Help - Search - Member List - Calendar
Full Version: ftp
WorkTheWeb Forums > Webmaster Resources > Webmaster - General Help
Support our Sponsors!
DBLEXPOSURE
I have been using an ftp client call netload. Is no longer supported.

Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and
up load only the new files.

My directories are huge. WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.

All suggestions are appreciated

PZ

www.weisd.com

http://e-parts.netfirms.com

http://imagequest.netfirms.com

Disco Octopus
DBLEXPOSURE wrote :
QUOTE
I have been using an ftp client call netload.  Is no longer supported.

Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and
up load only the new files.

My directories are huge.  WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.

All suggestions are appreciated


I havent tried these but a quick google showed me....
http://www.turboftp.com/
http://www.ftpshell.com/
http://www.deskshare.com/afm.aspx
http://www.robo-ftp.com/
....and a whole lot more...

--
a beef jerky web site : http://www.choicebeefjerky.com.au
not a beef jerky web site : http://mycoolfish.com/vote.cmks
eating alone is medicinal

DBLEXPOSURE
"Disco Octopus" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
QUOTE
DBLEXPOSURE wrote :
I have been using an ftp client call netload.  Is no longer supported.

Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files
and up load only the new files.

My directories are huge.  WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.

All suggestions are appreciated


I havent tried these but a quick google showed me....
http://www.turboftp.com/
http://www.ftpshell.com/
http://www.deskshare.com/afm.aspx
http://www.robo-ftp.com/
...and a whole lot more...

--
a beef jerky web site : http://www.choicebeefjerky.com.au
not a beef jerky web site : http://mycoolfish.com/vote.cmks
eating alone is medicinal


Thanks, I know there are an abundace of them. I am hoping usegroups can
help narrow the selection some..

Baho Utot
begin virus.scr.txt On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:25:42 -0500, DBLEXPOSURE
wrote:

QUOTE
I have been using an ftp client call netload.  Is no longer supported.

Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and
up load only the new files.

My directories are huge.  WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.

All suggestions are appreciated

PZ

www.weisd.com

http://e-parts.netfirms.com

http://imagequest.netfirms.com

rsync

--
Tayo'y Mga Pinoy

Alan Apperson
If your using DW , just synch the files and this will be done automatically
"DBLEXPOSURE" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
QUOTE
I have been using an ftp client call netload.  Is no longer supported.

Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files
and
up load only the new files.

My directories are huge.  WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.

All suggestions are appreciated

PZ

www.weisd.com

http://e-parts.netfirms.com

http://imagequest.netfirms.com





Gerry for email use my name at d
QUOTE
"DBLEXPOSURE" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...

I have been using an ftp client call netload.  Is no longer supported.

Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files

and

up load only the new files.

My directories are huge.  WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.

All suggestions are appreciated

PZ

www.weisd.com

http://e-parts.netfirms.com

http://imagequest.netfirms.com




Alan Apperson wrote:
QUOTE
If your using DW , just synch the files and this will be done automatically

Alan - some newsgroups top post, some newsgroups bottom post - there is

no "right" way, however you do have to follow the group convention,
otherwise it becomes a mess, this one bottom posts, i.e. the replles are
at the bottom ...

My preffered FTP client is Leech because it doesn't seem to choke... but
yes DW is very very good, if a little funny at times.... (only started
using it very recently for FTP, it used to be rubbish - but at work we
have been using it!)

G

Brian Cryer
"DBLEXPOSURE" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
QUOTE
I have been using an ftp client call netload.  Is no longer supported.

Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files
and up load only the new files.

My directories are huge.  WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.

All suggestions are appreciated

PZ

www.weisd.com

http://e-parts.netfirms.com

http://imagequest.netfirms.com


I use Web Site Publisher (www.cryer.co.uk/downloads/websitepublisher/), its
free, does the job but only runs under Windows.

Brian.

Els
DBLEXPOSURE wrote:

QUOTE
I have been using an ftp client call netload.  Is no longer supported.

Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and
up load only the new files.

My directories are huge.  WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.

All suggestions are appreciated

I use AceFTP, free version.
It compares local and remote, with option to compare for just existent
vs non-existent, or difference in date or filesize. I never check for
filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few
bytes off compared to local files, and checking for date differences
only has effect if the time on the server is the same as on your local
pc.

The largest directory I've worked with so far has about 1300 image
files, but it never choked.

The only disadvantage I've found in AceFTP, is that it can't handle
usernames with an @ in it. (maybe the Pro version can though, I don't
know that)

--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -

Chris Hope
Els wrote:

QUOTE
DBLEXPOSURE wrote:

I have been using an ftp client call netload.  Is no longer
supported.

Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote
files and up load only the new files.

My directories are huge.  WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.

All suggestions are appreciated

I use AceFTP, free version.
It compares local and remote, with option to compare for just existent
vs non-existent, or difference in date or filesize. I never check for
filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few
bytes off compared to local files,

Probably because you are using Windows and the server is using a
Unix-like OS (or vice versa). The line endings in plain text files are
different between the two so when you upload from Windows to Unix the
file size reduces by 1 byte for every line break (or increases by 1 for
the reverse).

QUOTE
and checking for date differences
only has effect if the time on the server is the same as on your local
pc.

The largest directory I've worked with so far has about 1300 image
files, but it never choked.

The only disadvantage I've found in AceFTP, is that it can't handle
usernames with an @ in it. (maybe the Pro version can though, I don't
know that)

--
Chris Hope | www.electrictoolbox.com | www.linuxcdmall.com

Blinky the Shark
Els wrote:

QUOTE
vs non-existent, or difference in date or filesize. I never check for
filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few
bytes off compared to local files, and checking for date differences

Different file systems?

--
Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
Killing all Usenet posts from Google Groups
Info: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
*ALSO contains links for access to the NON-BETA GG archive interface*

Els
Blinky the Shark wrote:

QUOTE
Els wrote:

vs non-existent, or difference in date or filesize. I never check for
filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few
bytes off compared to local files, and checking for date differences

Different file systems?

As in my pc runs WinXP and the server is a Linux box? Yep :-)
(never knew that would effect the filesize...)

--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -

Els
Chris Hope wrote:

[FTP compare local/remote]
QUOTE
I never check for
filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few
bytes off compared to local files,

Probably because you are using Windows and the server is using a
Unix-like OS (or vice versa). The line endings in plain text files are
different between the two so when you upload from Windows to Unix the
file size reduces by 1 byte for every line break (or increases by 1 for
the reverse).

Thanks Chris, something new to be learned every day :-)

--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -

Norman L. DeForest
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Els wrote:

QUOTE
Chris Hope wrote:

[FTP compare local/remote]
I never check for
filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few
bytes off compared to local files,

Probably because you are using Windows and the server is using a
Unix-like OS (or vice versa). The line endings in plain text files are
different between the two so when you upload from Windows to Unix the
file size reduces by 1 byte for every line break (or increases by 1 for
the reverse).

Thanks Chris, something new to be learned every day :-)

That's why ftp has both a binary and a text mode. Text mode allows
character conversion and binary doesn't. If my memory of what I have
read isn't faulty, ages ago (in Internet terms), conversion between
ASCII and EBCDIC was a common event. These days, most character
conversion is only for end-of-line markers:

Unix: 1 byte, LF (0Ah)
Mac: 1 byte, CR (0Dh)
DOS/Windows: 2 bytes, CR,LF (0Dh,0Ah)

I have exchanged messages with a Mac user in the past[1] and found my
ISO-8859-1 accented characters (and other high characters) converted
to the Mac character set in his quoted replies (I would type "caf"
and the quoted reply would have "caf" or I would type "15" for
for "fifteen degrees" and my quoted text in his replies would
have "15", for two examples).

[1] about five to seven years ago.
--
">> consider moving away from Front Page...."
">To what? Any suggestions?"
"Naked bungee-jumping. It's less humiliating <g>"
-- Matt Probert in alt.www.webmaster, March 20, 2005

Els
Norman L. DeForest wrote:

QUOTE
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Els wrote:

Chris Hope wrote:

[FTP compare local/remote]
I never check for
filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few
bytes off compared to local files,

Probably because you are using Windows and the server is using a
Unix-like OS (or vice versa). The line endings in plain text files are
different between the two so when you upload from Windows to Unix the
file size reduces by 1 byte for every line break (or increases by 1 for
the reverse).

Thanks Chris, something new to be learned every day :-)

That's why ftp has both a binary and a text mode.  Text mode allows
character conversion and binary doesn't.  If my memory of what I have
read isn't faulty, ages ago (in Internet terms), conversion between
ASCII and EBCDIC was a common event.  These days, most character
conversion is only for end-of-line markers:

Unix:        1 byte,  LF    (0Ah)
Mac:        1 byte,  CR    (0Dh)
DOS/Windows: 2 bytes,  CR,LF  (0Dh,0Ah)

I have exchanged messages with a Mac user in the past[1] and found my
ISO-8859-1 accented characters (and other high characters) converted
to the Mac character set in his quoted replies (I would type "caf"
and the quoted reply would have "caf" or I would type "15" for
for "fifteen degrees" and my quoted text in his replies would
have "15", for two examples).

[1] about five to seven years ago.

Just checked which mode is being used, and it appears I get to choose
between ASCII, binary, EBCDIC, local and auto, and it's set to auto.
On transfer of a text file, it chooses ASCII.
I never had any characters changed in the transfer though (except for
those line-breaks apparently).

--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -

Norman L. DeForest
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Els wrote:

QUOTE
Norman L. DeForest wrote:
[snip]
I have exchanged messages with a Mac user in the past[1] and found my
ISO-8859-1 accented characters (and other high characters) converted
to the Mac character set in his quoted replies (I would type "caf"
and the quoted reply would have "caf" or I would type "15" for
^^^^

Your post also changed one of my characters from CP1252 to
ISO-8859-15. You quote "caf" ("caf" + hex B4) where I had posted
"caf" ("caf" + hex 8E). It's Z with caron in both respective
character sets but, since Pine doesn't attempt to convert character
sets, the quoted character shows up for me as an accute accent.

QUOTE
for "fifteen degrees" and my quoted text in his replies would
have "15", for two examples).

[1] about five to seven years ago.

Just checked which mode is being used, and it appears I get to choose
between ASCII, binary, EBCDIC, local and auto, and it's set to auto.
On transfer of a text file, it chooses ASCII.
I never had any characters changed in the transfer though (except for
those line-breaks apparently).

--
Norman De Forest http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~af380/Profile.html
[Email Removed] [=||=] (A Speech Friendly Site)
"We put up with each other's vices. She smokes, I eviscerate. I'm trying
to quit." -- the Inspector General in _Under_the_Healing_Sign_

Els
Norman L. DeForest wrote:

QUOTE
and the quoted reply would have "caf" or I would type "15" for
^^^^
Your post also changed one of my characters from CP1252 to
ISO-8859-15.  You quote "caf" ("caf" + hex B4) where I had posted
"caf" ("caf" + hex 8E).  It's Z with caron in both respective
character sets but, since Pine doesn't attempt to convert character
sets, the quoted character shows up for me as an accute accent.

That must be on your end afaics, because in my post, quoting your
text, I read "caf". It's in your reply only that I see the change in
the bit I quoted.

--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -

Stefan Walker
DBLEXPOSURE wrote:
QUOTE
I have been using an ftp client call netload.  Is no longer supported.

Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and
up load only the new files.

My directories are huge.  WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.

All suggestions are appreciated

PZ

www.weisd.com

http://e-parts.netfirms.com

http://imagequest.netfirms.com




Site Publisher?
Todd H.
"Alan Apperson" <[Email Removed]> writes:

QUOTE
If your using DW , just synch the files and this will be done
automatically

DW as in Dreamweaver? It's got the shittiest most unreliable, built
in FTP client in the industry. The thing drives me friggin nuts.

If his needs are choking WS-FTP Pro, DW's ftp client doesn't stand a
chance.

--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/

Todd H.
Els <[Email Removed]> writes:

QUOTE
Blinky the Shark wrote:

Els wrote:

vs non-existent, or difference in date or filesize. I never check for
filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few
bytes off compared to local files, and checking for date differences

Different file systems?

As in my pc runs WinXP and the server is a Linux box? Yep :-)
(never knew that would effect the filesize...)

Yeah, you may notice that the differences occur only in text files
(.html) and not binary files (.jpg). The reason is that the windows
world ends line with a carriage return and line feed whiel the unix
file format doesn't feel the need to terminate lines with that extra
^M.

Best Regards,
--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/

Edwin van der Vaart
DBLEXPOSURE wrote:
QUOTE
I have been using an ftp client call netload.  Is no longer supported.

Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and
up load only the new files.

My directories are huge.  WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.

All suggestions are appreciated
Smartftp?

http://www.smartftp.com/
--
Edwin van der Vaart
http://www.semi-conductor.nl/ Links to Semiconductors sites
http://www.evandervaart.nl/ Under construction


PHP Help | Linux Help | Web Hosting | Reseller Hosting | SSL Hosting
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2006 Invision Power Services, Inc.