www.douglassdavis.com
Jun 27 2005, 02:48 AM
Do hidden words such as:
<span style="visibility:hidden">Zephyrhills</span>
show up in a google search?
thanks.
Mark Parnell
Jun 27 2005, 02:58 AM
Previously in alt.www.webmaster, "www.douglassdavis.com"
<[Email Removed]> said:
QUOTE |
Do hidden words such as: <span style="visibility:hidden">Zephyrhills</span
show up in a google search?
|
"Make pages for users, not for search engines. Don't deceive your users
or present different content to search engines than you display to
users, which is commonly referred to as "cloaking.""
http://www.google.com/intl/en/webmasters/guidelines.html--
Mark Parnell
http://www.clarkecomputers.com.au
www.douglassdavis.com
Jun 27 2005, 03:09 AM
interesting...
well... does any one know whether it shows up or not? :) :)
It's not for a deceptive purpose... I promise. :)
Dennis
Jun 27 2005, 03:16 AM
On 26 Jun 2005 www.douglassdavis.com wrote in alt.www.webmaster
QUOTE |
interesting...
well... does any one know whether it shows up or not? :) :)
Yes |
QUOTE |
It's not for a deceptive purpose... I promise. :)
Ya right. |
--
Dennis
Mark Parnell
Jun 27 2005, 03:21 AM
Previously in alt.www.webmaster, "www.douglassdavis.com"
<[Email Removed]> said:
Please quote the relevant parts of the message you are replying to.
[hidden text]
QUOTE |
well... does any one know whether it shows up or not? :) :)
|
Yes it does. But it will likely get your site banned from Google at
least, and probably other search engines as well.
It also shows on UAs with no CSS or CSS disabled.
QUOTE |
It's not for a deceptive purpose... I promise. :)
|
Try telling Google that.
--
Mark Parnell
http://www.clarkecomputers.com.au
http://www.douglassdavis.com
Jun 27 2005, 03:32 AM
Mark: funny you should mention the quote thing... I'm actually using
google's newsgroup interface, and they don't have a quote feature.
I am giving away a PHP script, and I just want to see how many people
are actually using it. I thought I would put some hidden text in
there. Then I could search and see how many people are actually using
it. It's more out of curiosity than anything.
Dennis
Jun 27 2005, 03:39 AM
On 26 Jun 2005 Mark Parnell wrote in alt.www.webmaster
QUOTE |
Yes it does. But it will likely get your site banned from Google at least, and probably other search engines as well.
|
I've used it on 1 of my sites for the past 3 years with no adverse effect. On
mouseover it shows.
--
Dennis
William Tasso
Jun 27 2005, 03:50 AM
Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster
From the safety of the
http://groups.google.com cafeteria
http://www.douglassdavis.com <[Email Removed]> said:
QUOTE |
... mention the quote thing... I'm actually using google's newsgroup interface, and they don't have a quote feature.
|
The software used is a convenience - each poster is responsible for the
content of their postings to usenet.
If your software is letting you down - get a new one.
--
William Tasso
Mark Parnell
Jun 27 2005, 04:16 AM
Previously in alt.www.webmaster, "http://www.douglassdavis.com"
<[Email Removed]> said:
QUOTE |
Mark: funny you should mention the quote thing... I'm actually using google's newsgroup interface, and they don't have a quote feature.
|
http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html has a list of Google sites still
using the old (aka decent) interface.
QUOTE |
I am giving away a PHP script, and I just want to see how many people are actually using it. I thought I would put some hidden text in there. Then I could search and see how many people are actually using it. It's more out of curiosity than anything.
|
Google isn't going to see the source of the PHP script anyway - it will
only see the final output.
--
Mark Parnell
http://www.clarkecomputers.com.au
Big Bill
Jun 27 2005, 05:16 AM
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:21:31 +1000, Mark Parnell
<[Email Removed]> wrote:
QUOTE |
Previously in alt.www.webmaster, "www.douglassdavis.com" <[Email Removed]> said:
Please quote the relevant parts of the message you are replying to.
[hidden text] well... does any one know whether it shows up or not? :) :)
Yes it does. But it will likely get your site banned from Google at least, and probably other search engines as well.
|
Rubbish.
QUOTE |
It also shows on UAs with no CSS or CSS disabled.
It's not for a deceptive purpose... I promise. :)
Try telling Google that.
|
He doesn't have to, they'll know. But if the hidden text is on-topic
for the site and it's a good content-rich site then I see no reason
why he should be banned.
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ [Email Removed]
seo that watches the river flow...
--
David Dorward
Jun 27 2005, 05:28 AM
QUOTE |
Mark: funny you should mention the quote thing... I'm actually using google's newsgroup interface, and they don't have a quote feature.
|
Yes they do. Use the reply link instead of the quick reply textarea.
--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is
Mark Parnell
Jun 27 2005, 05:33 AM
Previously in alt.www.webmaster, Big Bill <[Email Removed]> said:
QUOTE |
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:21:31 +1000, Mark Parnell <[Email Removed]> wrote:
[hidden text] Yes it does. But it will likely get your site banned from Google at least, and probably other search engines as well.
Rubbish.
|
Really? Have you read Google's guidelines I posted before?
From the same page:
"Avoid hidden text or hidden links."
QUOTE |
But if the hidden text is on-topic for the site and it's a good content-rich site then I see no reason why he should be banned.
|
Hidden text is a well-known method of "spamming" the search engines.
They don't look on it very favourably. Who knows - the OP may not get
dropped from the search engines, but it is likely that he will.
--
Mark Parnell
http://www.clarkecomputers.com.au
www.douglassdavis.com
Jun 27 2005, 09:52 AM
David: I guess the new google interface doesn't have quotes, even
when using the reply button.
www.douglassdavis.com
Jun 27 2005, 09:53 AM
QUOTE |
Google isn't going to see the source of the PHP script anyway - it will only see the final output.
|
made my own quotes for y'all there....
Anyway, I hadn't planned to put it in the source of the PHP script :)
Charles Sweeney
Jun 27 2005, 10:23 AM
www.douglassdavis.com wrote
QUOTE |
Google isn't going to see the source of the PHP script anyway - it will only see the final output.
made my own quotes for y'all there....
|
Warrrra guy!
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
Charles Sweeney
Jun 27 2005, 10:28 AM
Charles Sweeney wrote
QUOTE |
www.douglassdavis.com
|
Nice stuff you have there Mr D!
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
David Dorward
Jun 27 2005, 06:12 PM
www.douglassdavis.com wrote:
QUOTE |
David: I guess the new google interface doesn't have quotes, even when using the reply button.
|
I don't need to guess, I know it does:
http://dorward.me.uk/tmp/g-groups.png (and that's just from hitting the
reply button (the proper one in the options, not the quick reply one under
the message)).
--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is
Gerry for email use my name at d
Jun 27 2005, 06:27 PM
Mark Parnell wrote:
QUOTE |
Previously in alt.www.webmaster, Big Bill <[Email Removed]> said:
Hidden text is a well-known method of "spamming" the search engines. They don't look on it very favourably. Who knows - the OP may not get dropped from the search engines, but it is likely that he will.
|
Google isn't this super evil super god... they don't like abuse, but
their are a lot of uses of hidden text, including marking your own
scripts, Dreamweaver uses them to mark out templates, many CMS uses
them, CSS often hides text which may be shown when printed...
Google doesn't like abuse, but its not going to penalize people randomly
.... it is VERY unlikely that google will drop them from the search
engine...
The sites I work on are frequently at number one for what we want, where
we discuss a product it often beats the leading brand behind it.
Google WILL not rank a site if you don't have content, rely on images
etc...
However I would reccomend deleting the research page until you have
something on it, for some reason google does seem to dislike "coming soon"
What you could do is ask to tell you where its being used... provide a
form for it ...
G
www.douglassdavis.com
Jun 27 2005, 06:37 PM
David Dorward wrote:
QUOTE |
www.douglassdavis.com wrote:
David: I guess the new google interface doesn't have quotes, even when using the reply button.
I don't need to guess, I know it does: http://dorward.me.uk/tmp/g-groups.png (and that's just from hitting the reply button (the proper one in the options, not the quick reply one under the message)).
-- David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/ Home is where the ~/.bashrc is
|
well waddaya know! The reply button was "hidden!"
Els
Jun 27 2005, 06:38 PM
Gerry for email use my name at dergal dt com wrote:
QUOTE |
Mark Parnell wrote:
Hidden text is a well-known method of "spamming" the search engines. They don't look on it very favourably. Who knows - the OP may not get dropped from the search engines, but it is likely that he will.
Google isn't this super evil super god... they don't like abuse, but their are a lot of uses of hidden text, including marking your own scripts, Dreamweaver uses them to mark out templates, many CMS uses them,
|
That's not hidden text. Those are comments.
QUOTE |
CSS often hides text which may be shown when printed...
|
Only if web designer writes CSS to do that.
QUOTE |
Google doesn't like abuse, but its not going to penalize people randomly
|
Indeed, it's targeted, not randomly :-)
QUOTE |
... it is VERY unlikely that google will drop them from the search engine...
|
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link. I
realised what happened on the second day, and took the link off. It
took a month before Googlebot started the old daily routine again.
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
www.douglassdavis.com
Jun 27 2005, 06:50 PM
Charles Sweeney wrote:
Thanks. It's just off of a template from www.oswd.org
Very useful site.
Charles Sweeney
Jun 27 2005, 07:30 PM
www.douglassdavis.com wrote
QUOTE |
Charles Sweeney wrote: Charles Sweeney wrote
www.douglassdavis.com
Nice stuff you have there Mr D!
-- Charles Sweeney http://CharlesSweeney.com
Thanks. It's just off of a template from www.oswd.org
|
I was thinking more about your content!
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
Charles Sweeney
Jun 27 2005, 07:31 PM
Els wrote
QUOTE |
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link.
|
Naughty naughty girl!
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
Els
Jun 27 2005, 07:33 PM
Charles Sweeney wrote:
QUOTE |
Els wrote
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link.
Naughty naughty girl!
|
That's me :-)
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Now playing: LuLu - The Man Who Sold The World
William Tasso
Jun 27 2005, 07:36 PM
Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster
From the safety of the LocusMeus.com cafeteria
Els <[Email Removed]> said:
QUOTE |
Charles Sweeney wrote:
Els wrote
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link.
Naughty naughty girl!
That's me :-)
|
URL? pics?
only kiddin' <g>
--
William Tasso
Charles Sweeney
Jun 27 2005, 07:46 PM
William Tasso wrote
QUOTE |
Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster From the safety of the LocusMeus.com cafeteria Els <[Email Removed]> said:
Charles Sweeney wrote:
Els wrote
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link.
Naughty naughty girl!
That's me :-)
URL? pics?
|
## X-NoRead-Els ##
Els can't see this.
I think she's on the sauce again, mate.
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
Els
Jun 27 2005, 09:11 PM
William Tasso wrote:
QUOTE |
Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster From the safety of the LocusMeus.com cafeteria Els <[Email Removed]> said:
Charles Sweeney wrote:
Els wrote
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link.
Naughty naughty girl!
That's me :-)
URL? pics?
only kiddin' <g
|
I'm offended.
(cause you feel the need to explain you're kidding ;-) )
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Now playing: Don McLean - American Pie
William Tasso
Jun 27 2005, 09:14 PM
Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster
From the safety of the LocusMeus.com cafeteria
Els <[Email Removed]> said:
QUOTE |
William Tasso wrote:
Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster From the safety of the LocusMeus.com cafeteria Els <[Email Removed]> said:
Charles Sweeney wrote:
Els wrote
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link.
Naughty naughty girl!
That's me :-)
URL? pics?
only kiddin' <g
I'm offended.
|
Now, I'm shocked :)
QUOTE |
(cause you feel the need to explain you're kidding ;-) )
|
That bit wasn't for /you/ ;)
--
William Tasso
Els
Jun 27 2005, 09:25 PM
William Tasso wrote:
QUOTE |
Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster From the safety of the LocusMeus.com cafeteria Els <[Email Removed]> said:
William Tasso wrote:
Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster From the safety of the LocusMeus.com cafeteria Els <[Email Removed]> said:
Charles Sweeney wrote:
Els wrote
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link.
Naughty naughty girl!
That's me :-)
URL? pics?
only kiddin' <g
I'm offended.
Now, I'm shocked :)
|
Speechless...
.... can't believe that - Mr. Tasso of AWW - shocked!?
QUOTE |
(cause you feel the need to explain you're kidding ;-) )
That bit wasn't for /you/ ;)
|
Ah!
That's okay then - Charles can be offended instead ;P
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Now playing: Ellen Foley - We Belong To The Night
William Tasso
Jun 27 2005, 09:31 PM
Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster
From the safety of the LocusMeus.com cafeteria
Els <[Email Removed]> said:
QUOTE |
William Tasso wrote:
Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster From the safety of the LocusMeus.com cafeteria Els <[Email Removed]> said:
... (cause you feel the need to explain you're kidding ;-) )
That bit wasn't for /you/ ;)
Ah! That's okay then - Charles can be offended instead ;P
|
That'll be the day <g>
--
William Tasso
Charles Sweeney
Jun 27 2005, 10:34 PM
William Tasso wrote
QUOTE |
Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster From the safety of the LocusMeus.com cafeteria Els <[Email Removed]> said: That's okay then - Charles can be offended instead ;P
That'll be the day <g
|
Big Bill
Jun 28 2005, 04:26 AM
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:33:35 +1000, Mark Parnell
<[Email Removed]> wrote:
QUOTE |
Previously in alt.www.webmaster, Big Bill <[Email Removed]> said: On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:21:31 +1000, Mark Parnell <[Email Removed]> wrote:
[hidden text] Yes it does. But it will likely get your site banned from Google at least, and probably other search engines as well.
Rubbish.
Really? Have you read Google's guidelines I posted before?
From the same page: "Avoid hidden text or hidden links."
|
Guideline. Not an absolute.
QUOTE |
But if the hidden text is on-topic for the site and it's a good content-rich site then I see no reason why he should be banned.
Hidden text is a well-known method of "spamming" the search engines. They don't look on it very favourably. Who knows - the OP may not get dropped from the search engines, but it is likely that he will.
|
Actually it's likely that he won't. It really depends upon what else
is available in the index for that category. If all the other sites
are similarly spammed then no engine can drop them otherwise they'll
have no category. So, people looking for results in that category will
have to go to another engine to find results. Not a good thing for an
engine. So, while they'd really all prefer that people didn't make
sites with dumb stuff like hidden text, the engines will take what
they can get. And they do. Because they have to.
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ [Email Removed]
seo that watches the river flow...
--
Big Bill
Jun 28 2005, 04:26 AM
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:38:29 +0200, Els <[Email Removed]>
wrote:
QUOTE |
Gerry for email use my name at dergal dt com wrote: Mark Parnell wrote:
Hidden text is a well-known method of "spamming" the search engines. They don't look on it very favourably. Who knows - the OP may not get dropped from the search engines, but it is likely that he will.
Google isn't this super evil super god... they don't like abuse, but their are a lot of uses of hidden text, including marking your own scripts, Dreamweaver uses them to mark out templates, many CMS uses them,
That's not hidden text. Those are comments.
CSS often hides text which may be shown when printed...
Only if web designer writes CSS to do that.
Google doesn't like abuse, but its not going to penalize people randomly
Indeed, it's targeted, not randomly :-)
... it is VERY unlikely that google will drop them from the search engine...
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link. I realised what happened on the second day, and took the link off. It took a month before Googlebot started the old daily routine again.
|
You assumed that was what happened, Els, doesn't mean you were correct
in that.
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ [Email Removed]
seo that watches the river flow...
--
Big Bill
Jun 28 2005, 04:26 AM
On 27 Jun 2005 20:31:57 GMT, Charles Sweeney <[Email Removed]>
wrote:
QUOTE |
Els wrote
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link.
Naughty naughty girl!
|
Els is a girl?
BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk/ [Email Removed]
seo that watches the river flow...
--
Els
Jun 28 2005, 06:09 AM
Big Bill wrote:
QUOTE |
On 27 Jun 2005 20:31:57 GMT, Charles Sweeney <[Email Removed] wrote:
Els wrote
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link.
Naughty naughty girl!
Els is a girl?
|
You sound surprised?
For the record: I've always been a girl. Even when I didn't wanna be,
cause playing football and climbing trees is so much more fun than
Barbies <g>
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Els
Jun 28 2005, 06:10 AM
Big Bill wrote:
QUOTE |
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:38:29 +0200, Els <[Email Removed] wrote:
Gerry for email use my name at dergal dt com wrote: Mark Parnell wrote:
Hidden text is a well-known method of "spamming" the search engines. They don't look on it very favourably. Who knows - the OP may not get dropped from the search engines, but it is likely that he will.
Google isn't this super evil super god... they don't like abuse, but their are a lot of uses of hidden text, including marking your own scripts, Dreamweaver uses them to mark out templates, many CMS uses them,
That's not hidden text. Those are comments.
CSS often hides text which may be shown when printed...
Only if web designer writes CSS to do that.
Google doesn't like abuse, but its not going to penalize people randomly
Indeed, it's targeted, not randomly :-)
... it is VERY unlikely that google will drop them from the search engine...
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link. I realised what happened on the second day, and took the link off. It took a month before Googlebot started the old daily routine again.
You assumed that was what happened, Els, doesn't mean you were correct in that.
|
Correct. If it wasn't the cause, it was awfully coincidental though.
That site had the Googlebot visiting literally every day for months,
and 1 day after I placed that link, it disappeared for a month, and it
never stopped after it started again.
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Dylan Parry
Jun 28 2005, 07:14 AM
Using a pointed stick and pebbles, Els scraped:
QUOTE |
playing football and climbing trees is so much more fun than Barbies <g
|
I dunno... pulling the heads off Barbies[1] was *always* fun ;)
____
[1] Note to self: Do not let spell checker correct this to "babies".
--
Dylan Parry
http://webpageworkshop.co.uk -- FREE Web tutorials and references
Els
Jun 28 2005, 07:18 AM
Dylan Parry wrote:
QUOTE |
Using a pointed stick and pebbles, Els scraped:
playing football and climbing trees is so much more fun than Barbies <g
I dunno... pulling the heads off Barbies[1] was *always* fun ;)
|
You mean your sister didn't hit you hard enough for it? :-)
QUOTE |
____ [1] Note to self: Do not let spell checker correct this to "babies".
|
<g>
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Dylan Parry
Jun 28 2005, 07:36 AM
Using a pointed stick and pebbles, Els scraped:
QUOTE |
I dunno... pulling the heads off Barbies[1] was *always* fun ;)
You mean your sister didn't hit you hard enough for it? :-)
|
I don't have a sister. I went round with my vicious gang of evil
toddlers, and rounded up all the local barbies ;)
--
Dylan Parry
http://webpageworkshop.co.uk -- FREE Web tutorials and references
Els
Jun 28 2005, 07:38 AM
Dylan Parry wrote:
QUOTE |
Using a pointed stick and pebbles, Els scraped:
I dunno... pulling the heads off Barbies[1] was *always* fun ;)
You mean your sister didn't hit you hard enough for it? :-)
I don't have a sister. I went round with my vicious gang of evil toddlers, and rounded up all the local barbies ;)
|
I can just picture that <g>
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Charles Sweeney
Jun 28 2005, 08:07 AM
Big Bill wrote
QUOTE |
On 27 Jun 2005 20:31:57 GMT, Charles Sweeney <[Email Removed] wrote:
Els wrote
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link.
Naughty naughty girl!
Els is a girl?
|
You bet she is! Perhaps "sophisticated woman" would be a better
description!
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
Els
Jun 28 2005, 08:08 AM
Charles Sweeney wrote:
QUOTE |
Big Bill wrote
On 27 Jun 2005 20:31:57 GMT, Charles Sweeney <[Email Removed] wrote:
Els wrote
I did lose a daily Google visit once because of a hidden link.
Naughty naughty girl!
Els is a girl?
You bet she is!
|
:-)
QUOTE |
Perhaps "sophisticated woman" would be a better description!
|
Which only goes to show you never met me - LOL!
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Charles Sweeney
Jun 28 2005, 08:09 AM
Big Bill wrote
QUOTE |
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:33:35 +1000, Mark Parnell <[Email Removed]> wrote: "Avoid hidden text or hidden links."
Guideline. Not an absolute.
|
Better to stay within their guidelines, I would say.
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
Charles Sweeney
Jun 28 2005, 08:12 AM
Els wrote
QUOTE |
Charles Sweeney wrote: Perhaps "sophisticated woman" would be a better description!
Which only goes to show you never met me - LOL!
|
:o)
I think I prefer "naughty naughty girl"!
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
Charles Sweeney
Jun 28 2005, 12:09 PM
GreyWyvern wrote
QUOTE |
And lo, Dylan Parry didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:
[1] Note to self: Do not let spell checker correct [Barbies] to "babies".
GAH! Since you mentioned that, I couldn't read any of this post or the following ones without making the substitution :|
|
That happened to me too. The power of suggestion!
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
GreyWyvern
Jun 28 2005, 12:09 PM
And lo, Dylan Parry didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:
QUOTE |
[1] Note to self: Do not let spell checker correct [Barbies] to "babies".
|
GAH! Since you mentioned that, I couldn't read any of this post or the
following ones without making the substitution :|
Grey
Mark Parnell
Jun 28 2005, 10:20 PM
Previously in alt.www.webmaster, Big Bill <[Email Removed]> said:
QUOTE |
Actually it's likely that he won't.
|
Personally I'm not willing to take that risk. The guidelines are there
for a reason.
--
Mark Parnell
http://www.clarkecomputers.com.au
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.