something I can do to correct this in the illustrator file? Any help/suggestions will be really appreciated. Thanks, Aluxe |
Aluxe,
A former friend of mine used to work at a Kinko's in Philly as a "graphic
designer" there. He still is a very talented designer. To get to the point,
he would tell me about the total lack of skill of the "designers who worked
with him. He even told me that Kinko's was for amateurs and off the street
work. So, Kinko's is not a commercial printer. It's nothing more than a
glorified quick printer. In fact, UPS has taken them over and done away with
most of the printing. Please take your work to a real commercial printer.
They know what they're doing.
Good luck for the next time,
Stu
<[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
news:[Email Removed]...
| QUOTE |
| Hello, I hope you guys can help me. I recently made an ad in adobe illustrator which has a greyscale image with an orange to transparent gradient on top made by creating an opacity mask. Well on the screen it looks fine and so I sent it to the comercial printer. However when the comercial printer gave us the proof it shows a sort of lighter hue band in the area where the orange gradient ends and meets with the grey image below. In other words, instead of the gradient blending smoothly with the grey image below (as it shows on screen!) there is like a lighter strip that just almost ends abrouptly and looks bad where the gradient ends. This same thing had happened to me with almost the same ad in the same place when I took it to Kinkos to print. However this time the gradient and the greyscale image were one rasterized bitmap image exported from photoshop. The guy in kinkos was telling me that it is a problem that appears because the image has an area of just k and sudddenly it goes to color and it not always goes smoothly. Well I told him that in my printer at my office that didn't come up, but he told me again about the k to color problem which was odd to me because this time it was just one image like a photo so I don't see how that could be my problem. Anyways I suggested he try printing it from another printer there at kinkos and he did and this time it came out without any problems. So that solved it that time. But my current case is that the proof from the comercial printing is showing this band again, so my question to you all is this: Is this a problem that the Comercial printer should solve or is there something I can do to correct this in the illustrator file? Any help/suggestions will be really appreciated. Thanks, Aluxe |
[Email Removed] wrote:
| QUOTE |
| Hello, I hope you guys can help me. I recently made an ad in adobe illustrator which has a greyscale image with an orange to transparent gradient on top made by creating an opacity mask. Well on the screen it looks fine and so I sent it to the comercial printer. However when the comercial printer gave us the proof it shows a sort of lighter hue band in the area where the orange gradient ends and meets with the grey image below. In other words, instead of the gradient blending smoothly with the grey image below (as it shows on screen!) there is like a lighter strip that just almost ends abrouptly and looks bad where the gradient ends. This same thing had happened to me with almost the same ad in the same place when I took it to Kinkos to print. However this time the gradient and the greyscale image were one rasterized bitmap image exported from photoshop. The guy in kinkos was telling me that it is a problem that appears because the image has an area of just k and sudddenly it goes to color and it not always goes smoothly. Well I told him that in my printer at my office that didn't come up, but he told me again about the k to color problem which was odd to me because this time it was just one image like a photo so I don't see how that could be my problem. Anyways I suggested he try printing it from another printer there at kinkos and he did and this time it came out without any problems. So that solved it that time. But my current case is that the proof from the comercial printing is showing this band again, so my question to you all is this: Is this a problem that the Comercial printer should solve or is there something I can do to correct this in the illustrator file? Any help/suggestions will be really appreciated. |
It would be helpful to know what type of printer it is. Is it a laser
printer? And it would also help to know what type of file you are
providing - CMYK? Third, are you using a custom profile to generate the
CMYK file, or leaving this to Kinkos.
Few people would provide even a guess without knowing both of these, but der
Curvemeister loves to step across the plate and swing at pitches like this
one, so here goes.
If the answer to both of these is yes, then look at the K plate and look for
a loss of density or other banding at the point in question. Since the
problem involves orange, look carefully at the Y plate - monitors are poor
at representing light, saturated yellows. Whichever channel the problem is
in, a good way to hide the transition is by adding a strategic amount of
noise.
Anopther possibility: custom profiles are a famous source of gratuitous
banding - get hold of the profile in question and run it on some gradients,
and see if it introduces its own banding.
--
Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com
Stuart B. Henlis wrote:
| QUOTE |
| So, Kinko's is not a commercial printer. It's nothing more than a glorified quick printer. |
I think my story was kind of confusing, the proof I got was from a real
comercial printer and I mentioned Kinko's because this same thing had
happened to me about a month ago also with Kinkos. But my current
problem is happening with a real comercial printer, so is that
something they should fix?
Mike thanks a lot for all your suggestions. About which printer it is,
I don't know, it is a comercial printing not Kinkos. Like I was telling
Stuart I only mentioned Kinkos because the same thing happened to me
about a month ago at Kinkos, however my problem now is coming from the
proof that I am getting from the comercial printer.
Now as to your questions, the orange gradient I am making is a pantone
color and the bitmap image below is cmyk. What you are suggesting about
checking the K plate, is it something I should check in adobe
illustrator or something that the comercial printer people should be
resolving? And could you explain me a bit more about the adding noise
part? Is this something I have to do or the printer? Thanks very much
for all your help.
I don't know, it is a comercial printing not Kinkos. Like I was telling
Stuart I only mentioned Kinkos because the same thing happened to me
about a month ago at Kinkos, however my problem now is coming from the
proof that I am getting from the comercial printer.
Now as to your questions, the orange gradient I am making is a pantone
color and the bitmap image below is cmyk. What you are suggesting about
checking the K plate, is it something I should check in adobe
illustrator or something that the comercial printer people should be
resolving? And could you explain me a bit more about the adding noise
part? Is this something I have to do or the printer? Thanks very much
for all your help.
<[Email Removed]> wrote:
| QUOTE |
| Hello, I hope you guys can help me. I recently made an ad in adobe illustrator which has a greyscale image with an orange to transparent gradient on top made by creating an opacity mask. Well on the screen it looks fine |
Not being an Illustrator expert it's hard for me to understand this. You
have an orange to transparent gradient? What does this mean? It's opaque
at one end and becomes transparent at the other? That implies some sort
of graphic mobius strip. At what point does it cease to be transparent?
How would the program decide where to put that point? Do you mean you
have an orange gradient on top of a grayscale image that is transparent?
Like an orange that overprints a grayscale image?
| QUOTE |
| and so I sent it to the comercial printer. However when the comercial printer gave us the proof it shows a sort of lighter hue band in the area where the orange gradient ends and meets with the grey image below. In other words, instead of the gradient blending smoothly with the grey image below (as it shows on screen!) there is like a lighter strip that just almost ends abrouptly and looks bad where the gradient ends. |
Ah, I think the fog is clearing. You want the grayscale image to fade
into the orange blend, decreasing density as it approaches the solid
part of the orange blend. Am I right? And then the orange blend
overprints the grayscale?
But one issue I'm not clear on. How many colors is this job supposed to
be? Is it a two color job with Black + Orange? Is it CMYK? Is it CMYK
+Spot? These details are very important in how to address this problem.
| QUOTE |
This same thing had happened to me with almost the same ad in the same place when I took it to Kinkos to print. However this time the gradient and the greyscale image were one rasterized bitmap image exported from photoshop. The guy in kinkos was telling me that it is a problem that appears because the image has an area of just k and sudddenly it goes to color and it not always goes smoothly. Well I told him that in my printer at my office that didn't come up, but he told me again about the k to color problem which was odd to me because this time it was just one image like a photo so I don't see how that could be my problem. Anyways I suggested he try printing it from another printer there at kinkos and he did and this time it came out without any problems. So that solved it that time. |
What kind of printer was used? Was one a Postcript printer and one not?
That would created very different results since one would use the screen
drawing mechanism and one would use Postscript. A very common problem we
experience with people who own inkjet printers but don't invest in
Postscript rips. Keep in mind the world of commercial printing is based
on Postscript/Acrobat. No devices in commercial printing use the
computers windowing mechanism to render images.
| QUOTE |
But my current case is that the proof from the comercial printing is showing this band again, so my question to you all is this: Is this a problem that the Comercial printer should solve or is there something I can do to correct this in the illustrator file? Any help/suggestions will be really appreciated. |
Iluustrator warns about using spot colors with transparency but it has a
check box that says "don't show this dialog again" which most people
check and then forget about it.
The solution to your problem (or statement that there is no solution)
requires that we know about the color of the document.
1) Black plus spot
2) CMYK
3) CMYK plus spot.
I would have to know the answer to really know what to tell you.
Even how to proof it depends on the answer to that question. You might
be experiencing a problem where a CMYK proofer is trying to simulate
spot colors and the final output will be fine. I don't know.
How many colors is the job supposed to be?
Well, I'm far from being an expert, but the first thing I would check would
be the color profile. You might have to try a couple of different ones. If
you work with a regular printer, check with them for recommended settings.
It's best to work with one or two printers so you know how they work. No two
bureaus are going to print exactly like each other.
You might also add just a touch of gausian blur after you build the
gradient. That tends to soften the transition and reduces banding,
especially if you're going to a small laser printer.
Skywolf.
"Lee Blevins" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:1gy6q8x.17kuagb1huvsfaN%[Email Removed]...
be the color profile. You might have to try a couple of different ones. If
you work with a regular printer, check with them for recommended settings.
It's best to work with one or two printers so you know how they work. No two
bureaus are going to print exactly like each other.
You might also add just a touch of gausian blur after you build the
gradient. That tends to soften the transition and reduces banding,
especially if you're going to a small laser printer.
Skywolf.
"Lee Blevins" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:1gy6q8x.17kuagb1huvsfaN%[Email Removed]...
| QUOTE |
| <[Email Removed]> wrote: Hello, I hope you guys can help me. I recently made an ad in adobe illustrator which has a greyscale image with an orange to transparent gradient on top made by creating an opacity mask. Well on the screen it looks fine Not being an Illustrator expert it's hard for me to understand this. You have an orange to transparent gradient? What does this mean? It's opaque at one end and becomes transparent at the other? That implies some sort of graphic mobius strip. At what point does it cease to be transparent? How would the program decide where to put that point? Do you mean you have an orange gradient on top of a grayscale image that is transparent? Like an orange that overprints a grayscale image? and so I sent it to the comercial printer. However when the comercial printer gave us the proof it shows a sort of lighter hue band in the area where the orange gradient ends and meets with the grey image below. In other words, instead of the gradient blending smoothly with the grey image below (as it shows on screen!) there is like a lighter strip that just almost ends abrouptly and looks bad where the gradient ends. Ah, I think the fog is clearing. You want the grayscale image to fade into the orange blend, decreasing density as it approaches the solid part of the orange blend. Am I right? And then the orange blend overprints the grayscale? But one issue I'm not clear on. How many colors is this job supposed to be? Is it a two color job with Black + Orange? Is it CMYK? Is it CMYK +Spot? These details are very important in how to address this problem. This same thing had happened to me with almost the same ad in the same place when I took it to Kinkos to print. However this time the gradient and the greyscale image were one rasterized bitmap image exported from photoshop. The guy in kinkos was telling me that it is a problem that appears because the image has an area of just k and sudddenly it goes to color and it not always goes smoothly. Well I told him that in my printer at my office that didn't come up, but he told me again about the k to color problem which was odd to me because this time it was just one image like a photo so I don't see how that could be my problem. Anyways I suggested he try printing it from another printer there at kinkos and he did and this time it came out without any problems. So that solved it that time. What kind of printer was used? Was one a Postcript printer and one not? That would created very different results since one would use the screen drawing mechanism and one would use Postscript. A very common problem we experience with people who own inkjet printers but don't invest in Postscript rips. Keep in mind the world of commercial printing is based on Postscript/Acrobat. No devices in commercial printing use the computers windowing mechanism to render images. But my current case is that the proof from the comercial printing is showing this band again, so my question to you all is this: Is this a problem that the Comercial printer should solve or is there something I can do to correct this in the illustrator file? Any help/suggestions will be really appreciated. Iluustrator warns about using spot colors with transparency but it has a check box that says "don't show this dialog again" which most people check and then forget about it. The solution to your problem (or statement that there is no solution) requires that we know about the color of the document. 1) Black plus spot 2) CMYK 3) CMYK plus spot. I would have to know the answer to really know what to tell you. Even how to proof it depends on the answer to that question. You might be experiencing a problem where a CMYK proofer is trying to simulate spot colors and the final output will be fine. I don't know. How many colors is the job supposed to be? |
| QUOTE |
| Mike thanks a lot for all your suggestions. About which printer it is, I don't know, it is a comercial printing not Kinkos. Like I was telling Stuart I only mentioned Kinkos because the same thing happened to me about a month ago at Kinkos, however my problem now is coming from the proof that I am getting from the comercial printer. Now as to your questions, the orange gradient I am making is a pantone color and the bitmap image below is cmyk. What you are suggesting about checking the K plate, is it something I should check in adobe illustrator or something that the comercial printer people should be resolving? And could you explain me a bit more about the adding noise part? Is this something I have to do or the printer? Thanks very much for all your help. I would guess that the proof (method of proof) is where the problem lies. It |
sounds like the digital proofing used has limitations as to fine degrees of
output, specially so far as converting the gradient to such a light colour.
I would bet that final output from RIP (for press) will be ok. Just my 2
cents.
Keith.
In article <[Email Removed]>,
[Email Removed] wrote:
[Email Removed] wrote:
| QUOTE |
| I hope you guys can help me. I recently made an ad in adobe illustrator which has a greyscale image with an orange to transparent gradient on top made by creating an opacity mask. Well on the screen it looks fine and so I sent it to the comercial printer. However when the comercial printer gave us the proof it shows a sort of lighter hue band in the area where the orange gradient ends and meets with the grey image below. In other words, instead of the gradient blending smoothly with the grey image below (as it shows on screen!) there is like a lighter strip that just almost ends abrouptly and looks bad where the gradient ends. |
I think I know exactly what you're talking about. If so, what you are
seeing is an optical illusion; the "stripe" at the end of the gradient
appears because the gradient ends abruptly and the human eye has a trait
called "lateral inhibition," which exaggerates edges in a way similar to
the way unsharp masking works.
I have had similar problems with Quark and Illustrator created gradients
which end at an image. The solution? Create the gradient in Photoshop,
which will add a small amount of noise to dither the gradient, which
helps get rid of the appearance of the bright "stripe" or line where it
ends. (Your inkjet print does not shop this optical illusion in part
because it, too, uses dithering to produce color.)
--
Art, photography, shareware, polyamory, literature, kink:
all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
On 6/15/05 4:35 AM, [Email Removed] uttered:
| QUOTE |
| Now as to your questions, the orange gradient I am making is a pantone color and the bitmap image below is cmyk. What you are suggesting about checking the K plate, is it something I should check in adobe illustrator or something that the comercial printer people should be resolving? And could you explain me a bit more about the adding noise part? Is this something I have to do or the printer? Thanks very much for all your help. |
As to your responsibility question, the printer should atleast be able to
tell you how to fix the problem. You should be communicating with the
printer's prepress department before creating/submitting your files. How can
you produce a file properly when you don't know if it's laser, offset, web,
inkjet, etc? How are they outputting the proof?
I'm still confused by the rest and am not an expert either. Is the job
running as 2 spot colors or as CMYK. I'll ask these questions and let the
prepress guys provide solutions.
Are you working with color management on, and if so, do your Photoshop (if
that is the source of the grayscale image) and Illustrator settings match?
Printing as Spot or CMYK?
Is your Pantone orange set to Spot?
Is your placed grayscale image saved as CMYK or grayscale?
Does your Opacity Mask involve a blending mode/percentage?
Before you created the Opacity Mask, was the orange a gradient? If so, was
it made with values like Pantone Orange 100% to Pantone Orange 0%; or how?
Have you tried Flattening Transparency to see the results on screen?
What version of Illustrator?
Are you submitting a native Illustrator file or EPS or what?
Can you upload a PNG or JPG of the file to a web page for the experts to
view?
These may not be all the applicable questions, but I think it's enough to
give the prepress group clues to the problem so they don't have to guess.
inez
I just want to thank all you people for the amazing amount of USEFUL
information and tips that you provided. I mentioned some of this to the
printer and they got back to me saying that they had figured it out.
Thanks again very much for everyones help.
Aluxe
information and tips that you provided. I mentioned some of this to the
printer and they got back to me saying that they had figured it out.
Thanks again very much for everyones help.
Aluxe
<aluxelocochon@
| I just want to thank all you people for the amazing amount of USEFUL
| information and tips that you provided. I mentioned some of this to the
| printer and they got back to me saying that they had figured it out.
|
| Thanks again very much for everyones help.
|
Care to share the solution?
| I just want to thank all you people for the amazing amount of USEFUL
| information and tips that you provided. I mentioned some of this to the
| printer and they got back to me saying that they had figured it out.
|
| Thanks again very much for everyones help.
|
Care to share the solution?
I'm with Keith, I think it is a proofing detail. Before spinning my
wheels working on a new file, I would get the printers opinion on why
it proofed that way. Since you are going to the expense to print 5
colors order a high-resolution proof if they are CTP, if not and they
are using film get a blueline and matchprint.
JAK
[Email Removed] wrote:
wheels working on a new file, I would get the printers opinion on why
it proofed that way. Since you are going to the expense to print 5
colors order a high-resolution proof if they are CTP, if not and they
are using film get a blueline and matchprint.
JAK
[Email Removed] wrote:
| QUOTE |
| Hello, I hope you guys can help me. I recently made an ad in adobe illustrator which has a greyscale image with an orange to transparent gradient on top made by creating an opacity mask. Well on the screen it looks fine and so I sent it to the comercial printer. However when the comercial printer gave us the proof it shows a sort of lighter hue band in the area where the orange gradient ends and meets with the grey image below. In other words, instead of the gradient blending smoothly with the grey image below (as it shows on screen!) there is like a lighter strip that just almost ends abrouptly and looks bad where the gradient ends. This same thing had happened to me with almost the same ad in the same place when I took it to Kinkos to print. However this time the gradient and the greyscale image were one rasterized bitmap image exported from photoshop. The guy in kinkos was telling me that it is a problem that appears because the image has an area of just k and sudddenly it goes to color and it not always goes smoothly. Well I told him that in my printer at my office that didn't come up, but he told me again about the k to color problem which was odd to me because this time it was just one image like a photo so I don't see how that could be my problem. Anyways I suggested he try printing it from another printer there at kinkos and he did and this time it came out without any problems. So that solved it that time. But my current case is that the proof from the comercial printing is showing this band again, so my question to you all is this: Is this a problem that the Comercial printer should solve or is there something I can do to correct this in the illustrator file? Any help/suggestions will be really appreciated. Thanks, Aluxe |
I thought I would add my twopenneth.
Did you infor the commercial printer that you had used transparency? There
are lots of ways to RIP a file, maybe you could ask him to work out a way it
could work?
Dean
<[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
Did you infor the commercial printer that you had used transparency? There
are lots of ways to RIP a file, maybe you could ask him to work out a way it
could work?
Dean
<[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
| QUOTE |
| Hello, I hope you guys can help me. I recently made an ad in adobe illustrator which has a greyscale image with an orange to transparent gradient on top made by creating an opacity mask. Well on the screen it looks fine and so I sent it to the comercial printer. However when the comercial printer gave us the proof it shows a sort of lighter hue band in the area where the orange gradient ends and meets with the grey image below. In other words, instead of the gradient blending smoothly with the grey image below (as it shows on screen!) there is like a lighter strip that just almost ends abrouptly and looks bad where the gradient ends. This same thing had happened to me with almost the same ad in the same place when I took it to Kinkos to print. However this time the gradient and the greyscale image were one rasterized bitmap image exported from photoshop. The guy in kinkos was telling me that it is a problem that appears because the image has an area of just k and sudddenly it goes to color and it not always goes smoothly. Well I told him that in my printer at my office that didn't come up, but he told me again about the k to color problem which was odd to me because this time it was just one image like a photo so I don't see how that could be my problem. Anyways I suggested he try printing it from another printer there at kinkos and he did and this time it came out without any problems. So that solved it that time. But my current case is that the proof from the comercial printing is showing this band again, so my question to you all is this: Is this a problem that the Comercial printer should solve or is there something I can do to correct this in the illustrator file? Any help/suggestions will be really appreciated. Thanks, Aluxe |
Hello everyone, the comercial printer said they solved the problem, I
am trying to find out what exactly they did.
am trying to find out what exactly they did.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.