Help - Search - Member List - Calendar
Full Version: for Fred Doyle
WorkTheWeb Forums > Webmaster Resources > General Graphics Design Help
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57
Support our Sponsors!
Aratzio
in article [Email Removed], FakeRatzo at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 11:46 PM:

QUOTE
Possible they may be related (echhhh) .


Not every family is as inbred as your family, FakeRatzo.

Aratzio
in article [Email Removed], Aratzio at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 11:55 PM:

QUOTE
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:40:40 -0700, Aratzio <[Email Removed]> got
double secret probation because:

in article [Email Removed], Aratzio at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 11:37 PM:



Hey try this, frog Jeremy or
Andrew they love that kind of stuff.


Your fantasies are not everyone's.  Do your own work.



So why not frog them, they are the ones you are after? ...

Your desires are not mine. Time for you to go to bed and dream of frogs.

":^)

AlwaysCorrect
in article [Email Removed], Aratzio at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 11:55 PM:


QUOTE
Still it is
pretty damn weak.


"Weak" or not, you come back for more. It must be good enough for you.

":^)

DE
Aratzio wrote:
QUOTE
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 21:31:05 -0700, [Email Removed] got double secret
probation because:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 21:21:56 -0700, Aratzio <[Email Removed]
wrote:

BTW oh king of the spelling lame, what's a vender?

Ouch Mikey That had to of hurt. Do you want some Bactine for that?

It is so sad when they play the lame cards and then get fed the deck.

And flaying himself in public. Not a pretty sight.

I do like the "I will run my business into the ground on my terms and
you cannot stop me" attitude.

Unfortunately it happens every day.

My brother-in-laws brother is a Federal Bankruptcy judge down in your
end of the state. He was telling some stories last Christmas about
some of the people who end up in front of him. It is truly sad that
some of these people are allowed out of their homes, let alone run
businesses. Well it is actually corporations that end up in front of
him but the people who run the corporations. WorldCom, Tyco, Adelphia
are big names you hear all about. The small players who do that kind
of stuff are a dime a dozen.

But lucky for Mike he does not have any stockholders to sue his ass
into bankruptcy for malfeasance. You imagine if Mikey was public
corporation and he pulled this stunt. Shareholders suits would just be
the beginning of his woes.

'Ratz

Now, now ... one of the few remaining actual terrific things about this
country is that anyone can start a business, anyone can blow it or make
a success of it (depending on their talents, savvy, willingness to work
hard, etc.) and anyone else can venture a totally meaningless opinion
about what that person *ought* to be doing with their business.

This particular comment of yours .... well .... you wouldn't want to
seriously think about how close it is to You-no-hooey's typical
comments, would you? I mean, it's easy for some people to THINK they
know how someone else should run their business, but doing it from the
inside -- when it's your name & resources on the line -- is a whole
different thing.

So, much as I think (*this*) Mike is a totally a** in many respects,
he's perfectly within his rights to screw up his business any ol' way he
wants to.

[... oh, and I hope you're not *really* playing "king of the spelling
lame", 'ratz, cuz .... well .... you know ...... ]

-- DE

Good Point
QUOTE
I know that based on what I have read the last day or so I would never
engage Mike for any artistic needs...

Too true.
And the word is getting around what a rip-off con-artist he is.

He has been trolling and spamming and scamming for far too long. Glad
to see that news providers are waking up to his anti-American
activities.

AlwaysCorrect
in article [Email Removed], Good Point at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 12:19 AM:

QUOTE
Glad
to see that news providers are waking up to his anti-American
activities.


hahahahahaha.

You're funny.

Mike...
in article [Email Removed], Good Point at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 12:19 AM:

QUOTE
I know that based on what I have read the last day or so I would never
engage Mike for any artistic needs...

Too true.
And the word is getting around what a rip-off con-artist he is.

He has been trolling and spamming and scamming for far too long.  Glad
to see that news providers are waking up to his anti-American
activities.


Got any evidence to back up your assertions? Are you an Supernews employee?

(Assertion: Something declared or stated positively, often with no support
or attempt at proof.)


--
Mike

* Logo Design *
Put some fun in your next logo!

Site at: http://www.artistmike.com

Calendar
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
Got any evidence to back up your assertions?


Christy, it is a pity you have lost your memory as well as conscience.

Try Google groups. All your trollboy crap is archived there for all
to see.

Little wonder that finally news providers are waking up to what a
useless old phony you are.

John Henry
Hi, Aratzio! This is a friendly line to let people know who I'm talking
to!

QUOTE
in article [email protected], John
Henry at [Email Removed] wrote
on 04/10/2004 10:11 PM:


I'm kinda hoping the dumb bastard forges me - then he can lose
another account.


How sweet of you to share you little hopes and desires.

Hey, it's not my fault you're a lifeless pile of dogshit.

QUOTE
Move on.

Fuck off.

--
John Henry
www.lowgenius.com
If I were you, I'd be listening to nothing

Anthony Edwards
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:10:24 -0400, Zimphire <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
Er, they are the one that pays for the server. Of COURSE they are
allowed.

No, they are not. If Supernews staff ever did begin to post
substantively identical articles in contravention of commonly accepted
Usenet spam thresholds in order to advertise the Supernews service
in their signatures (or in any other way), I and many other existing
Supernews subscribers would cancel our accounts, and would no doubt
lead the clamour for a UDP until they saw the error of their ways.

That has never happened, and there is no chance of it ever happening
whilst Supernews is operated by its current management and employs
its existing staff, though.

--
Anthony Edwards
[Email Removed]

Aratzio
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:58:24 -0700, Aratzio <[Email Removed]> got
double secret probation because:

QUOTE
in article [Email Removed], Aratzio at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 11:55 PM:

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:40:40 -0700, Aratzio <[Email Removed]> got
double secret probation because:

in article [Email Removed], Aratzio at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 11:37 PM:



Hey try this, frog Jeremy or
Andrew they love that kind of stuff.


Your fantasies are not everyone's.  Do your own work.



So why not frog them, they are the ones you are after? ...

Your desires are not mine.  Time for you to go to bed and dream of frogs.

":^)



Don't you wish you actually were a man, not some 10 year old having a

temper tantrum. A man could deal with his problems directly, you just
sleeze around and dull people into submission. You and the 'Tard
deserve each other. I think we have a movie here. Dull and Duller, The
Story of Mikey and the Tard. Except no one could write the script, be
impossible to stay awake while writing.

'Ratz


--

A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz
Accept No Substitute

Willem
Lord Pander <[Email Removed]> wrote
news:[Email Removed]

QUOTE
When one has users like "Omnima" who tell in their posts
that they do fake headers and posts about many of the
people he does not like (including you Mike), how can it
be justified by supernews that they block people like you
after not looking close at the headers at all. The quoted
post was from a windows box, not a Mac for example. Way
to do your jobs over there people. LP.

That happens a lot in Holland too, posters set someone up
and post in his/her name. But I never heard of a Dutch
provider banning someone for fake posts they didn't make,
probably they have better logs to verify. Usually these
flame wars are just ignored by them, they don't get
personally involved like the Supernews people. But Demon
outsources to Supernews, that is how we came to know about
this case.

You post from Supernews. Aren't you afraid they will find a
reason to block you too when you write these words?

WJ
--
http://www.demon.nl/eng/support/newsgroups/index.html
http://tinyurl.com/yuxgq
http://tinyurl.com/yvrmo

Willem
Lord Pander <[Email Removed]> wrote
news:[Email Removed]

QUOTE
Oh so many victims of the supernews power
trips. Well who can we get blocked today? Hum let me see
how about I use your headers to do some spamming? Or
being that they will not even look at the headers, I will
just use your email address and nick or something stupid
like that. LP.

That is my impression too from all this. It has been said
for a longer time, but this example of Mike is very
convincing that Supernews listens to the wrong posters and
doesn't have good logs to verify who spams from their
server.

WJ
--
http://www.demon.nl/eng/support/newsgroups/index.html
http://tinyurl.com/yuxgq
http://tinyurl.com/yvrmo

Aratzio
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 00:11:27 -0700, DE <[Email Removed]> got double
secret probation because:

QUOTE
Aratzio wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 21:31:05 -0700, [Email Removed] got double secret
probation because:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 21:21:56 -0700, Aratzio <[Email Removed]
wrote:

BTW oh king of the spelling lame, what's a vender?

Ouch Mikey That had to of hurt. Do you want some Bactine for that?

It is so sad when they play the lame cards and then get fed the deck.

And flaying himself in public. Not a pretty sight.

I do like the "I will run my business into the ground on my terms and
you cannot stop me" attitude.

Unfortunately it happens every day.

My brother-in-laws brother is a Federal Bankruptcy judge down in your
end of the state. He was telling some stories last Christmas about
some of the people who end up in front of him. It is truly sad that
some of these people are allowed out of their homes, let alone run
businesses. Well it is actually corporations that end up in front of
him but the people who run the corporations. WorldCom, Tyco, Adelphia
are big names you hear all about. The small players who do that kind
of stuff are a dime a dozen.

But lucky for Mike he does not have any stockholders to sue his ass
into bankruptcy for malfeasance. You imagine if Mikey was public
corporation and he pulled this stunt. Shareholders suits would just be
the beginning of his woes.

'Ratz

Now, now ... one of the few remaining actual terrific things about this
country is that anyone can start a business, anyone can blow it or make
a success of it (depending on their talents, savvy, willingness to work
hard, etc.) and anyone else can venture a totally meaningless opinion
about what that person *ought* to be doing with their business.


Reading problems DE? Where did I say it was a bad idea to run a small
business? I did it for a while, could still be doing it but I HATE
sales and marketing. I am not happy doing that end of the business so
why should I. Next time make sure you read the context not what you
think I wrote.

QUOTE
This particular comment of yours .... well .... you wouldn't want to
seriously think about how close it is to You-no-hooey's typical
comments, would you?  I mean, it's easy for some people to THINK they
know how someone else should run their business, but doing it from the
inside -- when it's your name & resources on the line -- is a whole
different thing.

Hmmm, DE since when does my writing lack the coherence of the 'Tard?

Go read that again...

QUOTE
So, much as I think (*this*) Mike is a totally a** in many respects,
he's perfectly within his rights to screw up his business any ol' way he
wants to.


Where did anyone say he could not? I just pointed out he is lucky he
is private...

QUOTE
[... oh, and I hope you're not *really* playing "king of the spelling
lame", 'ratz, cuz .... well .... you know ...... ]

Having context issues now? I asked a question of someone who was

playing the spelling lame game.

QUOTE
-- DE

Go have more coffee please. You obviously are still asleep.




--

A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz
Accept No Substitute

Zimphire
In article <BC9E05E9.F2E0A%[Email Removed]>,
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote:


QUOTE
I paid for the service, I intended to use the service.  After the fact they
make rules up as they go along, "Mike" posts too many messages.

hahahahaha.


They post just as many messages as I do in a day... and they have their link
in each message.  But it is not ok for me to do the same, because they don't
like my "attitude" or they don't like the topics that I choose to post
about, or they don't like getting crybabies writing to them about my "mean"
messages.

Tough.

They are out of the loop now.

You sound like a big crybaby.

Do you need some sugar tit?

AlwaysCorrect
in article 4079532d$0$85244$[Email Removed], Willem at
gaatjenietaan@notvalid@ac wrote on 04/11/2004 7:15 AM:

QUOTE
Uni <[Email Removed]> wrote
news:[Email Removed]
rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
[alt.binaries.news-server-comparison added to NG line]

Since the Supernews admins hang out in abn-s-c, I'll
let them tell you michael if this is spam. Katra has in
her .sig a link to

http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?View...lude=0&userid=k
atra.
AFAIK none of her posts have been made specifically to
sell her beads and such. She merely has a link to her
commercial site in her .sig.

Anyone from Supernews care to reply? Note that I
assume I know what the answer will be, and this is for
michael's benefit.

I've seen many Supernews subscribers that post a URL to a
product and/or service. Mike, has also done this.
However, Mike does, in his own cute way, ruffle a few
feathers in usenet. I assume, someone complained to
Supernews about Mike, and Supernews took immediate steps
to put a stop to Mike. And, how many real spammers (who
never say a word) will argue with a NSP in this very
group? Case closed.

Many posters have much longer urls for their business or
classes in their posts. Supernews staff does it too. Still
Supernews is the first that says this is a reason to block
their customers for it.

And you know what, Supernews is used for leeching and
uploading a lot over here. All the time you see urls in the
binary floods, also in subject headers. Gigantic quantities
of urls compared to a poster who just posts some text
messages with his url to sign off.

WJ
--
http://www.demon.nl/eng/support/newsgroups/index.html
http://tinyurl.com/yuxgq
http://tinyurl.com/yvrmo



Exactly so.

Zimphire
In article <[Email Removed]>,
Aratzio <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 21:07:22 -0700, [Email Removed] got double secret
probation because:

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 20:38:06 -0700, "Mike..." <[Email Removed]
wrote:

in article [Email Removed], [Email Removed] at [Email Removed]
wrote on 04/10/2004 8:13 PM:

Glad that you don't want me to put
you on the approved vendor list. Trust me I won't.  };-


My opinions in newsgroups are not for sale.  I don't care what you "had to
offer" in the way of being on an approved "vender list".

BTW oh king of the spelling lame, what's a vender?


I have been willing to write as I wish in newsgroups for years, and am still
willing to pay the price that silly people like you think I should pay.

Sounds to me that is the reason why after all of these years you are
still struggling.

J.P.

And flaying himself in public. Not a pretty sight.

I do like the "I will run my business into the ground on my terms and
you cannot stop me" attitude.

From the looks of his work, I doubt he really had a business.

dave
in article 4079532e$0$85244$[Email Removed], Willem at
gaatjenietaan@notvalid@ac wrote on 04/11/2004 7:16 AM:

QUOTE
Lord Pander <[Email Removed]> wrote
news:[Email Removed]

When one has users like "Omnima" who tell in their posts
that they do fake headers and posts about many of the
people he does not like (including you Mike), how can it
be justified by supernews that they block people like you
after not looking close at the headers at all. The quoted
post was from a windows box, not a Mac for example. Way
to do your jobs over there people. LP.

That happens a lot in Holland too, posters set someone up
and post in his/her name. But I never heard of a Dutch
provider banning someone for fake posts they didn't make,
probably they have better logs to verify. Usually these
flame wars are just ignored by them, they don't get
personally involved like the Supernews people. But Demon
outsources to Supernews, that is how we came to know about
this case.

You post from Supernews. Aren't you afraid they will find a
reason to block you too when you write these words?

WJ
--
http://www.demon.nl/eng/support/newsgroups/index.html
http://tinyurl.com/yuxgq
http://tinyurl.com/yvrmo





Supernews is starting to be known as a news provider that is full of censors
and power junkies, that will block your account for almost anything.

Zimphire
In article <BC9E0C1D.F2E1D%[Email Removed]>,
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
I know I am.  I have been "winning" these types of little games for years.

Someone, hurry, post a pic with a bird with his head in the sand.

Zimphire
In article <BC9E113A.F2E23%[Email Removed]>,
AlwaysCorrect <[Email Removed]> wrote:


QUOTE
If you allow yourself to be disturbed by "Mike's" messages, then you are
choosing to be a victim.  Who's fault is that?

100% silliness.

Zimphire
In article <BC9E34E4.F2EC0%[Email Removed]>,
Aratzio <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
in article [email protected], John Henry at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004
10:11 PM:


I'm kinda hoping the dumb bastard forges me - then he can lose another
account.


How sweet of you to share you little hopes and desires.

Move on.

So how many accounts are you using mikee?

Zimphire
In article <BC9E25F7.F2E84%[Email Removed]>,
AlwaysCorrect <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
in article [Email Removed], [Email Removed] at [Email Removed]
wrote on 04/10/2004 10:14 PM:

On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 01:15:03 -0400, Uni <[Email Removed]
wrote:

I've seen many Supernews subscribers that post a URL to a product and/or
service. Mike, has also done this. However, Mike does, in his own cute
way, ruffle a few feathers in usenet. I assume, someone complained to
Supernews about Mike, and Supernews took immediate steps to put a stop
to Mike. And, how many real spammers (who never say a word) will argue
with a NSP in this very group? Case closed.

Uni


A spammer is a spammer, get over it.

J.P.


A bigot and a wanna-be censor are a bigot and a wanna-be censor, get over
it.

pro?jec?tion P Pronunciation Key (pr-jkshn)
n.

a. The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or suppositions to
others

Zimphire
In article <BC9E2DD7.F2E8B%[Email Removed]>,
Aratzio <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
One little incestuous world.  The more power that a few people have, the
more it corrupts them.  Supernews is infested with censors and power
junkies.

In other words

"I am a big crybaby that is upset that I got busted for being an ass. So
now I am going to throw a tantrum"

dave
in article 4079532e$1$85244$[Email Removed], Willem at
gaatjenietaan@notvalid@ac wrote on 04/11/2004 7:16 AM:

QUOTE
Andrew - Supernews <[Email Removed]> wrote
news:[Email Removed]
On 2004-04-10, Willem <gaatjenietaan@notvalid> wrote:
Andrew - Supernews <[Email Removed]> wrote
news:[Email Removed]

I admit that, not being the abuse person here, I have no
idea why the user in question was blocked in the first
place. But it wasn't anything to do with the above post,
which is dated some months after the original block.

How can you say that when Jeremy says it does:

Because Jeremy didn't say that.

Supernews still has not explained why Jeremy quoted the fake
posts at all if they don't have anything to do with the
block. Until they do, Jeremy said it loud and clear.

Jeremy from Supernews says he has VERIFIED these posts
are not forged and that they speak for themselves. So he
means Supernews has proof they were posted by Mike.

He means nothing of the sort
(perhaps he should have made this point clearer).

So what DOES Supernews mean when it says it verified that
posts were not forged and speak for themselves.

A customer says he is not the poster of the fake posts, as a
reply Supernews presents more fakes posts and says they are
genuine and speak for themselves.

I say "I did not hide the apple".
Then you show the public an apple and say "this speaks for
itself".
What will 99% of the public think? That you present proof
the apple was hidden by me.

That is what Supernews is doing to Mike.

We _WILL NOT COMMENT_ on the issue
of which of our users made any specific post, or whether
two or more posts were made by the same user, because
that would be a violation of privacy. Naturally, this
means that public discussion of abuse issues is rarely
productive (as this thread demonstrates).

Again you are publicly suggesting the fake posts COULD have
been made by Mike. It is wrong to bring up a privacy policy
to imply things about a customer.

Supernews should research and handle this matter in an
honest way and stop implying things with showing fake posts
made with the name of their customers.  Therefore I think
this thread is productive in bringing that out and asking
you to review the matter fairly.

He means they are related to the reason for blocking.

No, that's simply your interpretation of what he meant.

Supernews posted them in reply to their customer's denial he
spammed, and said they spoke for themselves. There is no
other interpretation.

But you from Supernews say something different. What is
going on at Supernews Abuse, Andrew??

What is going on is very simple: we won't violate our
privacy policies simply to "win" a debate in public. If
the "Artist Mike" poster wants his block on posting to be
reviewed, then he can simply get his ISP to contact our
abuse staff. Note: paying customers (that is: individual
subscribers or corporate account holders themselves as
opposed to their end-users) can contact abuse directly,
but end-users of ISP outsource customers are expected to
have their ISP contact us on their behalf.

Your privacy policy is not the issue. Supernews blocked a
customer based on fake posts. Supernews even posted some
examples, adding they were NOT forgeries and spoke for
themselves. The issue is that Supernews blocks innocent
customers based on fake posts and maybe even personal
reasons of their employees.

I happen to believe Mike when he says he HAS written to his
ISP and to Supernews. Who wouldn't contact their provider
when they are wrongly blocked?? When I see the way Jeremy
implies things with those fake posts, I can understand Mike
was ON HIS OWN against you guys and you Supernews wasn't
fair about it so he posted about the matter. I would too.

Neither individual subscribers nor outsource end-users
ever get their posting privileges revoked lightly. But it
should be obvious that the vast majority of people who
_do_ get blocked will claim that they were in fact
blocked falsely: either because they were genuinely
innocent, or because they are intentionally spamming and
therefore lying about it, or they are guilty of some form
of abuse other than simple spamming and believem for
whatever reason, that their conduct was justified.

There goes Supernews implying again. "It should be obvious".
Supernews, I'm sorry but it is becoming more and more
obvious that this matter of your logs leading to wrong
blocks is not handled in an honest way.

(As an example of such justification, see the assertion
that's been made several times in this thread that simply
being a paying customer confers some sort of right to use
our service for promotional purposes - which is
absolutely not the case.)

That has nothing to do with the block for posts someone
didn't make. Supernews keeps mixing it up, the customer is
trapped: now he got blocked for spamming, now he got blocked
for fake posts.

WJ
--
http://www.demon.nl/eng/support/newsgroups/index.html
http://tinyurl.com/yuxgq
http://tinyurl.com/yvrmo








All good questions that Supernews will not answer because they have no
reason to answer such questions. They are above answering such questions.
They make the rules, and if you don't like the rules, you can go screw a
light socket. They just don't care. They are big enough that one paying
customer ... even one that makes noise in a few newsgroups... will not be a
problem for them. They don't care.

If a person decides to pay for their services, or their ISP happens to
choose them for news service... that person has better be aware that
Supernews can and does block people that they don't like. They use fake
messages as an excuse, or they just make a rule if they need it.

That is how they do business.

dave
in article [Email Removed], Aratzio at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 7:06 AM:


QUOTE
I wish I was a man.


Your "wishes" are irrelevant.

dave
in article [Email Removed], Zimphire at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 8:26 AM:


QUOTE
From the looks of his work, (ArtistMike.com) he really has a good business.


I am sure Mike will appreciate that.

reverend maxwell snort
In article <BC9E113A.F2E23%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
QUOTE
in article [Email Removed], Zimphire at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 8:09 PM:

In article <BC9DC09E.F2D10%[Email Removed]>,
Aratzio <[Email Removed]> wrote:

in article [Email Removed], Aratzio at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 2:59 PM:

He has to resort to nym
shifts ...


Poor baby.  Cry some more... your pain is my joy.

Sadist.

If you allow yourself to be disturbed by "Mike's" messages, then you are
choosing to be a victim.  Who's fault is that?

yours. I hereby declare Sunday to be your fault. everything that goes
wrong or is bad today, anywhere, is your fault.

btw, where do I send the cleaning bill? and the repairs to my car will
just be billed later

dave
in article [email protected], John Henry at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004
6:35 AM:


QUOTE
Hey, it's not my fault I am a lifeless pile of dogshit.

Who's fault is it?





QUOTE
Move on.

Fuck me.


Your sexual fantasies are not relevant.

reverend maxwell snort
In article <BC9E3A23.F2FBB%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
QUOTE
in article [Email Removed], FakeRatzo at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 11:46 PM:

Possible they may be related (echhhh) .

Not every family is as inbred as your family, FakeRatzo.

well, you're right about that; schizophrenia is not inbred. I can
recommend a good doctor in your area...

dave
in article [Email Removed], Zimphire at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 8:30 AM:


QUOTE
So how many accounts are you using mikee?


Can you count past 5?

reverend maxwell snort
In article <BC9E18CC.F2E3C%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
QUOTE
in article [Email Removed], reverend maxwell
snort at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 8:45 PM:

my own work; my own rules.  you, are a fucking spammer, and a troll.
you will burn in the hell I will make for you, or you will run out
screaming.

shall we play, you arrogant unwit?

Your silly threats are irrelevant.

threats? no. I don't make idle threats. I'm just relating history.
if you wish to learn, then let us play.
if ignorance is bliss, then go away.

reverend maxwell snort
In article <BC9E2705.F2E85%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
QUOTE
in article [Email Removed], [Email Removed] at [Email Removed]
wrote on 04/10/2004 10:06 PM:

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 21:32:39 -0700, AlwaysCorrect
<[Email Removed]> wrote:

in article [Email Removed], [Email Removed] at [Email Removed]
wrote on 04/10/2004 8:25 PM:



The way you are going, you will soon be out of the loop yourself.


Is that a problem for you?


Nopers.

Then you have nothing to whine and cry about.  Move on.  Supernews is
infested with censors that censor customers based upon whim and lies.

did you see the movie "the princess bride"? remember the part where
inigo montoya says to vezzini "you keep using that word. I do not think
it means what you think it means"?

apply the anaolgy, no-wit

dave
in article [Email Removed], reverend maxwell
snort at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 9:15 AM:

QUOTE
In article <BC9E113A.F2E23%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
in article [Email Removed], Zimphire at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 8:09 PM:

In article <BC9DC09E.F2D10%[Email Removed]>,
Aratzio <[Email Removed]> wrote:

in article [Email Removed], Aratzio at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 2:59 PM:

He has to resort to nym
shifts ...


Poor baby.  Cry some more... your pain is my joy.

Sadist.

If you allow yourself to be disturbed by "Mike's" messages, then you are
choosing to be a victim.  Who's fault is that?

yours.


Glad you realize it is not "Mike's" fault. Now all you have to do is clear
up your confusion about it being "Always Correct's" fault.

reverend maxwell snort
In article <BC9E0F2B.F2E20%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
QUOTE
in article [Email Removed], reverend maxwell
snort at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 8:09 PM:
so why don't you shut up and move
on you egocentric nutcase.

Because it is fun to bring bigots and wanna-be censors like you out from
under the rocks.

bigot? please see my previous analogy about not knowing what words
mean. censor? no, you may say anything you like as anysock you like.

please let us say quite a bit to each other. it is good for the game.
will you play?

dave
in article [Email Removed], reverend maxwell
snort at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 9:15 AM:


QUOTE
I hereby declare Sunday to be your fault.




Oh, by the way, Supernews is a crappy news provider.

Just thought you might want to get that correct also.

":^)

reverend maxwell snort
In article <BC9DF748.F2DC0%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
QUOTE
in article [Email Removed], Andrew -
Supernews at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 6:49 PM:
Tough... what you think is bestowed upon a paying customer is irrelevant ...
you are out of the loop now.

that's right; tighten the circle

QUOTE
Your opinions are irrelevant.

all opinons but yours are irrelevent. only you matter. only you exist.
we are all imaginary, created by your own mind only to vex you; remind
you where sanity lies.

dave
in article 40796e0f$0$85221$[Email Removed], Willem at
gaatjenietaan@notvalid@ac wrote on 04/11/2004 9:11 AM:

QUOTE
IF there really is nothing wrong with the block Supernews
put on Mike, why are there SO many folks hanging out here
taking stabs at him because he posted about it? Why all the
attention for something that everyone says went by the book?



Because they know now that it did not go "by the book". By Supernews' own
admission they used fake messages as a bogus reason to block Mike's posts.

Supernews posted messages that were FAKED AFTER HE WAS BLOCKED. They
attempt to use messages that Mike could NOT have written as evidence of his
"crime".

reverend maxwell snort
In article <BC9E25F7.F2E84%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
QUOTE
in article [Email Removed], [Email Removed] at [Email Removed]
wrote on 04/10/2004 10:14 PM:

On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 01:15:03 -0400, Uni <[Email Removed]
wrote:

I've seen many Supernews subscribers that post a URL to a product and/or
service. Mike, has also done this. However, Mike does, in his own cute
way, ruffle a few feathers in usenet. I assume, someone complained to
Supernews about Mike, and Supernews took immediate steps to put a stop
to Mike. And, how many real spammers (who never say a word) will argue
with a NSP in this very group? Case closed.

Uni

A spammer is a spammer, get over it.

A bigot and a wanna-be censor are a bigot and a wanna-be censor, get over
it.

you keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.

dave
in article [Email Removed], reverend maxwell
snort at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 9:22 AM:


QUOTE
threats?  no.  I don't make idle threats.  I'm just relating history.
if you wish to learn, then let us play.
if ignorance is bliss, then go away.


My guess is that you will have to do much better if you are going to get him
to "go away".

dave
in article [Email Removed], reverend maxwell
snort at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 9:22 AM:


QUOTE
threats?  no.  I don't make idle threats.  I'm just relating history.
if you wish to learn, then let us play.
if ignorance is bliss, then go away.


Oh, by the way, your threat has been archived.

Just a reminder.

reverend maxwell snort
In article <[Email Removed]>,
[Email Removed] says...
QUOTE
PKB

Actually projection of self doubt and fears. But PKB works.

the cracks show everywhere. soon each of us will have a time-share in
his brain.

Mike...
in article [Email Removed], reverend maxwell
snort at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 9:39 AM:

QUOTE
In article <BC9DF748.F2DC0%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
in article [Email Removed], Andrew -
Supernews at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 6:49 PM:
Tough... what you think is bestowed upon a paying customer is irrelevant ...
you are out of the loop now.

that's right; tighten the circle

Your opinions are irrelevant.

all opinons but yours are irrelevent.


That is not what was written. That may be what you wish was written but
that was not what was written.

Thank you for sharing your little fantasy. I am sure someone liked it.

":^)


--
Mike

* Logo Design *
Put some fun in your next logo!

Site at: http://www.artistmike.com

reverend maxwell snort
In article <BC9E2DD7.F2E8B%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
QUOTE
One little incestuous world.

was it your mother, your sister, or your daughter?

QUOTE
The more power that a few people have, the
more it corrupts them.  Supernews is infested with censors and power
junkies.

your mind is infected with green bile eating away at the neurons. soon
there will be a big worm laying eggs in all the cracks and crevices. It
will tunnel to the middle and die. soon after that there will be many
little worms trying to get out. they will be hungry.

Jeremy Nixon - Supernews
Mike... <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
Oh, by the way... I like all this discussion in public, and I like how it is
being archived in google.  Keep it up, Supernews.

Yeah, on this I think we can agree. Having someone like you throw a tantrum
in public only makes us look better. Thanks.

--
Jeremy | [Email Removed]

AlwaysCorrect
in article [Email Removed], reverend maxwell
snort at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 9:51 AM:


QUOTE
your mind is infected with green bile eating away at the neurons.  soon
there will be a big worm laying eggs in all the cracks and crevices.  It
will tunnel to the middle and die.  soon after that there will be many
little worms trying to get out.  they will be hungry.


Thank you for sharing your personal fantasies. I am sure you mommy will
just adore them.

reverend maxwell snort
In article <[Email Removed]>,
[Email Removed] says...
QUOTE
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 22:56:29 -0700, [Email Removed] got double secret
probation because:

On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 01:48:41 -0400, Uni <[Email Removed]
wrote:

Let's see. JP is friends with Mike @ Octanews. Mike @ Octanews is
friends with Supernews..... yada, yada, yada.

One little world, here.

:-D

Uni
Yepers We are all out to get you. A conspiracy per say. Just for you
and your sock puppets.
Right Mike?  };-

J.P.

IT IS THE CABAL (tinc) and they are out to  get Mikey & the 'Tard

Cue Twilight Zone Theme

no, no twilight zone music, just the thwopping of the black helicopters.
the music starts later and comes from the speakers suspended beneath.
then the rockets glare red...

(wait, sorry; tinc)

reverend maxwell snort
In article <[Email Removed]>,
[Email Removed] says...
QUOTE
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 03:37:36 GMT, reverend maxwell snort
<[Email Removed]> got double secret probation because:

In article <[Email Removed]>,
[Email Removed] says...
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:04:57 -0400, Zimphire <[Email Removed]> got double
secret probation because:

In article <[Email Removed]>,
reverend maxwell snort <[Email Removed]> wrote:

In article <BC9D913F.F2953%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
darn.  you guys mean your troll has been filtered by his NSP?  UDP'd?
that's a shame.  I had so looked forward to meeting him.

I am here, just watching.

cool; so you are the resident troll?

Yes, yes he is.

Damn, you guys need a MUCH better quality troll. This one is DULL!!!
Please tell me you have something anything more entertaining than
ArtistMike and his sidekick the Unitard?

it's almost like he's not a troll, but just an asshole spammer.  have
you tried to work him into a frenzy?

He has a wand of dullness and uses it on himself. That or thorazine.

so, he's already nuts; let's just enhance that.

reverend maxwell snort
In article <BC9E11A1.F2E24%[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed]
says...
QUOTE
Move on.

c'mon; focus, focus...
we have plant eating heads to feed

Jeremy Nixon - Supernews
dave <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
Supernews posted messages that were FAKED AFTER HE WAS BLOCKED.  They
attempt to use messages that Mike could NOT have written as evidence of his
"crime".

If you look at the posts, you'll notice that they were deliberately
constructed to bypass the block.

--
Jeremy | [Email Removed]

Mike...
in article [Email Removed], Jeremy Nixon - Supernews at
[Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 9:55 AM:

QUOTE
Mike... <[Email Removed]> wrote:

Oh, by the way... I like all this discussion in public, and I like how it is
being archived in google.  Keep it up, Supernews.

Yeah, on this I think we can agree.  Having someone like you throw a tantrum
in public only makes us look better.  Thanks.


Then you will not mind sharing your evidence of my "crime" in public. By
the way, you will have to do much better than reposting fakes messages that
were done after I was blocked from using your service.

Care to post your evidence of my "spamming"?

Or are you just going to hide behind your "policy" again?


--
Mike

* Logo Design *
Put some fun in your next logo!

Site at: http://www.artistmike.com


PHP Help | Linux Help | Web Hosting | Reseller Hosting | SSL Hosting
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2006 Invision Power Services, Inc.