MommyTard wrote:
QUOTE |
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:56:53 -0400, MartinS wrote: Aratzio <[Email Removed]> wrote: As usual el Lameo has to resort to post edits. What a clueless retard. I agree 110%, and I'm unanimous in that. Dear Sirs, I am a twerp. Good-bye. |
QUOTE |
Aratzio wrote: Still a retard Youni, post-edits by you do not change the facts, you are a retard. 'Ratz That's okay, with me. |
QUOTE |
Turdum Obnoxium <[Email Removed]> wrote: Aratzio wrote: Still a retard Youni, post-edits by you do not change the facts, you are a retard. 'Ratz That's okay, with me. Post-edit restored. |
QUOTE |
Mike... wrote: Drew at [Email Removed] wrote: Mike and I have been lovers for years now. I hope he still loves me. You are old and worn, I like new. Like a fish that's lost its flop. |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Drew at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/13/2004 6:57 PM: Mike and I have been lovers for years now. I hope he still loves me. You are old and worn, I like new. ":^) |
QUOTE |
QUOTE |
Drew, Ratz, Martin leave me a few pieces for tomorrow. |
QUOTE |
Turdum Obnoxium <[Email Removed]> wrote: Mike... wrote: Drew at [Email Removed] wrote: Mike and I have been lovers for years now. I hope he still loves me. You are old and worn, I like new. Like a fish that's lost its flop. The Turd knows all about fish, I understand. |
QUOTE |
Uni - PE <[Email Removed]> wrote: Dear Sirs, I am a twerp. Good-bye. Professional Engineers speak the truth. |
QUOTE |
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:52:04 -0400, Martin Sorry <[Email Removed]> wrote: Uni - PE <[Email Removed]> wrote: Aratzio wrote: Still a retard, I am, post-edits by me do not change the facts, I'm still a retard. 'Ratz That's okay, with me. Post-edit restored. Just let me at him. I'm not better than a Professional Engineer, though. -- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USD (US Dummy) 'Ratz Accept No Substitute |
QUOTE |
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:54:53 -0400, MartinS <[Email Removed]> wrote: Turdum Obnoxium <[Email Removed]> wrote: Mike... wrote: Drew at [Email Removed] wrote: Mike and I have been lovers for years now. I hope he still loves me. You are old and worn, I like new. Like a fish that's lost its flop. The Turd knows all about fish, I understand. Interesting the 'Tard shows up, Spammer ArtistMike disappears. |
QUOTE |
-- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime Pathetic 'Ratz Accept No Substitute |
QUOTE |
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:39:43 -0400, Uni <[Email Removed] wrote: Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:38:01 -0400, Uni <[Email Removed] wrote: Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:32:24 -0400, Uni <[Email Removed] wrote: MartinS wrote: I get turned on by watching middle-aged men kiss. Pervert. That's nice to know. :-) Uni As usual, I'm a clueless retard. Don't feel too bad, Ratboy. Things could be worse. Look at DE. :-) Uni You're my favorite Professional Engineer, Uni. That does not change the fact, I am a a retard. 'Ratz That's okay, with me. :-) Uni Back to the bozo bin you lamer. Spammer ArtistMike is enough Lame for any one group. |
QUOTE |
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:54:53 -0400, MartinS <[Email Removed]> wrote: Turdum Obnoxium <[Email Removed]> wrote: Mike... wrote: Drew at [Email Removed] wrote: Mike and I have been lovers for years now. I hope he still loves me. You are old and worn, I like new. Like a fish that's lost its flop. The Turd knows all about fish, I understand. Interesting the 'Tard shows up, Spammer ArtistMike disappears. |
QUOTE |
Okay, then, one more time. There are two "blocks" that have been discussed here over and over and over and over. The first was a block intended to stop the spam, keying on the URL in the posts; the second was a total block on posts coming from Mike's account. And I'm done. No, then there are the Blocks that you were asking about in reference |
QUOTE |
Message-ID: <[Email Removed] X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: [Email Removed] X-DMCA-Complaints-To: [Email Removed] Lines: 10 Xref: sn-us alt.binaries.comp-graphics:270493 This week's Ron and Dave cartoon is now posted at: http://www.ronanddave.com/week/week.htm Enjoy Ron [Email Removed] http://ronsfotos.com http://ronanddave.com http://ronstoons.com |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/13/2004 9:36 PM: Message-ID: <[Email Removed] X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: [Email Removed] X-DMCA-Complaints-To: [Email Removed] Lines: 10 Xref: sn-us alt.binaries.comp-graphics:270493 This week's Ron and Dave cartoon is now posted at: http://www.ronanddave.com/week/week.htm Enjoy Ron [Email Removed] http://ronsfotos.com http://ronanddave.com http://ronstoons.com Oh my.... is that spam? From Supernews? How can it be? |
QUOTE |
It can't possibly be posted each week, and not related to the messages in the newsgroup can it? |
QUOTE |
I don't understand how Supernews can let such a spammer go unchecked and unfiltered and unblocked? They must be getting money as a kickback! |
QUOTE |
For shame! |
QUOTE |
Mike... wrote: in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/13/2004 9:36 PM: Message-ID: <[Email Removed] X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: [Email Removed] X-DMCA-Complaints-To: [Email Removed] Lines: 10 Xref: sn-us alt.binaries.comp-graphics:270493 This week's Ron and Dave cartoon is now posted at: http://www.ronanddave.com/week/week.htm Enjoy Ron [Email Removed] http://ronsfotos.com http://ronanddave.com http://ronstoons.com Oh my.... is that spam? From Supernews? How can it be? Yes, you are correct, Mike. Ron has that Amazon icon linked to the book he and Sally co-wrote. Also, the icon to LVS Online is helpful to drum up business, since he teaches there. Obviously, Supernews does support this type of spam. It can't possibly be posted each week, and not related to the messages in the newsgroup can it? He (Ron) and his brother (Dave) takes turns posting it. Supernews, in my mind, doesn't have issues with spam. They only act when others complain about it, even if it's not spam. I don't understand how Supernews can let such a spammer go unchecked and unfiltered and unblocked? They must be getting money as a kickback! I don't believe they get a kickback. That would not look good for Critical Path. Uni |
QUOTE |
They only act when others complain about it, even if it's not spam. |
QUOTE |
The only deal they get, is the ISP Ron uses, outsources Supernews news. Unfortunately, I just heard Supernews lost an outsourcing account to Giganews. Not sure why, but, obviously, someone wasn't too happy with them. |
QUOTE |
Mike * Logo Design * Put some fun in your next logo! Site at: [spam link deleted] |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/13/2004 10:23 PM: Mike... wrote: in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/13/2004 9:36 PM: Message-ID: <[Email Removed] X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: [Email Removed] X-DMCA-Complaints-To: [Email Removed] Lines: 10 Xref: sn-us alt.binaries.comp-graphics:270493 This week's Ron and Dave cartoon is now posted at: http://www.ronanddave.com/week/week.htm Enjoy Ron [Email Removed] http://ronsfotos.com http://ronanddave.com http://ronstoons.com Oh my.... is that spam? From Supernews? How can it be? Yes, you are correct, Mike. Ron has that Amazon icon linked to the book he and Sally co-wrote. Also, the icon to LVS Online is helpful to drum up business, since he teaches there. Obviously, Supernews does support this type of spam. It can't possibly be posted each week, and not related to the messages in the newsgroup can it? He (Ron) and his brother (Dave) takes turns posting it. Supernews, in my mind, doesn't have issues with spam. They only act when others complain about it, even if it's not spam. I don't understand how Supernews can let such a spammer go unchecked and unfiltered and unblocked? They must be getting money as a kickback! I don't believe they get a kickback. That would not look good for Critical Path. Uni You're probably right... no kickback... but it sure likes they are getting something out of the deal. |
QUOTE |
QUOTE |
The only deal they get, is the ISP Ron uses, outsources Supernews news. Unfortunately, I just heard Supernews lost an outsourcing account to Giganews. Not sure why, but, obviously, someone wasn't too happy with them. |
QUOTE |
And the spammer is who exactly? |
QUOTE |
I no longer see a link to Jasc software, though. Maybe it's because, as Ron said himself, the Paint Shop Pro community is dying. |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/13/2004 10:23 PM: They only act when others complain about it, even if it's not spam. So selective enforcement of an arbitrary rule, based upon whim? Hmmm, sounds like what I have been writing about for a few days now. |
QUOTE |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/13/2004 11:16 PM: The only deal they get, is the ISP Ron uses, outsources Supernews news. Unfortunately, I just heard Supernews lost an outsourcing account to Giganews. Not sure why, but, obviously, someone wasn't too happy with them. I guess the cost would depend on the size of the ISP that they were outsourcing to. Say a small local ISP in a 100,000 population city...with many ISP's in town... I wonder what that would cost. |
QUOTE |
Wow a new trick for the pony. That won't work chuckles as I don't subscribe to supernews my ISP does. You might try my ISP's though [Email Removed] and [Email Removed] perhaps you'll have better luck there trying to stifle my free speech. Ron Lacey. |
QUOTE |
Maybe it depends on the number of subscribers that the ISP has. Maybe they give price breaks for large ISPs and not so good a price for smaller ISPs. |
QUOTE |
Or does it run the other direction? Maybe the more subscribers the ISP has the more it costs to get a news subscriber? Larger ISPs eat up more of the resources of the news provider. |
QUOTE |
OK, I'll pursue it through email but I'm not sure what additional info I can give them or how they can help, (I have "lost" several posts here!) The ISP blames it on "supernews", supernews blames it on "filters" -- I don't post chain letter spams, scams, terrorists, etc. - not the best situation for customer service |
QUOTE |
QUOTE |
Actually, when an outsourcer sells news from their source cheaper than the source, it goes to show you how much they, the source, marks-up their prices. |
QUOTE |
Now, now, Mike, let's not make fun. |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/13/2004 11:31 PM: I no longer see a link to Jasc software, though. Maybe it's because, as Ron said himself, the Paint Shop Pro community is dying. About time those people either got good software or gave it up. ":^) |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/13/2004 11:48 PM: Actually, when an outsourcer sells news from their source cheaper than the source, it goes to show you how much they, the source, marks-up their prices. Ouch. Sort of a "price leader" item to get people to sign up with the ISP. ":^) |
QUOTE |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/13/2004 11:16 PM: The only deal they get, is the ISP Ron uses, outsources Supernews news. Unfortunately, I just heard Supernews lost an outsourcing account to Giganews. Not sure why, but, obviously, someone wasn't too happy with them. I guess the cost would depend on the size of the ISP that they were outsourcing to. Say a small local ISP in a 100,000 population city...with many ISP's in town... I wonder what that would cost. Maybe it depends on the number of subscribers that the ISP has. Maybe they give price breaks for large ISPs and not so good a price for smaller ISPs. |
QUOTE |
Or does it run the other direction? Maybe the more subscribers the ISP has the more it costs to get a news subscriber? Larger ISPs eat up more of the resources of the news provider. |
QUOTE |
Mike... wrote: in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/13/2004 11:16 PM: The only deal they get, is the ISP Ron uses, outsources Supernews news. Unfortunately, I just heard Supernews lost an outsourcing account to Giganews. Not sure why, but, obviously, someone wasn't too happy with them. I guess the cost would depend on the size of the ISP that they were outsourcing to. Say a small local ISP in a 100,000 population city...with many ISP's in town... I wonder what that would cost. Maybe it depends on the number of subscribers that the ISP has. Maybe they give price breaks for large ISPs and not so good a price for smaller ISPs. It depends on the burden the ISP places on the NSP. The greater the burden, the higher the cost. I'm certain deals are made where, if you, the ISP, lessens the burden on the NSP, the NSP will drop their prices. Typically business deals, nothing new. |
QUOTE |
Uni Or does it run the other direction? Maybe the more subscribers the ISP has the more it costs to get a news subscriber? Larger ISPs eat up more of the resources of the news provider. |
QUOTE |
Jeremy Nixon - Supernews <[Email Removed]> wrote news:[Email Removed] Willem <gaatjenietaan@notvalid@ac> wrote: I don't understand. There is an "original block" of Mike BUT if Mike didn't do that later forged spam run, he "would not have been blocked"? Jeremy, unlike you and Rebecca I don't just say people are liars, but I can think they don't understand something or each other, or don't explain things well. So, what you write above is a contradiction to me. Okay, then, one more time. There are two "blocks" that have been discussed here over and over and over and over. The first was a block intended to stop the spam, keying on the URL in the posts; the second was a total block on posts coming from Mike's account. And I'm done. Someone should be able to check what happened here? I still have that question if we can get blocked for a commercial url until this is clear. I find it unfathomable that you could still have this question, after it being explicitly stated repeatedly that there is no policy against such things, period, and there never has been. You sound pissed off Jeremy. I would be too if I had ran my mouth and been caught in giving something away. "Original block". Not "filter", not "I don't know if Mike is blocked" or even "speaks for itself but you don't see me say it's from Mike". I think Americans say "busted" at this point. I will do that instead of calling you a LIAR like you have me at least three times. NEVER underestimate what seems a clueless newbie, a moron, or a sock puppet. |
QUOTE |
They only act when others complain about it, even if it's not spam. So selective enforcement of an arbitrary rule, based upon whim? Hmmm, sounds like what I have been writing about for a few days now. |
QUOTE |
Posting as you wish. Yep. |
QUOTE |
Artist Mike is clearly a spamming trolling nymshift lying fuckwit. AFAIAC SN can do what they like to Artist Mike. If you don't like it don't use SN and try to persuade your ISP to not use SN. (Be careful what you wish for, the Demon.uk newsserver is known for being bad.) |
QUOTE |
One last word. |
QUOTE |
Mike... wrote: Mike * Logo Design * Put some fun in your next logo! Site at: [spam link deleted] And the spammer is who exactly? |
QUOTE |
Hi Mike, Isn't it about time for your annual posting of newsgroup users comments about you? Are you still saving them? Absolutely one of the few things in this group worth looking forward to. Keith. ?`?,,?`?,,?`?,,?`? The New 2004 List ?,,?`?,,?`?,,?`?,,? Version 666.16 13, Tuesday April, 2004 4:28:45 PM --=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=-- ======================================== Past Tributes to "Mike C." http://www.artistmike.com/MC.Tribute/Tribute1.html http://www.artistmike.com/MC.Tribute/Tribute2.html http://www.artistmike.com/MC.Tribute/Tribute3.html ======================================== Thanks Mike, |
QUOTE |
You sound pissed off Jeremy. I would be too if I had ran my mouth and been caught in giving something away. "Original block". Not "filter", not "I don't know if Mike is blocked" or even "speaks for itself but you don't see me say it's from Mike". I think Americans say "busted" at this point. I will do that instead of calling you a LIAR like you have me at least three times. |
QUOTE |
Jeremy Nixon - Supernews <[Email Removed]> wrote news:[Email Removed] Willem <gaatjenietaan@notvalid@ac> wrote: I don't understand. There is an "original block" of Mike BUT if Mike didn't do that later forged spam run, he "would not have been blocked"? Jeremy, unlike you and Rebecca I don't just say people are liars, but I can think they don't understand something or each other, or don't explain things well. So, what you write above is a contradiction to me. Okay, then, one more time. There are two "blocks" that have been discussed here over and over and over and over. The first was a block intended to stop the spam, keying on the URL in the posts; the second was a total block on posts coming from Mike's account. And I'm done. Someone should be able to check what happened here? I still have that question if we can get blocked for a commercial url until this is clear. I find it unfathomable that you could still have this question, after it being explicitly stated repeatedly that there is no policy against such things, period, and there never has been. You sound pissed off Jeremy. I would be too if I had ran my mouth and been caught in giving something away. |
QUOTE |
"Original block". Not "filter", not "I don't know if Mike is blocked" or even "speaks for itself but you don't see me say it's from Mike". I think Americans say "busted" at this point. I will do that instead of calling you a LIAR like you have me at least three times. NEVER underestimate what seems a clueless newbie, a moron, or a sock puppet. WJ |
QUOTE |
Willem <gaatjenietaan@notvalid@ac> wrote: |
QUOTE |
"Original block". Not "filter", not "I don't know if Mike is blocked" or even "speaks for itself but you don't see me say it's from Mike". If you think that I've given something away, |
QUOTE |
or lost something, or anything like that, then fine, I have no problem with that, since no one of consequence will agree with you (I don't even understand what you think I've been "busted" about). So, can we agree to just drop it now? |
QUOTE |
In article <BC9D5603.F288B%[Email Removed]>, Aratzio <[Email Removed]> wrote: in article [Email Removed], Anthony Edwards at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/10/2004 7:34 AM: Supernews' abuse desk staff are extremely competent) is able to draw that distinction. Too bad they used fake messages as a basis for their decision. Aren't all you messages fake? |
QUOTE |
Aratzio wrote: in article 407e3de3$0$17494$[Email Removed], DE at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/15/2004 12:49 AM: in fact, he was the slimeball applauding UFF doing exactly the same thing to me... Post your evidence, crybaby. doing his "what's wrong with that?" when someone's infant was targetted and their presumed home address posted etc. Post your evidence, crybaby. I have no need to post anything in response to your "challenges"; you already provide enough "evidence" with your callousness, your insistent stupidity, your perverted sexuality, and your inability to relate to any adult (most especially women; there's not a single woman you get along with, it's clear.) It's quite clear why you "like" children: you feel dwarfed and incompetent in the company of adults, but perhaps hope that minds that have not fully developed yet will be easier targets for you to convince yourself that you have some superiority over them. Unlike the situation with Supernews, you're not a customer of mine, so I have no compulsion to respond to your stupid games at all, unless it pleases me to do so just to let you feel the pressure rise and to see you resort to the most infantile name-calling because apparently there isn't a creative bone in your body that can come up with anything original or even meaningful. It's absolutely amazing that even with a few years under your belt attempting to troll various groups, you've not yet been able to rise above the "MacDonalds" sort of lame even once. And it's clear that it really TERRIFIES you to have to deal with any woman of intelligence, to the point that you babble and spout and spurt inanities, finally resorting to the infantile tactic of post-editing because you really cannot find words to say anything meaningful, can't even devise an interesting insult no matter how hard you try. What REALLY pleases me, though, is that you've provided such ample evidence, and you continue to provide it, as the noose tightens. It's just delightful to hear someone who fantasizes -- publicly! (albeit apparently with the silly notion that "nobody" is really watching what you say in newsgroups) -- about preying on children, cooperate so thoroughly in bringing about the eventual consequences that will result from your perversions. Perhaps you're operating under the delusion that nobody will care if the pictures you collect and post are not *explicitly* erotic; perhaps you think that you can fool everyone as you once fooled BarB that way. IAC, it's not your party, no matter how loudly you want to insist that you are the one setting the house rules. |
QUOTE |
And as the 'Tard sinks slowly into the sunrise, thus ends another day of its obsession with the Olsen twins. I am guessing that obsession is waning now that they are no longer prepubescent. |
QUOTE |
Shit products never sell. |
QUOTE |
The site samples are unchanged over 5 years |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Andrew - Supernews at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/28/2004 3:45 PM: An entire year of text traffic takes up less space than half a day of binaries. |
QUOTE |
"Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... [Email Removed] news:40912a2d$0$10694$[Email Removed] i have a customer who wants to have "a program that surfs the net and downloads all the uk address details into an act database" ive never i suggested using ukinfodisk or something like that but he's not sold on the idea. its not for spamming, he's employing a telesales person, which i suppose is even more annoying! mark |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Dr. Flonkenstein at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/29/2004 6:43 PM: BTW: what exactly have you to contribute... It is not necessary that a person "contribute" to the newsgroup, |
QUOTE |
just look at you |
QUOTE |
and your messages to see the validity of that fact. Das Slurpfest fangt mal an! |
QUOTE |
":^) |
QUOTE |
PS I should have made myself clearer, I hadn't realised that Mark had cross-posted. Mark is a regular and respected member of alt.design.graphics, and is a graphic designer; hence his post to ADG. Sorry for the misunderstanding, Matt -- Banging your head against a wall uses 150 calories an hour. < @ . > wrote in message news:[Email Removed]... WTF does this have to do with alt.design.graphics????? How many newsgroups did you spam this to? mark | r <[Email Removed]> says... i have a customer who wants to have "a program that surfs the net and downloads all the uk address details into an act database" ive never heard of such a thing, anyone else know of one? Tell your spammer "friend" that nobody here is going to help him to harvest email adresses. alt.design.graphics --- No viruses found in this message. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.672 / Virus Database: 434 - Release Date: 28/4/04 |