Fluffy Convict
Jun 9 2005, 07:35 PM
In my school's website, I've found a regex that scans files for
functions which name's end with "_ding". On a match, it scans the
JavaDoc style comment of the function and filers out any @user comments.
Perhaps the following example will explain this better:
---------------------------- PHP: -----------------------------
preg_match_all(
";
/** #Comment start
(?P<Comment>.*?) #Comment contents
*/ #End of the comment
s*
functions+(?P<Function>[a-z0-9_]*_ding) #Function name
;xim",
$file,
$matches,
PREG_SET_ORDER
);
---------------------------------------------------------------
Let's assume $file is scanned with this regex and $file contains the
following function:
/**
* @description This is for internal use
* @user This is to inform the user
*/
function foo_ding() {
return 'foo!';
}
Then the output of the rexex would be "This is to inform the user". Now
my problem. It's really quite simple I imagine for somebody with more
regex experience than I have. I now want to match functions that START
with ding_ and not end with it. So the regex should match
/**
* @user Inform the user
*/
function ding_foo() {
return 'foo you too!'
}
Who knows how to rebuild the regex? I've tried the code here under, but
It failt to return the whole function name. $matches['Function'] returns
"ding_f" instead of "ding_foo". Who can help me rewrite this regex
properly? Your help would be greatly appreciated!
---------------------------- PHP: -----------------------------
preg_match_all(
";
/** #Comment start
(?P<Comment>.*?) #Comment contents
*/ #End of the comment
s*
functions+(?P<Function>ding_*[a-z0-9_]) #Function name
;xim",
$file,
$matches,
PREG_SET_ORDER
);
---------------------------------------------------------------
Xenophaw
Jun 11 2005, 12:05 PM
"Fluffy Convict" <[Email Removed]> wrote:
QUOTE |
In my school's website, I've found a regex that scans files for functions which name's end with "_ding". On a match, it scans the JavaDoc style comment of the function and filers out any @user comments.
Perhaps the following example will explain this better:
---------------------------- PHP: ----------------------------- preg_match_all( "; /** #Comment start (?P<Comment>.*?) #Comment contents */ #End of the comment s* functions+(?P<Function>[a-z0-9_]*_ding) #Function name ;xim", $file, $matches, PREG_SET_ORDER ); ---------------------------------------------------------------
Let's assume $file is scanned with this regex and $file contains the following function:
/** * @description This is for internal use * @user This is to inform the user */ function foo_ding() { return 'foo!'; }
Then the output of the rexex would be "This is to inform the user". Now my problem. It's really quite simple I imagine for somebody with more regex experience than I have. I now want to match functions that START with ding_ and not end with it. So the regex should match
/** * @user Inform the user */ function ding_foo() { return 'foo you too!' }
Who knows how to rebuild the regex? I've tried the code here under, but It failt to return the whole function name. $matches['Function'] returns "ding_f" instead of "ding_foo". Who can help me rewrite this regex properly? Your help would be greatly appreciated!
---------------------------- PHP: ----------------------------- preg_match_all( "; /** #Comment start (?P<Comment>.*?) #Comment contents */ #End of the comment s* functions+(?P<Function>ding_*[a-z0-9_]) #Function name
|
Here it's the mistake. I think you would need ding_[a-z0-9]*. The pattern
you wrote would matches 'ding' followed by 0 or more '_' and a character
between a to z and 0 to 9. If you don't mind to catch any function name like
ding_, i would use ding_[a-z0-9]+, which search for at least 1 character
after the '_'.
I hope this will help you.
QUOTE |
;xim", $file, $matches, PREG_SET_ORDER ); --------------------------------------------------------------- |
Fluffy Convict
Jun 12 2005, 10:26 AM
Xenophaw wrote:
QUOTE |
"Fluffy Convict" <[Email Removed]> wrote:
In my school's website, I've found a regex that scans files for functions which name's end with "_ding". On a match, it scans the JavaDoc style comment of the function and filers out any @user comments.
Perhaps the following example will explain this better:
---------------------------- PHP: ----------------------------- preg_match_all( "; /** #Comment start (?P<Comment>.*?) #Comment contents */ #End of the comment s* functions+(?P<Function>[a-z0-9_]*_ding) #Function name ;xim", $file, $matches, PREG_SET_ORDER ); ---------------------------------------------------------------
Let's assume $file is scanned with this regex and $file contains the following function:
/** * @description This is for internal use * @user This is to inform the user */ function foo_ding() { return 'foo!'; }
Then the output of the rexex would be "This is to inform the user". Now my problem. It's really quite simple I imagine for somebody with more regex experience than I have. I now want to match functions that START with ding_ and not end with it. So the regex should match
/** * @user Inform the user */ function ding_foo() { return 'foo you too!' }
Who knows how to rebuild the regex? I've tried the code here under, but It failt to return the whole function name. $matches['Function'] returns "ding_f" instead of "ding_foo". Who can help me rewrite this regex properly? Your help would be greatly appreciated!
---------------------------- PHP: ----------------------------- preg_match_all( "; /** #Comment start (?P<Comment>.*?) #Comment contents */ #End of the comment s* functions+(?P<Function>ding_*[a-z0-9_]) #Function name
Here it's the mistake. I think you would need ding_[a-z0-9]*. The pattern you wrote would matches 'ding' followed by 0 or more '_' and a character between a to z and 0 to 9. If you don't mind to catch any function name like ding_, i would use ding_[a-z0-9]+, which search for at least 1 character after the '_'.
I hope this will help you.
;xim", $file, $matches, PREG_SET_ORDER ); ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
Thanx, Xenophaw! That really dit the trick. I'm not quite there with my
regex knowledge...but practice makes perfect :)