DBLEXPOSURE
Jul 11 2005, 11:25 PM
I have been using an ftp client call netload. Is no longer supported.
Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and
up load only the new files.
My directories are huge. WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.
All suggestions are appreciated
PZ
www.weisd.com
http://e-parts.netfirms.comhttp://imagequest.netfirms.com
Disco Octopus
Jul 11 2005, 11:37 PM
DBLEXPOSURE wrote :
QUOTE |
I have been using an ftp client call netload. Is no longer supported.
Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and up load only the new files.
My directories are huge. WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.
All suggestions are appreciated
|
DBLEXPOSURE
Jul 11 2005, 11:43 PM
"Disco Octopus" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
Thanks, I know there are an abundace of them. I am hoping usegroups can
help narrow the selection some..
Baho Utot
Jul 12 2005, 12:00 AM
begin virus.scr.txt On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:25:42 -0500, DBLEXPOSURE
wrote:
QUOTE |
I have been using an ftp client call netload. Is no longer supported.
Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and up load only the new files.
My directories are huge. WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.
All suggestions are appreciated
PZ
www.weisd.com
http://e-parts.netfirms.com
http://imagequest.netfirms.com
|
rsync
--
Tayo'y Mga Pinoy
Alan Apperson
Jul 12 2005, 05:13 AM
If your using DW , just synch the files and this will be done automatically
"DBLEXPOSURE" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
QUOTE |
I have been using an ftp client call netload. Is no longer supported.
Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and up load only the new files.
My directories are huge. WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.
All suggestions are appreciated
PZ
www.weisd.com
http://e-parts.netfirms.com
http://imagequest.netfirms.com
|
Gerry for email use my name at d
Jul 12 2005, 06:16 AM
QUOTE |
"DBLEXPOSURE" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed]...
I have been using an ftp client call netload. Is no longer supported.
Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files
and
up load only the new files.
My directories are huge. WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.
All suggestions are appreciated
PZ
www.weisd.com
http://e-parts.netfirms.com
http://imagequest.netfirms.com
|
Alan Apperson wrote:
QUOTE |
If your using DW , just synch the files and this will be done automatically
Alan - some newsgroups top post, some newsgroups bottom post - there is |
no "right" way, however you do have to follow the group convention,
otherwise it becomes a mess, this one bottom posts, i.e. the replles are
at the bottom ...
My preffered FTP client is Leech because it doesn't seem to choke... but
yes DW is very very good, if a little funny at times.... (only started
using it very recently for FTP, it used to be rubbish - but at work we
have been using it!)
G
Brian Cryer
Jul 12 2005, 07:02 AM
"DBLEXPOSURE" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
QUOTE |
I have been using an ftp client call netload. Is no longer supported.
Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and up load only the new files.
My directories are huge. WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.
All suggestions are appreciated
PZ
www.weisd.com
http://e-parts.netfirms.com
http://imagequest.netfirms.com
|
I use Web Site Publisher (www.cryer.co.uk/downloads/websitepublisher/), its
free, does the job but only runs under Windows.
Brian.
Els
Jul 12 2005, 07:16 AM
DBLEXPOSURE wrote:
QUOTE |
I have been using an ftp client call netload. Is no longer supported.
Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and up load only the new files.
My directories are huge. WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.
All suggestions are appreciated
|
I use AceFTP, free version.
It compares local and remote, with option to compare for just existent
vs non-existent, or difference in date or filesize. I never check for
filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few
bytes off compared to local files, and checking for date differences
only has effect if the time on the server is the same as on your local
pc.
The largest directory I've worked with so far has about 1300 image
files, but it never choked.
The only disadvantage I've found in AceFTP, is that it can't handle
usernames with an @ in it. (maybe the Pro version can though, I don't
know that)
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Chris Hope
Jul 12 2005, 07:25 AM
Els wrote:
QUOTE |
DBLEXPOSURE wrote:
I have been using an ftp client call netload. Is no longer supported.
Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and up load only the new files.
My directories are huge. WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.
All suggestions are appreciated
I use AceFTP, free version. It compares local and remote, with option to compare for just existent vs non-existent, or difference in date or filesize. I never check for filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few bytes off compared to local files,
|
Probably because you are using Windows and the server is using a
Unix-like OS (or vice versa). The line endings in plain text files are
different between the two so when you upload from Windows to Unix the
file size reduces by 1 byte for every line break (or increases by 1 for
the reverse).
QUOTE |
and checking for date differences only has effect if the time on the server is the same as on your local pc.
The largest directory I've worked with so far has about 1300 image files, but it never choked.
The only disadvantage I've found in AceFTP, is that it can't handle usernames with an @ in it. (maybe the Pro version can though, I don't know that)
|
--
Chris Hope | www.electrictoolbox.com | www.linuxcdmall.com
Blinky the Shark
Jul 12 2005, 07:25 AM
Els wrote:
QUOTE |
vs non-existent, or difference in date or filesize. I never check for filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few bytes off compared to local files, and checking for date differences
|
Different file systems?
--
Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
Killing all Usenet posts from Google Groups
Info:
http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html*ALSO contains links for access to the NON-BETA GG archive interface*
Els
Jul 12 2005, 07:39 AM
Blinky the Shark wrote:
QUOTE |
Els wrote:
vs non-existent, or difference in date or filesize. I never check for filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few bytes off compared to local files, and checking for date differences
Different file systems?
|
As in my pc runs WinXP and the server is a Linux box? Yep :-)
(never knew that would effect the filesize...)
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Els
Jul 12 2005, 07:46 AM
Chris Hope wrote:
[FTP compare local/remote]
QUOTE |
I never check for filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few bytes off compared to local files,
Probably because you are using Windows and the server is using a Unix-like OS (or vice versa). The line endings in plain text files are different between the two so when you upload from Windows to Unix the file size reduces by 1 byte for every line break (or increases by 1 for the reverse).
|
Thanks Chris, something new to be learned every day :-)
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Norman L. DeForest
Jul 12 2005, 08:19 AM
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Els wrote:
QUOTE |
Chris Hope wrote:
[FTP compare local/remote] I never check for filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few bytes off compared to local files,
Probably because you are using Windows and the server is using a Unix-like OS (or vice versa). The line endings in plain text files are different between the two so when you upload from Windows to Unix the file size reduces by 1 byte for every line break (or increases by 1 for the reverse).
Thanks Chris, something new to be learned every day :-)
|
That's why ftp has both a binary and a text mode. Text mode allows
character conversion and binary doesn't. If my memory of what I have
read isn't faulty, ages ago (in Internet terms), conversion between
ASCII and EBCDIC was a common event. These days, most character
conversion is only for end-of-line markers:
Unix: 1 byte, LF (0Ah)
Mac: 1 byte, CR (0Dh)
DOS/Windows: 2 bytes, CR,LF (0Dh,0Ah)
I have exchanged messages with a Mac user in the past[1] and found my
ISO-8859-1 accented characters (and other high characters) converted
to the Mac character set in his quoted replies (I would type "caf"
and the quoted reply would have "caf" or I would type "15" for
for "fifteen degrees" and my quoted text in his replies would
have "15", for two examples).
[1] about five to seven years ago.
--
">> consider moving away from Front Page...."
">To what? Any suggestions?"
"Naked bungee-jumping. It's less humiliating <g>"
-- Matt Probert in alt.www.webmaster, March 20, 2005
Els
Jul 12 2005, 09:02 AM
Norman L. DeForest wrote:
QUOTE |
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Els wrote:
Chris Hope wrote:
[FTP compare local/remote] I never check for filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few bytes off compared to local files,
Probably because you are using Windows and the server is using a Unix-like OS (or vice versa). The line endings in plain text files are different between the two so when you upload from Windows to Unix the file size reduces by 1 byte for every line break (or increases by 1 for the reverse).
Thanks Chris, something new to be learned every day :-)
That's why ftp has both a binary and a text mode. Text mode allows character conversion and binary doesn't. If my memory of what I have read isn't faulty, ages ago (in Internet terms), conversion between ASCII and EBCDIC was a common event. These days, most character conversion is only for end-of-line markers:
Unix: 1 byte, LF (0Ah) Mac: 1 byte, CR (0Dh) DOS/Windows: 2 bytes, CR,LF (0Dh,0Ah)
I have exchanged messages with a Mac user in the past[1] and found my ISO-8859-1 accented characters (and other high characters) converted to the Mac character set in his quoted replies (I would type "caf" and the quoted reply would have "caf" or I would type "15" for for "fifteen degrees" and my quoted text in his replies would have "15", for two examples).
[1] about five to seven years ago.
|
Just checked which mode is being used, and it appears I get to choose
between ASCII, binary, EBCDIC, local and auto, and it's set to auto.
On transfer of a text file, it chooses ASCII.
I never had any characters changed in the transfer though (except for
those line-breaks apparently).
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Norman L. DeForest
Jul 12 2005, 09:27 AM
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Els wrote:
QUOTE |
Norman L. DeForest wrote: [snip] I have exchanged messages with a Mac user in the past[1] and found my ISO-8859-1 accented characters (and other high characters) converted to the Mac character set in his quoted replies (I would type "caf" and the quoted reply would have "caf" or I would type "15" for ^^^^ |
Your post also changed one of my characters from CP1252 to
ISO-8859-15. You quote "caf" ("caf" + hex B4) where I had posted
"caf" ("caf" + hex 8E). It's Z with caron in both respective
character sets but, since Pine doesn't attempt to convert character
sets, the quoted character shows up for me as an accute accent.
QUOTE |
for "fifteen degrees" and my quoted text in his replies would have "15", for two examples).
[1] about five to seven years ago.
Just checked which mode is being used, and it appears I get to choose between ASCII, binary, EBCDIC, local and auto, and it's set to auto. On transfer of a text file, it chooses ASCII. I never had any characters changed in the transfer though (except for those line-breaks apparently).
|
--
Norman De Forest
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~af380/Profile.html[Email Removed] [=||=] (A Speech Friendly Site)
"We put up with each other's vices. She smokes, I eviscerate. I'm trying
to quit." -- the Inspector General in _Under_the_Healing_Sign_
Els
Jul 12 2005, 09:33 AM
Norman L. DeForest wrote:
QUOTE |
and the quoted reply would have "caf" or I would type "15" for ^^^^ Your post also changed one of my characters from CP1252 to ISO-8859-15. You quote "caf" ("caf" + hex B4) where I had posted "caf" ("caf" + hex 8E). It's Z with caron in both respective character sets but, since Pine doesn't attempt to convert character sets, the quoted character shows up for me as an accute accent.
|
That must be on your end afaics, because in my post, quoting your
text, I read "caf". It's in your reply only that I see the change in
the bit I quoted.
--
Els
http://locusmeus.com/Sonhos vem. Sonhos vo. O resto imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Stefan Walker
Jul 12 2005, 11:04 AM
DBLEXPOSURE wrote:
QUOTE |
I have been using an ftp client call netload. Is no longer supported.
Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and up load only the new files.
My directories are huge. WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.
All suggestions are appreciated
PZ
www.weisd.com
http://e-parts.netfirms.com
http://imagequest.netfirms.com
Site Publisher? |
Todd H.
Jul 12 2005, 12:46 PM
"Alan Apperson" <[Email Removed]> writes:
QUOTE |
If your using DW , just synch the files and this will be done automatically
|
DW as in Dreamweaver? It's got the shittiest most unreliable, built
in FTP client in the industry. The thing drives me friggin nuts.
If his needs are choking WS-FTP Pro, DW's ftp client doesn't stand a
chance.
--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/
Todd H.
Jul 12 2005, 12:48 PM
Els <[Email Removed]> writes:
QUOTE |
Blinky the Shark wrote:
Els wrote:
vs non-existent, or difference in date or filesize. I never check for filesize though, as for some reason files on the server are a few bytes off compared to local files, and checking for date differences
Different file systems?
As in my pc runs WinXP and the server is a Linux box? Yep :-) (never knew that would effect the filesize...)
|
Yeah, you may notice that the differences occur only in text files
(.html) and not binary files (.jpg). The reason is that the windows
world ends line with a carriage return and line feed whiel the unix
file format doesn't feel the need to terminate lines with that extra
^M.
Best Regards,
--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/
Edwin van der Vaart
Jul 13 2005, 08:34 AM
DBLEXPOSURE wrote:
QUOTE |
I have been using an ftp client call netload. Is no longer supported.
Does any know of a good client that will compare local and remote files and up load only the new files.
My directories are huge. WS_ftp pro chokes on the large directories.
All suggestions are appreciated Smartftp? |
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.