paul
Jun 30 2005, 08:34 AM
Hi,
How would I addd the pseudo class Hover to the following css snippet;
a.linkone {
background-image: url(web-content/images/images/menuup-1_01.gif);
}
The link is being used in a unordered type list which is defined by the
following:
ul#mainnav {
list-style:none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background-color: #39A3FF;
}
ul#mainnav li a:link, ul#mainnav li a:visited {
text-decoration: none;
display: block;
width: 100%;
color: #005299;
width: 88%;
padding: 6px 6%;
font: bold 10pt/1.5 arial,sans-serif;
}
ul#mainnav li {
border-top: 1px solid #a5b5c6;
}
ul#mainnav li a:hover {
background-color: #BFE1FF;
color: #7B7CFF;
}
And the code for the list is;
<ul id="mainnav">
<li ><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linkone">link one</a></li>
<li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linktwo">link two</a></li>
<li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linkthree">link three</a></li>
<li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linkfour">link four</a></li>
<li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linkfive">link five</a></li>
<li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linksix">link six</a></li>
<li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linkseven">link seven</a></li>
</ul>
I dont want to use the same image on each link, thats why I have defined
seven different classes for the <a href> tag .linkone to .linkseven
Hope you can help, and I hope I'm posting in the right place, if not
sorry!
TIA
Paul
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 3286 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
paul
Jun 30 2005, 08:41 AM
sorry for the double posting OE had a fit
Paul
"paul" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:da0edp$mjq$[Email Removed]...
QUOTE |
Hi, How would I addd the pseudo class Hover to the following css snippet;
a.linkone { background-image: url(web-content/images/images/menuup-1_01.gif); }
The link is being used in a unordered type list which is defined by the following:
ul#mainnav { list-style:none; margin: 0; padding: 0; background-color: #39A3FF;
} ul#mainnav li a:link, ul#mainnav li a:visited { text-decoration: none; display: block; width: 100%; color: #005299; width: 88%; padding: 6px 6%; font: bold 10pt/1.5 arial,sans-serif;
} ul#mainnav li { border-top: 1px solid #a5b5c6; } ul#mainnav li a:hover { background-color: #BFE1FF; color: #7B7CFF;
}
And the code for the list is;
<ul id="mainnav" <li ><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linkone">link one</a></li <li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linktwo">link two</a></li <li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linkthree">link three</a></li <li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linkfour">link four</a></li <li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linkfive">link five</a></li <li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linksix">link six</a></li <li><a href="(EmptyReference!)" class="linkseven">link seven</a></li </ul
I dont want to use the same image on each link, thats why I have defined seven different classes for the <a href> tag .linkone to .linkseven
Hope you can help, and I hope I'm posting in the right place, if not sorry!
TIA
Paul
-- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 3286 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
|
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 3287 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
Charles Sweeney
Jun 30 2005, 11:31 AM
paul wrote
QUOTE |
-- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 3287 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
|
Not addressed to you Paul.
Fucking great isn't it? The bottom line, including the exclemation
mark, would make any spammer proud.
This bit is addressed to you Paul.
Please tell SPAMfighter that I don't like seeing their free ads all over
usenet. And it's poor messengers like you who are doing their dirty
spamming work for them.
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
Paul Watt
Jul 3 2005, 02:24 PM
On 30 Jun 2005 12:31:27 GMT, Charles Sweeney <[Email Removed]>
wrote:
QUOTE |
paul wrote
-- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 3287 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
Not addressed to you Paul.
Fucking great isn't it? The bottom line, including the exclemation mark, would make any spammer proud.
This bit is addressed to you Paul.
Please tell SPAMfighter that I don't like seeing their free ads all over usenet. And it's poor messengers like you who are doing their dirty spamming work for them.
|
Charles,
Just to let you know, i've ditched OE as my newsreader and am now
using free agent...no SPAMfighter messages any more!
Paul
Stacey
Jul 3 2005, 02:36 PM
"Paul Watt" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
QUOTE |
On 30 Jun 2005 12:31:27 GMT, Charles Sweeney <[Email Removed] wrote:
paul wrote
-- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 3287 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
Not addressed to you Paul.
Fucking great isn't it? The bottom line, including the exclemation mark, would make any spammer proud.
This bit is addressed to you Paul.
Please tell SPAMfighter that I don't like seeing their free ads all over usenet. And it's poor messengers like you who are doing their dirty spamming work for them.
Charles,
Just to let you know, i've ditched OE as my newsreader and am now using free agent...no SPAMfighter messages any more!
|
I use OE and I don't have a sig with messages for SPAMfighter!
Charles Sweeney
Jul 3 2005, 08:28 PM
Paul Watt wrote
QUOTE |
On 30 Jun 2005 12:31:27 GMT, Charles Sweeney <[Email Removed] wrote:
paul wrote
-- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 3287 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
Not addressed to you Paul.
Fucking great isn't it? The bottom line, including the exclemation mark, would make any spammer proud.
This bit is addressed to you Paul.
Please tell SPAMfighter that I don't like seeing their free ads all over usenet. And it's poor messengers like you who are doing their dirty spamming work for them.
Charles,
Just to let you know, i've ditched OE as my newsreader and am now using free agent...no SPAMfighter messages any more!
|
Yiipppeeee!!
I used to use OE. I now use Xnews. I would highly recommend it.
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
Charles Sweeney
Jul 3 2005, 08:29 PM
Stacey wrote
QUOTE |
"Paul Watt" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed]... On 30 Jun 2005 12:31:27 GMT, Charles Sweeney <[Email Removed] wrote:
paul wrote
-- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 3287 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
Not addressed to you Paul.
Fucking great isn't it? The bottom line, including the exclemation mark, would make any spammer proud.
This bit is addressed to you Paul.
Please tell SPAMfighter that I don't like seeing their free ads all over usenet. And it's poor messengers like you who are doing their dirty spamming work for them.
Charles,
Just to let you know, i've ditched OE as my newsreader and am now using free agent...no SPAMfighter messages any more!
I use OE and I don't have a sig with messages for SPAMfighter!
|
Woops. My response to Paul doesn't quite make sense now. I mis-read
it.
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
Stacey
Jul 4 2005, 04:04 AM
"Charles Sweeney" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:
[email protected]...
QUOTE |
Stacey wrote
"Paul Watt" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed]... On 30 Jun 2005 12:31:27 GMT, Charles Sweeney <[Email Removed] wrote:
paul wrote
-- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 3287 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
Not addressed to you Paul.
Fucking great isn't it? The bottom line, including the exclemation mark, would make any spammer proud.
This bit is addressed to you Paul.
Please tell SPAMfighter that I don't like seeing their free ads all over usenet. And it's poor messengers like you who are doing their dirty spamming work for them.
Charles,
Just to let you know, i've ditched OE as my newsreader and am now using free agent...no SPAMfighter messages any more!
I use OE and I don't have a sig with messages for SPAMfighter!
Woops. My response to Paul doesn't quite make sense now. I mis-read it.
|
LOL! That is OK.
Stacey
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.