"rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski" <[Email Removed]> wrote:
Full Version: for Fred Doyle
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57
| QUOTE |
| "Jeremy Nixon - Supernews" <[Email Removed]> wrote jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. Right. I could sign up today for access through Supernews for 3 bucks a month. The most SN could do to me is forbid me to post what they considered unacceptable from their system. SN doesn't seem very powerful to me. |
Any (well, almost any) NSP will take anyone's money to read usenet
without posting. In fact, there's no need to spend money over and above
your ISP fees to read without posting (or with posting), right, FarC?
--
Martin S.
Jeremy Nixon - Supernews <[Email Removed]> wrote:
| QUOTE |
| jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. |
Defamate? What's that?
| QUOTE |
| There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. |
So, when are you going to exercise it?
--
Martin S.
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:48:47 -0400, MartinS <[Email Removed]> got double
secret probation because:
secret probation because:
| QUOTE |
| Jeremy Nixon - Supernews <[Email Removed]> wrote: jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. Defamate? What's that? |
Shitting on them while calling them names.
| QUOTE |
There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. So, when are you going to exercise it? |
Soon as the 'Tard grows a set of balls and post edits. They will not
do it until he does it after the official warning. That or it is a
realllllly excellent Troll.
'Ratz
MartinS wrote -
| QUOTE |
| Any (well, almost any) NSP will take anyone's money to read usenet without posting. In fact, there's no need to spend money over and above your ISP fees to read without posting (or with posting), right, FarC? |
Yup. Pay for Usenet - unheard of hereabouts!
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:33:59 -0000, Jeremy Nixon - Supernews
<[Email Removed]> wrote:
<[Email Removed]> wrote:
| QUOTE |
| There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. |
I strongly agree Jeremy.
J.P.
Aratzio wrote -
| QUOTE |
| Defamate? What's that? Shitting on them while calling them names. |
That's where spammer mikey's money gets spent.
Jeremy Nixon - Supernews wrote:
| QUOTE |
| jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. |
Your goal is to stop me and only me. No one complained about any text
editing. You fabricated a reason.
Uni
>
Aratzio <[Email Removed]> wrote:
| QUOTE |
| MartinS <[Email Removed]> got double secret probation because: Jeremy Nixon - Supernews <[Email Removed]> wrote: jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. Defamate? What's that? Shitting on them while calling them names. *** |
Oh, I see, a simultaneous combination of defaming and defecating. I
should have realized that.
***
| QUOTE |
| There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. So, when are you going to exercise it? Soon as the 'Tard grows a set of balls and post edits. *** |
How can a twat grow balls?
***
| QUOTE |
| They will not do it until he does it after the official warning. That or it is a realllllly excellent Troll. |
Well, at least somebody's having fun.
--
Martin S.
Uni wrote -
| QUOTE |
| Your goal is to stop me and only me. |
You be quiet and get back to sucking your thumb.
Any more noise from you and you'll be grounded for the weekend.
| QUOTE |
| No one complained about any text editing. You fabricated a reason. |
Go on - you can do it - tell Jeremy you think he's telling lies.
Or you gonna carry on hiding behind mikey the spammer.
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:07:36 -0400, MartinS <[Email Removed]> got double
secret probation because:
secret probation because:
| QUOTE |
| Aratzio <[Email Removed]> wrote: MartinS <[Email Removed]> got double secret probation because: Jeremy Nixon - Supernews <[Email Removed]> wrote: jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. Defamate? What's that? Shitting on them while calling them names. *** Oh, I see, a simultaneous combination of defaming and defecating. I should have realized that. *** There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. So, when are you going to exercise it? Soon as the 'Tard grows a set of balls and post edits. *** How can a twat grow balls? |
That's the point, it cannot so it will remain paralyzed with fear and
simply whine about how Supernews abuses it. The crybaby duo of the
'Tard and Spammer ArtistMike
You did see this:
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
| QUOTE |
| *** They will not do it until he does it after the official warning. That or it is a realllllly excellent Troll. Well, at least somebody's having fun. |
Sure, I have had a couple nice trolls develop, picked up probably at
least one point towrds Usenet Valhalla (maybe 2), got to piss on the
'Tard and Spammer Artist Mike. All the while the 'Tard squrms and
whines while Mike socks up, pussiess out and tries to change subjects
or distract from the real issues. Pretty much a good couple days of
free entertainment at the 'Tard's and Spammer Mike's expense.
My compliments to SuperNews, you have provided a nice diversion from
the normal dull fair of a.b.n-s-c.
Encore Encore !!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 04:08:42 +0100, Far Canal <[Email Removed]> got
double secret probation because:
double secret probation because:
| QUOTE |
| Uni wrote - Your goal is to stop me and only me. You be quiet and get back to sucking your thumb. Any more noise from you and you'll be grounded for the weekend. No one complained about any text editing. You fabricated a reason. Go on - you can do it - tell Jeremy you think he's telling lies. Or you gonna carry on hiding behind mikey the spammer. It just did, SN already said they had a lot of complaints. But you |
know the 'Tard and facts. He would not know a fact if Mike shit it
down its throat.
'Ratz
--
A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz
Accept No Substitute
Uni wrote:
| QUOTE |
| Jeremy Nixon - Supernews wrote: jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. Your goal is to stop me and only me. No one complained about any text editing. You fabricated a reason. |
Joske, I was in supernews.general (private group) when this all
happened. I made one tiny edit, it was humorous, not malicious and no
"damage" was done. Supernews.general is not archived at Google. Paul
Davis, at Supernews, was part of the set-up. He said Supernew's abuse
head, Danhiel Baker, would contact me if I didn't stop. I didn't make
any other changes. I challenged Paul and said, don't talk about it, do
it. A day later, Danhiel sent me a warning via e-mail.
Uni
| QUOTE |
Uni |
Aratzio <[Email Removed]> wrote:
| QUOTE |
| You did see this: http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg |
Yeah, that's the shithead all right.
--
Martin S.
Far Canal wrote:
| QUOTE |
| Uni wrote - Your goal is to stop me and only me. You be quiet and get back to sucking your thumb. Any more noise from you and you'll be grounded for the weekend. No one complained about any text editing. You fabricated a reason. Go on - you can do it - tell Jeremy you think he's telling lies. Or you gonna carry on hiding behind mikey the spammer. |
Hey, Far, think I should construct a web site and post the complaints
about Shared-Secrets and Octanews on it?
:-)
Think Supernews can stop that?
:-)
Uni
| QUOTE |
Uni wrote -
| QUOTE |
| Uni wrote: Uni wrote: Jeremy Nixon - Supernews wrote: jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. Your goal is to stop me and only me. No one complained about any text editing. You fabricated a reason. Joske, I was in supernews.general (private group) when this all happened. I made one tiny edit, it was humorous, not malicious and no "damage" was done. Supernews.general is not archived at Google. Paul Davis, at Supernews, was part of the set-up. He said Supernew's abuse head, Danhiel Baker, would contact me if I didn't stop. I didn't make any other changes. I challenged Paul and said, don't talk about it, do it. A day later, Danhiel sent me a warning via e-mail. Furthermore, Andrew at Supernews mentioned his "boss", Ade, didn't appreciate people replying to me in supernews.gerneral, because of noise, I guess. About a week ago, this was posted in supernews.general: Supernews Support wrote: Welcome to supernews.general! This newsgroup serves as general chat area for our customers. Non-support related topics, rants, raves, flames and character assassination, etc, may be posted here....... In Supernew's own word "flames and character assassination" are acceptable in supernews.general. Many of their users post filth, profanity and such, and Supernews just turns their heads, even though it is a direct violation of their Terms of Service. |
This will change to "I promise to be a good turd in future, please
don't be nasty to me. I can dish it out, but can't take up - except up
the arse from spammer mikey".
Uni wrote:
| QUOTE |
| Uni wrote: Jeremy Nixon - Supernews wrote: jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. Your goal is to stop me and only me. No one complained about any text editing. You fabricated a reason. Joske, I was in supernews.general (private group) when this all happened. I made one tiny edit, it was humorous, not malicious and no "damage" was done. Supernews.general is not archived at Google. Paul Davis, at Supernews, was part of the set-up. He said Supernew's abuse head, Danhiel Baker, would contact me if I didn't stop. I didn't make any other changes. I challenged Paul and said, don't talk about it, do it. A day later, Danhiel sent me a warning via e-mail. |
Furthermore, Andrew at Supernews mentioned his "boss", Ade, didn't
appreciate people replying to me in supernews.gerneral, because of
noise, I guess.
About a week ago, this was posted in supernews.general:
Supernews Support wrote:
| QUOTE |
| Welcome to supernews.general! This newsgroup serves as general chat area for our customers. Non-support related topics, rants, raves, flames and character assassination, etc, may be posted here....... |
In Supernew's own word "flames and character assassination" are
acceptable in supernews.general. Many of their users post filth,
profanity and such, and Supernews just turns their heads, even though it
is a direct violation of their Terms of Service.
Uni
| QUOTE |
Uni Uni |
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:33:59 -0000, Jeremy Nixon - Supernews
<[Email Removed]> wrote:
<[Email Removed]> wrote:
| QUOTE |
| There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. |
Doesn't your TOS state that SN reserves the right to deny or terminate
service to any individual as you so please, without having to furnish
any reason whatsoever? Doesn't everybody else's TOS say the same?
Reminds me of signs in restaurants and retail stores that state this
disclaimer. Some customers are just not worth the hassle of having to
deal with their crap.
--
Alex
"Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]
news:[Email Removed]
| QUOTE |
| rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Right. I could sign up today for access through Supernews for 3 bucks a month. The most SN could do to me is forbid me to post what they considered unacceptable from their system. No, they can terminate your posting privilege, all together. |
Fair point. However, given my posting history in supernews.general without
ever hearing from the abuse dept., I doubt they are that thin skinned. ;)
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic DXM, including dangers.
"If I swallow anything evil, put your finger down my throat."
-The Who, "Behind Blue Eyes"
rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
| QUOTE |
| "Jeremy Nixon - Supernews" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. Right. I could sign up today for access through Supernews for 3 bucks a month. The most SN could do to me is forbid me to post what they considered unacceptable from their system. |
No, they can terminate your posting privilege, all together.
Uni
SN doesn't seem very powerful to me.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 04:39:03 +0100, Far Canal <[Email Removed]> got
double secret probation because:
double secret probation because:
| QUOTE |
| Uni wrote - Uni wrote: Uni wrote: Jeremy Nixon - Supernews wrote: jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. Your goal is to stop me and only me. No one complained about any text editing. You fabricated a reason. Joske, I was in supernews.general (private group) when this all happened. I made one tiny edit, it was humorous, not malicious and no "damage" was done. Supernews.general is not archived at Google. Paul Davis, at Supernews, was part of the set-up. He said Supernew's abuse head, Danhiel Baker, would contact me if I didn't stop. I didn't make any other changes. I challenged Paul and said, don't talk about it, do it. A day later, Danhiel sent me a warning via e-mail. Furthermore, Andrew at Supernews mentioned his "boss", Ade, didn't appreciate people replying to me in supernews.gerneral, because of noise, I guess. About a week ago, this was posted in supernews.general: Supernews Support wrote: Welcome to supernews.general! This newsgroup serves as general chat area for our customers. Non-support related topics, rants, raves, flames and character assassination, etc, may be posted here....... In Supernew's own word "flames and character assassination" are acceptable in supernews.general. Many of their users post filth, profanity and such, and Supernews just turns their heads, even though it is a direct violation of their Terms of Service. This will change to "I promise to be a good turd in future, please don't be nasty to me. I can dish it out, but can't take up - except up the arse from spammer mikey". What a pile of cow flop. Does the 'Tard really believe its own lies? |
Okay I need the original, this looks like another possible K00k award.
Busted Urinal - For Stinking Up The Place
"Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]
news:[Email Removed]
| QUOTE |
| Far Canal wrote: This will change to "I promise to be a good turd in future, please don't be nasty to me. I can dish it out, but can't take up - except up the arse from spammer mikey". Oh, the profanity doesn't bother me. I do know there are many other immature adults, like yourself, in usenet. The use of profanity through Supernew's service, especially in supernews.general, just shows how two faced Supernews is. |
I once actually got LARTed for using profanity in an internal newsgroup
of an ISP that no longer exists. I'll just assume that SN has a clue and
realizes that if any customer finds the word fuck objectionable, they really
don't belong on Usenet.
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic DXM, including dangers.
"If I swallow anything evil, put your finger down my throat."
-The Who, "Behind Blue Eyes"
Far Canal wrote:
| QUOTE |
| Uni wrote - Uni wrote: Uni wrote: Jeremy Nixon - Supernews wrote: jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. Your goal is to stop me and only me. No one complained about any text editing. You fabricated a reason. Joske, I was in supernews.general (private group) when this all happened. I made one tiny edit, it was humorous, not malicious and no "damage" was done. Supernews.general is not archived at Google. Paul Davis, at Supernews, was part of the set-up. He said Supernew's abuse head, Danhiel Baker, would contact me if I didn't stop. I didn't make any other changes. I challenged Paul and said, don't talk about it, do it. A day later, Danhiel sent me a warning via e-mail. Furthermore, Andrew at Supernews mentioned his "boss", Ade, didn't appreciate people replying to me in supernews.gerneral, because of noise, I guess. About a week ago, this was posted in supernews.general: Supernews Support wrote: Welcome to supernews.general! This newsgroup serves as general chat area for our customers. Non-support related topics, rants, raves, flames and character assassination, etc, may be posted here....... In Supernew's own word "flames and character assassination" are acceptable in supernews.general. Many of their users post filth, profanity and such, and Supernews just turns their heads, even though it is a direct violation of their Terms of Service. This will change to "I promise to be a good turd in future, please don't be nasty to me. I can dish it out, but can't take up - except up the arse from spammer mikey". |
Oh, the profanity doesn't bother me. I do know there are many other
immature adults, like yourself, in usenet.
The use of profanity through Supernew's service, especially in
supernews.general, just shows how two faced Supernews is.
Uni
| QUOTE |
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:39:15 -0400, Uni <[Email Removed]>
got double secret probation because:
got double secret probation because:
| QUOTE |
| Uni wrote: Uni wrote: Jeremy Nixon - Supernews wrote: jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. Your goal is to stop me and only me. No one complained about any text editing. You fabricated a reason. |
Let's see, years of complaints about you and your post editting. You
are a liar 'Tard
| QUOTE |
Joske, I was in supernews.general (private group) when this all happened. I made one tiny edit, it was humorous, not malicious and no "damage" was done. |
Let us cover this again: YEARS of lame ass post edits fuckwit not just
one. Which makes you a lying fuckwit again.
| QUOTE |
| Supernews.general is not archived at Google. Paul Davis, at Supernews, was part of the set-up. |
So they entrapped you and made you post edit for years. It was a
conspiracy. What an intriguing fantasy you have created, but fantasy
just the same.
| QUOTE |
| He said Supernew's abuse head, Danhiel Baker, would contact me if I didn't stop. I didn't make any other changes. I challenged Paul and said, don't talk about it, do it. A day later, Danhiel sent me a warning via e-mail. One that has you scared and shaking in your little ballerina slippers |
you coward. (April Coward of the Month)
| QUOTE |
| Furthermore, Andrew at Supernews mentioned his "boss", Ade, didn't appreciate people replying to me in supernews.gerneral, because of noise, I guess. About a week ago, this was posted in supernews.general: Totally irrelevent fuckwit, this is about YEARS you have been post |
editting peoples words and now you have to pay the piper. You are
officially a Usenet Abuser just like your Spammer buddy ArtistMike.
<SNIP Strawman Fuckwittery>
| QUOTE |
| Uni |
I wish I could nominate this fuckwit for the Clueless Newbie of the
Month again but he is the reigning CNotM and cannot be nominated
again.
Maybe he just needs a Busted Urinal Nomination?
'Ratz
--
A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz
Accept No Substitute
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 03:45:22 GMT, Alex K. <[Email Removed]> got double
secret probation because:
secret probation because:
| QUOTE |
| On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:33:59 -0000, Jeremy Nixon - Supernews <[Email Removed]> wrote: There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. Doesn't your TOS state that SN reserves the right to deny or terminate service to any individual as you so please, without having to furnish any reason whatsoever? Doesn't everybody else's TOS say the same? Reminds me of signs in restaurants and retail stores that state this disclaimer. Some customers are just not worth the hassle of having to deal with their crap. |
Yep, all this "free speech" crap is just that, crap. Strawman
arguments and fuckwittery. This is an issue about free commerce and
the right of a business to run their business as they see fit. Which
means they have the right to tell the Unitard to go pound sand up its
ass at any time they wish.
'Ratz
rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
| QUOTE |
| "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Right. I could sign up today for access through Supernews for 3 bucks a month. The most SN could do to me is forbid me to post what they considered unacceptable from their system. No, they can terminate your posting privilege, all together. Fair point. However, given my posting history in supernews.general without ever hearing from the abuse dept., I doubt they are that thin skinned. ;) |
Any way you can prove that? I don't think so.
:-)
I'm all in favor of them disciplining, for whatever reason blows their
skirts up. However, when I'm singled out, it's time to take action.
:-)
Uni
"Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]
news:[Email Removed]
| QUOTE |
| rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Fair point. However, given my posting history in supernews.general without ever hearing from the abuse dept., I doubt they are that thin skinned. ;) Any way you can prove that? I don't think so. :-) |
Yep. All it would take is $3, and me posting in supernews.general using
this e-mail addy. Now that I think about it, it wouldn't even take that. The
SN admins post here. I give my permission to the SN admins to post here if I
have been banned from posting from Supernews.
| QUOTE |
| I'm all in favor of them disciplining, for whatever reason blows their skirts up. However, when I'm singled out, it's time to take action. |
Dude, do you have ANY idea what I used to post in supernews.general? The
SN abuse folks never even contacted me. The lack of substantiated abuse
complaints likely was a factor.
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic DXM, including dangers.
"If I swallow anything evil, put your finger down my throat."
-The Who, "Behind Blue Eyes"
Aratzio wrote:
| QUOTE |
| On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:39:15 -0400, Uni <[Email Removed] got double secret probation because: Uni wrote: Uni wrote: Jeremy Nixon - Supernews wrote: jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. Your goal is to stop me and only me. No one complained about any text editing. You fabricated a reason. Let's see, years of complaints about you and your post editting. You are a liar 'Tard Joske, I was in supernews.general (private group) when this all happened. I made one tiny edit, it was humorous, not malicious and no "damage" was done. Let us cover this again: YEARS of lame ass post edits fuckwit not just one. Which makes you a lying fuckwit again. Supernews.general is not archived at Google. Paul Davis, at Supernews, was part of the set-up. So they entrapped you and made you post edit for years. It was a conspiracy. What an intriguing fantasy you have created, but fantasy just the same. He said Supernew's abuse head, Danhiel Baker, would contact me if I didn't stop. I didn't make any other changes. I challenged Paul and said, don't talk about it, do it. A day later, Danhiel sent me a warning via e-mail. One that has you scared and shaking in your little ballerina slippers you coward. (April Coward of the Month) Furthermore, Andrew at Supernews mentioned his "boss", Ade, didn't appreciate people replying to me in supernews.gerneral, because of noise, I guess. About a week ago, this was posted in supernews.general: Totally irrelevent fuckwit, this is about YEARS you have been post editting peoples words and now you have to pay the piper. You are officially a Usenet Abuser just like your Spammer buddy ArtistMike. <SNIP Strawman Fuckwittery Uni I wish I could nominate this fuckwit for the Clueless Newbie of the Month again but he is the reigning CNotM and cannot be nominated again. Maybe he just needs a Busted Urinal Nomination? 'Ratz -- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz Accept No Substitute |
<post edited>
:-)
Uni
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:17:13 -0400, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"
<[Email Removed]> got double secret probation because:
<[Email Removed]> got double secret probation because:
| QUOTE |
| "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Fair point. However, given my posting history in supernews.general without ever hearing from the abuse dept., I doubt they are that thin skinned. ;) Any way you can prove that? I don't think so. |
Sure they put up with your fuckwittery for years.
| QUOTE |
:-) Yep. All it would take is $3, and me posting in supernews.general using this e-mail addy. Now that I think about it, it wouldn't even take that. The SN admins post here. I give my permission to the SN admins to post here if I have been banned from posting from Supernews. I'm all in favor of them disciplining, for whatever reason blows their skirts up. However, when I'm singled out, it's time to take action. |
You are being singled out because you are:
a. A Usenet Abuser
b. A Liar
c. A Fuckwit
d. A Moron
e. A Clueless Nitwit
f. All Of The Above
I know easy question.
| QUOTE |
Dude, do you have ANY idea what I used to post in supernews.general? The SN abuse folks never even contacted me. The lack of substantiated abuse complaints likely was a factor. |
If I had a sn account I could post the following in sn.general. If the
sn people had a problem and asked me to stop posting such messages I
would. Really simple, their system, their rules and if you do not wish
to abide by how they wish their system run, you are welcome to lose
you posting privileges (PRIVILEDGES not RIGHT) or even have your
account terminated.
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK
rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
| QUOTE |
| "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] Far Canal wrote: This will change to "I promise to be a good turd in future, please don't be nasty to me. I can dish it out, but can't take up - except up the arse from spammer mikey". Oh, the profanity doesn't bother me. I do know there are many other immature adults, like yourself, in usenet. The use of profanity through Supernew's service, especially in supernews.general, just shows how two faced Supernews is. I once actually got LARTed for using profanity in an internal newsgroup of an ISP that no longer exists. I'll just assume that SN has a clue and realizes that if any customer finds the word fuck objectionable, they really don't belong on Usenet. |
Robert, certainly Supernews objects to the use of profanity. However, if
they were to discipline subscribers for it, they'd quickly go out of
business, because most every other NSP allows it.............. now.
Triumph (the insult comic dog), typically found in a Paint Shop Pro
group, said his Supernews posting privileges were suspended for
profanity, some time ago. He switched to Easynews.
Uni
rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
| QUOTE |
| "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Fair point. However, given my posting history in supernews.general without ever hearing from the abuse dept., I doubt they are that thin skinned. ;) Any way you can prove that? I don't think so. :-) Yep. All it would take is $3, and me posting in supernews.general using this e-mail addy. Now that I think about it, it wouldn't even take that. The SN admins post here. I give my permission to the SN admins to post here if I have been banned from posting from Supernews. I'm all in favor of them disciplining, for whatever reason blows their skirts up. However, when I'm singled out, it's time to take action. Dude, do you have ANY idea what I used to post in supernews.general? The SN abuse folks never even contacted me. The lack of substantiated abuse complaints likely was a factor. |
Like I said, I'm being singled out. Your posts may have been much worse
than mine, but SN didn't have a bug up their behind over you, like me.
Uni
Uni wrote -
| QUOTE |
| rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Fair point. However, given my posting history in supernews.general without ever hearing from the abuse dept., I doubt they are that thin skinned. ;) Any way you can prove that? I don't think so. :-) Yep. All it would take is $3, and me posting in supernews.general using this e-mail addy. Now that I think about it, it wouldn't even take that. The SN admins post here. I give my permission to the SN admins to post here if I have been banned from posting from Supernews. I'm all in favor of them disciplining, for whatever reason blows their skirts up. However, when I'm singled out, it's time to take action. Dude, do you have ANY idea what I used to post in supernews.general? The SN abuse folks never even contacted me. The lack of substantiated abuse complaints likely was a factor. Like I said, I'm being singled out. Your posts may have been much worse than mine, but SN didn't have a bug up their behind over you, like me. |
Ohhhhh so sad. For the first time in years the turd is catching
tears in his tissues and not his wasted seed.
Oi Ratz - is there a Crocodile Tears Award ??
Aratzio wrote -
| QUOTE |
| FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK |
That's a bad stutter you've got there.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 05:39:21 +0100, Far Canal <[Email Removed]> got
double secret probation because:
double secret probation because:
| QUOTE |
| Uni wrote - rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Fair point. However, given my posting history in supernews.general without ever hearing from the abuse dept., I doubt they are that thin skinned. ;) Any way you can prove that? I don't think so. :-) Yep. All it would take is $3, and me posting in supernews.general using this e-mail addy. Now that I think about it, it wouldn't even take that. The SN admins post here. I give my permission to the SN admins to post here if I have been banned from posting from Supernews. I'm all in favor of them disciplining, for whatever reason blows their skirts up. However, when I'm singled out, it's time to take action. Dude, do you have ANY idea what I used to post in supernews.general? The SN abuse folks never even contacted me. The lack of substantiated abuse complaints likely was a factor. Like I said, I'm being singled out. Your posts may have been much worse than mine, but SN didn't have a bug up their behind over you, like me. |
A superior "They (TINT) all hate me and it is a conspiracy" whine. The
'Tard is correct, everyone does hate him and we laugh AT him all the
time.
| QUOTE |
Ohhhhh so sad. For the first time in years the turd is catching tears in his tissues and not his wasted seed. Oi Ratz - is there a Crocodile Tears Award ?? |
BUSTED URINAL AWARD
The reward for the Lamest of the Lame on the Internet. One who clogs
and stinks up the joint like abusted urinal, you could say.
TAR & FEATHERS
Reserved solely for the Terminally Clueless on the net, those most
highly incorrigible past all hope crusaders who in another time and
reality would've been tarred and feathered and ridden out of town
on a rail. Preferably one with a bridge out. Over a canyon.
GEORGE ARMSTRONG CUSTER "KICKED @$$" AWARD
Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up a lost
lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the enemy has won, set up
their own superpower in their midst and are chugging Guinness
in a Kook-free world scenario.
GEORGE PICKETT MEMORIAL TROPHY
For that which does the greatest impression of Pickett's Charge in any
given month.
Darth Bawl
Usenet's Biggest Crybaby. This is one of two public offices in AUK
that deserving candidates may run for.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I believe the Pickett is currently inactive and the Custer may
have just been brought out of retirement.
I am leaning towards Busted Urinal and/or Tar & Feathers. The Darth
Bawl may be a possible but the incumbent would be tough to unseat.
HTH
'Ratz
I will have to spend time with my RFN setup just so I can get all the
mids for the 'Tards whinefest when I nominate him for his next K00k
award.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 05:48:23 +0100, Far Canal <[Email Removed]> got
double secret probation because:
double secret probation because:
| QUOTE |
| Aratzio wrote - <FUCKING SNIP That's a bad stutter you've got there. So says the man stuck on carpet munching all day yesterday. |
"Aratzio" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]
news:[Email Removed]
| QUOTE |
| On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:17:13 -0400, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski" <[Email Removed]> got double secret probation because: "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Fair point. However, given my posting history in supernews.general without ever hearing from the abuse dept., I doubt they are that thin skinned. ;) Any way you can prove that? I don't think so. Sure they put up with your fuckwittery for years. |
Fuckwittery != Usenet abuse. ;)
| QUOTE |
| Dude, do you have ANY idea what I used to post in supernews.general? The SN abuse folks never even contacted me. The lack of substantiated abuse complaints likely was a factor. If I had a sn account I could post the following in sn.general. If the sn people had a problem and asked me to stop posting such messages I would. Really simple, their system, their rules and if you do not wish to abide by how they wish their system run, you are welcome to lose you posting privileges (PRIVILEDGES not RIGHT) or even have your account terminated. FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK |
Likely OK at SN. Just DON'T spam, unless you want Jeremy kicking your
ass. ;)
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic DXM, including dangers.
"If I swallow anything evil, put your finger down my throat."
-The Who, "Behind Blue Eyes"
"Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]
news:[Email Removed]
| QUOTE |
| rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Dude, do you have ANY idea what I used to post in supernews.general? The SN abuse folks never even contacted me. The lack of substantiated abuse complaints likely was a factor. Like I said, I'm being singled out. Your posts may have been much worse than mine, but SN didn't have a bug up their behind over you, like me. |
Free hint dude: figure out WHY SN didn't have a bug up their ass with me
so much they'd can me. That I didn't post anything that was abuse likely was
a factor.
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic DXM, including dangers.
"If I swallow anything evil, put your finger down my throat."
-The Who, "Behind Blue Eyes"
"Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]
news:[Email Removed]
| QUOTE |
| rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: I once actually got LARTed for using profanity in an internal newsgroup of an ISP that no longer exists. I'll just assume that SN has a clue and realizes that if any customer finds the word fuck objectionable, they really don't belong on Usenet. Robert, certainly Supernews objects to the use of profanity. |
Seriously? Which news admin there would blink an eye if I posted "fuck"
through their system?
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic DXM, including dangers.
"If I swallow anything evil, put your finger down my throat."
-The Who, "Behind Blue Eyes"
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:00:46 -0400, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"
<[Email Removed]> got double secret probation because:
<[Email Removed]> got double secret probation because:
| QUOTE |
| "Aratzio" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:17:13 -0400, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski" <[Email Removed]> got double secret probation because: "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Fair point. However, given my posting history in supernews.general without ever hearing from the abuse dept., I doubt they are that thin skinned. ;) Any way you can prove that? I don't think so. Sure they put up with your fuckwittery for years. Fuckwittery != Usenet abuse. ;) |
Who said abuse? You said thin skinned. The abuse desk probably gets
daily whines about the 'Tard and has to have a thick skin not to just
drop him for the annoyance factor. Again, SN needs no reason other
than they want to tell the 'Tard to pound sand up its ass and find a
new NSP.
| QUOTE |
<Another Big Fucking Snip Likely OK at SN. Just DON'T spam, unless you want Jeremy kicking your ass. ;) |
Like ArtistMike the Spammer did and lost his posting privileges?
'Ratz
--
A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz
Accept No Substitute
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:09:01 -0400, "rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski"
<[Email Removed]> got double secret probation because:
<[Email Removed]> got double secret probation because:
| QUOTE |
| "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: I once actually got LARTed for using profanity in an internal newsgroup of an ISP that no longer exists. I'll just assume that SN has a clue and realizes that if any customer finds the word fuck objectionable, they really don't belong on Usenet. Robert, certainly Supernews objects to the use of profanity. Seriously? Which news admin there would blink an eye if I posted "fuck" through their system? |
The fuckwit is lying as usual.
rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
| QUOTE |
| "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Dude, do you have ANY idea what I used to post in supernews.general? The SN abuse folks never even contacted me. The lack of substantiated abuse complaints likely was a factor. Like I said, I'm being singled out. Your posts may have been much worse than mine, but SN didn't have a bug up their behind over you, like me. Free hint dude: figure out WHY SN didn't have a bug up their ass with me so much they'd can me. That I didn't post anything that was abuse likely was a factor. |
It's ONLY abuse when EVERY OTHER NSP agrees it is. No other NSP objects
to editing, except Supernews. And, they wouldn't penalize any other
subscriber for it, except me.
Uni
rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
| QUOTE |
| "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: I once actually got LARTed for using profanity in an internal newsgroup of an ISP that no longer exists. I'll just assume that SN has a clue and realizes that if any customer finds the word fuck objectionable, they really don't belong on Usenet. Robert, certainly Supernews objects to the use of profanity. Seriously? Which news admin there would blink an eye if I posted "fuck" through their system? |
Show me one SN admin' that does use profanity.
Enough said.
Uni
Uni wrote -
| QUOTE |
| It's ONLY abuse when EVERY OTHER NSP agrees it is. No other NSP objects to editing, except Supernews. And, they wouldn't penalize any other subscriber for it, except me. |
The turd always wanted to special. Now it's received the special
honour of being selected as an example, it's dribbling piss down it's
legs.
Mummy Turd, come take your fucking cry baby away.
It needs a clean nappy (diaper for you merkins)
crybaby turd wrote -
| QUOTE |
| Did Supernews ever follow you from supernews.general, to another newsgroup, to defend their disciplinary actions? They did with me. Supernews Danhiel seems to feel that deleting (by snipping) what other people write is not harmful, at all: "Deliberately changing what someone wrote and quoting it in a manner that it is either directly attributed to them or left open to leave the impression it was written by that person sure seems to be walking the line of defamation depending on what you said and whether it caused that person emotional distress or could harm their reputation." |
Let's be positive. All the time the turd's whinging here - it ain't
molesting any children.
Uni wrote:
| QUOTE |
| rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: "Uni" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed] rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote: Dude, do you have ANY idea what I used to post in supernews.general? The SN abuse folks never even contacted me. The lack of substantiated abuse complaints likely was a factor. Like I said, I'm being singled out. Your posts may have been much worse than mine, but SN didn't have a bug up their behind over you, like me. Free hint dude: figure out WHY SN didn't have a bug up their ass with me so much they'd can me. That I didn't post anything that was abuse likely was a factor. It's ONLY abuse when EVERY OTHER NSP agrees it is. No other NSP objects to editing, except Supernews. And, they wouldn't penalize any other subscriber for it, except me. Uni |
Did Supernews ever follow you from supernews.general, to another
newsgroup, to defend their disciplinary actions? They did with me.
Supernews Danhiel seems to feel that deleting (by snipping) what other
people write is not harmful, at all:
"Deliberately changing what someone wrote and quoting it in a manner that
it is either directly attributed to them or left open to leave the
impression it was written by that person sure seems to be walking the
line of defamation depending on what you said and whether it caused that
person emotional distress or could harm their reputation."
Uni
Far Canal wrote:
| QUOTE |
| crybaby turd wrote - Did Supernews ever follow you from supernews.general, to another newsgroup, to defend their disciplinary actions? They did with me. Supernews Danhiel seems to feel that deleting (by snipping) what other people write is not harmful, at all: "Deliberately changing what someone wrote and quoting it in a manner that it is either directly attributed to them or left open to leave the impression it was written by that person sure seems to be walking the line of defamation depending on what you said and whether it caused that person emotional distress or could harm their reputation." Let's be positive. All the time the turd's whinging here - it ain't molesting any children. |
*YAWN*
:-)
Uni obsession will take you places.
:-)
Uni
Aratzio wrote:
| QUOTE |
| On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:39:15 -0400, Uni <[Email Removed] got double secret probation because: Uni wrote: Uni wrote: Jeremy Nixon - Supernews wrote: jbc <[Email Removed]> wrote: So, in all, there are three parties exerting their needs in different ways: you, Uni and Supernews. You want a newsprovider to be straight to others where you are not (as shown above with selective quoting and taking things out of context), Uni wants to post-edit and defamate people, the provider joins in with power play. There is no "power play". As should be obvious, we do not have the power to stop Uni from doing what he is doing. We do, however, have both the power and the right to decide that enough is enough when it comes to letting him do it from our system, because allowing him to continue reflects badly upon us. Your goal is to stop me and only me. No one complained about any text editing. You fabricated a reason. Let's see, years of complaints about you and your post editting. You are a liar 'Tard Joske, I was in supernews.general (private group) when this all happened. I made one tiny edit, it was humorous, not malicious and no "damage" was done. Let us cover this again: YEARS of lame ass post edits fuckwit not just one. Which makes you a lying fuckwit again. Supernews.general is not archived at Google. Paul Davis, at Supernews, was part of the set-up. So they entrapped you and made you post edit for years. It was a conspiracy. What an intriguing fantasy you have created, but fantasy just the same. He said Supernew's abuse head, Danhiel Baker, would contact me if I didn't stop. I didn't make any other changes. I challenged Paul and said, don't talk about it, do it. A day later, Danhiel sent me a warning via e-mail. One that has you scared and shaking in your little ballerina slippers you coward. (April Coward of the Month) Furthermore, Andrew at Supernews mentioned his "boss", Ade, didn't appreciate people replying to me in supernews.gerneral, because of noise, I guess. About a week ago, this was posted in supernews.general: Totally irrelevent fuckwit, this is about YEARS you have been post editting peoples words and now you have to pay the piper. You are officially a Usenet Abuser just like your Spammer buddy ArtistMike. <SNIP Strawman Fuckwittery Uni I wish I could nominate this fuckwit for the Clueless Newbie of the Month again but he is the reigning CNotM and cannot be nominated again. Maybe he just needs a Busted Urinal Nomination? 'Ratz -- A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz Accept No Substitute |
*YAWN*
:-)
The fake Aratzio strikes again.
:-)
Uni
Aratzio, you know who I am. But you don't...know why...I'm here.
| QUOTE |
| I wish I could nominate this fuckwit for the Clueless Newbie of the Month again but he is the reigning CNotM and cannot be nominated again. Maybe he just needs a Busted Urinal Nomination? 'Ratz |
What lUni needs is a little organic depeering. Wire cutters should work.
[ABNSC snipped in deference to supernews crossposting rules]
--
John Henry
www.lowgenius.com
Percussus Ergo Sum
Remove the SPAMBLOCK and organize an orgy to reply by e-mail
in article b2fic01m73svs2atj8439ktj4mkt2fit28@farfoos, Onideus Mad Hatter at
[Email Removed] wrote on 06/10/2004 10:02 PM:
[Email Removed] wrote on 06/10/2004 10:02 PM:
| QUOTE |
| On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 20:44:44 -0700, MartinS <[Email Removed]> wrote: in article [Email Removed], Aratzio at [Email Removed] wrote on 06/10/2004 7:47 PM: Stop Bob, you're killing me here!!!!!! LMGDFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You don't get out much do you... that pic has been around for a loooong time. Apparently if you're like a retard and just randomly stumbled into AUK within the past 3 months it's "new to you". You'll have to forgive the boi, probably he just graduated from braces to pimples and got a new Dell peecee this last Keeristmas. |
The "Ratboi" is a poor unfortunate child. Such a shame to see a misspent
youth, playing pocket pool while he types with one finger, slipping and
sliding from one key to the next because of the mess on his keyboard.
Ranting and raving about his fixation, with "Uni" and how terrible he is.
This child's parents are drunk on the floor in the livingroom while dogs
urinate on them. He attempts to hid from his horror of a life by playing
the big man in newsgroups.
The poor thing.
hahahahaha.
in article [Email Removed], Far Canal at
[Email Removed] wrote on 06/10/2004 10:36 PM:
[Email Removed] wrote on 06/10/2004 10:36 PM:
| QUOTE |
| it's dribbling piss down it's legs. |
Is that a problem for you?
rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski <[Email Removed]> wrote:
| QUOTE |
| Yep. All it would take is $3, and me posting in supernews.general using this e-mail addy. Now that I think about it, it wouldn't even take that. The SN admins post here. I give my permission to the SN admins to post here if I have been banned from posting from Supernews. |
Nah, feel free to come on over.
--
Jeremy | [Email Removed]
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.