LMAO! Funniest thing I've read in this thread! And just in case you
don't know, this Roy is just another incarnation of the very troll you
guys have been talking about. You don't even need to check headers,
you can easily tell by the nature of its messages. The only ones who
defend it are its own socks.

--
Alex

Only if some besides Aratzio wins.

Watch it, Roy. Becky may throw the book at you. Nothing legally, mind
you, just the tons of books she wrote that didn't sell.

:-)

Uni

Newsgroups allow for filtering of "annoying" people. You can't become
annoyed unless you allow it to happen.

You are responsible for what you choose to read and what you choose to feel
as a result of reading those words.

The author is not responsible for what YOU choose to feel.

None of which is against the law. So get over it.

Not possible in a newsgroup.

You are being overly dramatic.

Your choices of where the "line" is drawn is irrelevant.

What you choose to believe is up to you. It is not my concern.

Oh Mummy tard, I think he's gonna cry.

Will hello!!! That's FabULoUS!!! :)
Hope you both/all are doing great!

She looks adorable! She reminds me of Angelina Jolie. [a compliment, as I think
AJ is really beautiful]
Can't wait to see the little 'Bean'.

Good Luck to you and yours!!!

---
Gem
if you still have my email you can send me some pic!

I especially like Supernews' filtering of annoying people, and will
probably become a subscriber soon.

Filtering you or TOSing you, or dropping posts from Astraweb for not
curbing you isn't against the law, either.

So, run your own newsserver. If you can get a DSL connection with a
static IP, you can contribute to freedom of speech and all sorts of
stuff.

The advice I had from Chris Caputo when I ran a server for some people
he'd TOS'ed was to make sure I kept my options open because the boys
would try all sort of things I hadn't covered in the TOS yet.

Too bad it does not work in total. It just forces them to move to other
news hosts. So your need for someone to filter for you, is not very well
serviced, now is it.

Time for you to whine to someone with more power.

hahahahaha.

Too bad you were too lazy to do it yourself and had to rely on someone else
to do it for you.

hahahahaha.

That has not happened.

Nice that you agree and have no comment.

hahahaha.

Maybe I use the wrong word. Maybe it should be 'standing by'
Uni. Which it certainly has every appearance of, also since
much of what you write in this and other threads involving
Uni does not have to do with opinions, let alone free
speech. If free speech is your main concern, it isn't coming
through. You 'sound' like an automated pro-Uni rifle gone
haywire and it's not doing your noble cause a favor.

I was responding to your own words. It was you who wrote 'If
people can't write as they really think and feel then Free
Speech is not worth much, now is it.'

I think you are mixing things up. Never mind, I still think
this particular case has nothing to do with free speech and
everything with two parties not exactly into integrity. And
where integrity or a fair cause fought with fair means are
absent, anything goes - on both sides.

Joske

They have the means - as Uni has/had them for posting as he
did, and used them. That is all there is to it in this case
of two parties not quite flawless or well-endowed in the
credibility department.

Joske

Or go to places where annoying people don't stay annoying long. <Shrug>

And in the end, those of you who like annoying other people can annoy
each other to your hearts' contents away from all those people who got
tired of you.

I will "stand by" anyone that I think is being unjustly censored. Even if I
don't like what that person writes, or what that person is "in to".

Shrug. I am not going to worry about it too much.

Yes, and I still think it is an accurate opinion.

Police have the means to kill you, but that does not mean that they should
do it. If you think "Uni" has committed a crime, take him to court. Asking
a news provider to censor him because you don't like what he writes is not
valid.

Yes, that is best for you... run away.

Post edit noted, abuse report sent.

Cool!

I'll post edit:

"Calling AM a fuckheaded wank badger and uni a cocking fuck sucker
doesn't mean that we[tinw] think they're two people"

Please do, it needs to spread.

Post edit noted
Morph noted

Abuse report sent.

I bet this free speech site is the slimiest sleeziest pro spammer scummy
site around.

So will I. It seems we have something in common after all!

--
Jeremy | [Email Removed]

Since you are responding to the 'Tard the site probably has to do with
children. AM is the spammer, 'Tard is Pretty Little Girl Pictures.

'Ratz

It's censorship when you don't give your opponent the same "freedom"
you have to express his opinion. Censorship is dictatorship. Dictators
are not what today's world really needs. Today fine men/women give
their lives to exterminate them.

48073.

Is there some reason to care?

Whaaaaaa he said I wrote silly things! Make him stop daddy-news host!

To which you replied:

So I repeated:

And now you state:

So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in
different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a
newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as
shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of
context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the
provider joins in with power play. There is not much anyone
can add in the way of reasonable discourse when people are
on rampages like that - hence my opinion Supernews too is
free to act as it wishes in this particular situation.

Joske

I wrote in full:
They have the means - as Uni has/had them for posting as he
did, and used them. That is all there is to it in this case
of two parties not quite flawless or well-endowed in the
credibility department.

Police is goverment is us the people. A newsprovider is a
(private) business.

Expecting a private business to act as your daddy, that is
as the police who will neutrally come to your aid when you
say you need them, is not realistic. Expecting a private
business to be as trustworthy and neutral as one would like
the police or their daddy to be is laudable but not
realistic either.

It seems to me that is your expectancy, that every(one with)
authority should act like a trustworthy parent one can rely
on while one misbehaves. Should that not work both ways in
the adult world.

As I said, there are more parties involved in this power
rampage to force certain 'rights and wrongs' down each
other's throats, and I see the Supernews staff joining in as
merely one of them. It does not reflect well on them.

Joske

So people vote with their dollars to support the news hosts that most
closely match their needs and philosophy. That is why posting Supernew's
activities in public newsgroups is a good thing. I support that. That is
how people make choices. They see companies in action and decide if they
want to support that action with their dollars.

That is the way it should be.

Writing an opinion about those activities is also allowed.

You being able to see Supernews in action is "all good".

There is no need for me to respond to things and ideas that are not
interesting to me. Thus I don't quote them and I don't respond to them.

If you think that is what he wants to do and you don't like it, take it up
with him.

Yes they did, and in my view overstepped the bounds of a news provider.

They are indeed free to act as they wish, and people are free to make
decisions based upon those actions. Voting with dollars.

I would have it no other way.

While the Ratz is up for the "Kook Groupie Kook of the Month" award.

hahahahaha.

Look at the headers - you are responding to the nymshifting forging
fuckwitted spammer mikey.

No I didn't........

You and Mike's socks?

--
Martin S.

No I didn't

No I didn't

No I don't.

I didn't say any of the above. It was a Uni/AM forgery.

--
Martin S.

Maybe he just likes pissing into the wind.

--
Martin S.

The turd changed his name to Wind ???

You are not the only Martin S. in the world.

hahahahaha.

The turd blows chunks.

--
Martin S.

No one wrote that you did "say" anything... you really don't know how Usenet
works, do you.

Plus you are not the only Martin S. in the world. Not everyone is writing
to you when they write to a "Martin S.".

hahahahaha.

In the interest of semantic accuracy, that should be freedom of the
press. Usenet is publication, as is also a website. This also has more
relevance to semantics. If the feds were actually ever to try going after my
websites (they ain't exactly politically correct), I have little doubt with
a few phone calls I could get major media outlets to provide free legal
counsel. I'm just an ant. However, if the feds actually won People v.
Golaszewski in federal court, this could set a bad precedent that could be
used against big money media outlets.

Impossible on a practical level to censor anyone on Usenet. Just post
elsewhere. Unless someone believes there really IS a Usenet Cabal.
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic DXM, including dangers.
"If I swallow anything evil, put your finger down my throat."
-The Who, "Behind Blue Eyes"

There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power
to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the
power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to
letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue
reflects badly upon us.

--
Jeremy | [Email Removed]

It only reflects "badly" if you don't support free speech , or "free press".

Your fantasies are your own problem, Mr. Canal.

Right. I could sign up today for access through Supernews for 3 bucks a
month. The most SN could do to me is forbid me to post what they considered
unacceptable from their system. SN doesn't seem very powerful to me.
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic DXM, including dangers.
"If I swallow anything evil, put your finger down my throat."
-The Who, "Behind Blue Eyes"

Look into the spinning Supernews hypnodrive. You are getting sleepy,
sleepy. You will purchase the $6.00 SN acount. Go Robert and do not
troll again.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

'Ratz



--

A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz
Accept No Substitute

Why would I pay $6 for what I could get for $3? As I never had any contact
with the abuse folks at SN, I can't imagine they'd care.
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic DXM, including dangers.
"If I swallow anything evil, put your finger down my throat."
-The Who, "Behind Blue Eyes"

WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

As that flys right over the cough syrup kings head.

'Ratz


--

A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz
Accept No Substitute

Neither are you. I noticed you changed your nym after I changed mine.

--
Martin S.

Right, it's easy to tell which are the forgeries.

--
Martin S.

Umm...do you refer to trolling? WHEN did I deny such? ;)
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic DXM, including dangers.
"If I swallow anything evil, put your finger down my throat."
-The Who, "Behind Blue Eyes"