"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in
news:BC9ECF6F.F325B%[Email Removed]:
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Jeremy Nixon - Supernews at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 10:15 AM: dave <[Email Removed]> wrote: Supernews posted messages that were FAKED AFTER HE WAS BLOCKED. They attempt to use messages that Mike could NOT have written as evidence of his "crime". If you look at the posts, you'll notice that they were deliberately constructed to bypass the block. Not by me. |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Demetrius Zeluff at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 11:00 AM: Seth <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:[Email Removed]: [snip] But from what little I have bothered to read about this, this is about him putting his URL in a post. Its a bit more than that. He put his URL into a sig, and then posted as often as he could just to get his url onto Usenet. Combine that with the fact that he's a trolling nymshifting twat, and some people are going to want to net cop him. Too bad for Supernews that they don't have the "policy" to disregard such silly "net copping". Instead they censor people based upon forged messages, and then attempt to hide that fact when confronted. |
QUOTE |
In the process you have just made Supernews look better and you look like a froggy k00k. |
QUOTE |
AlwaysCorrect <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9F594C.F33CD%[Email Removed]: in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 7:39 PM: Not a single Supernews customer MAY post Artist Mike's URL. What, are we now ALL spammers? Evidence, attached. Note that it states "spammed", not harassed, not upset, not abused, not nickname changing, but "spammed". :-) Uni http://www.artistmike.com The only reason I can do it, is because they don't have a strangle hold on me. Mike you are a pathetic spammer |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Seth at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 2:11 PM: So why he thinks this is good for the image of his business and bad for the image of Supernews, is beyond me. ArtistMike.com is not in the business of running a news host. So his opinion about Supernews and his own Graphic business are not related. But of course some silly person like you would think that there were. |
QUOTE |
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9F5A81.F33CE%[Email Removed]: in article [Email Removed], Jeremy Nixon - Supernews at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 7:42 PM: Jackie <[Email Removed]> wrote: Got any evidence that "MIke" is doing the spamming? Or is it just silly people using his email address? It's a vast conspiracy against you, is it? No, it is just silly people like you, that don't like my attitude and use my email as a return address when they do spam. You know damn well that people do that. Like have accounts all over the nation so that I can post from different parts of the US. Real smart Jeremy. Well, I can certainly see how you'd end up with enemies, I'll grant you that much. Supernews being another dupe or another enemy? Enemies? How can something as pathetic as ArtistMike ever find enemies? All he has are his lame AND pathetic sockpuppets along with Uni queen of the pathetic to support him. |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Jeremy Nixon - Supernews at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 4:33 PM: Well, "stupid and annoying" doesn't make a good argument for it being spam... But you use such ideas to make your personal "policy" which in turn colors your Official Supernews "policy". I've no idea. Had he complained in a reasonable and mature manner, the whole thing would have gone very differently. Blah Blah Blah "Kiss our ass and kiss our ass, and kiss our ass..." Spam and get filtered by SuperNews!!!!! |
QUOTE |
What a fucking hypocrite. |
QUOTE |
What a PATHETIC loser!!!!!!!!!! |
QUOTE |
The proof is out there, you just cannot take the truth. |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Rebecca Ore at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 8:25 PM: "Lord Pander" <[Email Removed]> writes: You mean this url? http://mysite.verizon.net/rebecca.ore Are you then a SPAMMER? I think so. LP I'm *not* suggesting that the answer to everyone's problems can be found by paying me for it, and I'm not posting the url as an answer to questions asked here. The reason you posted the url is irrelevant. You posted it, it's spam. Knock it off. hahahahaha. |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 7:39 PM: Not a single Supernews customer MAY post Artist Mike's URL. What, are we now ALL spammers? Evidence, attached. Note that it states "spammed", not harassed, not upset, not abused, not nickname changing, but "spammed". :-) Uni |
QUOTE |
http://www.artistmike.com The only reason I can do it, is because they don't have a strangle hold on me. |
QUOTE |
in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 6:29 AM: "Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9F5A81.F33CE%[Email Removed]: in article [Email Removed], Jeremy Nixon - Supernews at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 7:42 PM: Jackie <[Email Removed]> wrote: Got any evidence that "MIke" is doing the spamming? Or is it just silly people using his email address? It's a vast conspiracy against you, is it? No, it is just silly people like you, that don't like my attitude and use my email as a return address when they do spam. You know damn well that people do that. Like have accounts all over the nation so that I can post from different parts of the US. Real smart Jeremy. Well, I can certainly see how you'd end up with enemies, I'll grant you that much. Supernews being another dupe or another enemy? Enemies? How can something as pathetic as ArtistMike ever find enemies? All he has are his lame AND pathetic sockpuppets along with Uni queen of the pathetic to support him. Whine to Jeremy at Supernews... he brought up the word, not me. ":^) |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Demetrius Zeluff at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 2:46 AM: Maybe your constant nym-shifting had something to do with it? You poor baby... are you getting confused? hahaha. |
QUOTE |
in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 6:31 AM: What a fucking hypocrite. What I choose to not worry about, bothers you for some reason? Shrug. Do you have so little happening in your own life that you have to worry about mine also? You are very silly. |
QUOTE |
So if I read that correct everyone should do business with ARTISTMIKE? |
QUOTE |
in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 6:26 AM: AlwaysCorrect <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9F594C.F33CD%[Email Removed]: in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 7:39 PM: Not a single Supernews customer MAY post Artist Mike's URL. What, are we now ALL spammers? Evidence, attached. Note that it states "spammed", not harassed, not upset, not abused, not nickname changing, but "spammed". :-) Uni http://www.artistmike.com The only reason I can do it, is because they don't have a strangle hold on me. Mike you are a pathetic spammer Is there some reason I should care what you think? |
QUOTE |
I applaud Supernews for filtering ArtistMike. |
QUOTE |
Oh I refute your future refutation!!!!!!1!!!!! |
QUOTE |
in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 6:44 AM: What a PATHETIC loser!!!!!!!!!! I am amused by your pain. |
QUOTE |
Of course, one could marvel at the number of messages a single spammer has generated in this newsgroup since he began his tirade, and why people continue to reply after the 4th time he's spouted the exact same nonsense in reply to reasonable explanations of why he's being filtered. He has no credibility and I doubt anyone considering Supernews has been dissuaded from subscribing. |
QUOTE |
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9FEB09.F34ED%[Email Removed]: in article [Email Removed], Demetrius Zeluff at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 2:46 AM: Maybe your constant nym-shifting had something to do with it? You poor baby... are you getting confused? hahaha. Do you deny nym shifting? |
QUOTE |
in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 6:46 AM: The proof is out there, you just cannot take the truth. You are going to have to work on that Jack Nicolson impression. hahahaha. |
QUOTE |
in article 40798d3e$0$85210$[Email Removed], Willem at gaatjenietaan@notvalid@ac wrote on 04/11/2004 11:23 AM: What Mike wants is not my issue. My issue is if Supernews blocks customers on false evidence or personal matters with staff. Now that you have called ME a liar twice too, it seems easy to believe blocking will be done if Supernews staff dislikes what their customers write. This is the issue at hand... they have chosen to NOT keep their activities private. They have chosen to take little ArtistMike on in a newsgroup and now their "policies" are up for public debate. They have chosen to write and actually show those policies in action, in a public forum. Now the door is open ... they can't unring the bell. ":^) Supernews has written that they make policy upon personal opinions about clients. Supernews "does not care" about "ArtistMike" at this point because he dares to take his issue to the public in a public forum. How dare he do that! If only he would have kissed their ass and behaved like a good little user. But no... he has to go and have an opinion that does not match up with their opinions about spam, about the amount of messages that one person can post, his opinions don't match theirs and he has the balls to post his opinions in newsgroups ... PUBLIC NEWSGROUPS! How dare he do that? There is absolutely no point in addressing anything he says. Maybe the addressing is done the wrong way. The more I read about all this, the more I think the only way of addressing this is to lift the block. They can't do that. They can't. They have to "save face"... they can't be seen as backing down to a nobody like "ArtistMike". They are stuck. They have no place to go. They can either battle it out in the newsgroups and attempt to "win"... or they can keep their "policy" to themselves and slink back under the rock they were under. |
QUOTE |
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9FEE76.F350E% [Email Removed]: in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 6:44 AM: What a PATHETIC loser!!!!!!!!!! I am amused by your pain. I am amused... |
QUOTE |
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9FEC39.F3501% [Email Removed]: in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 6:26 AM: AlwaysCorrect <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9F594C.F33CD%[Email Removed]: in article [Email Removed], Uni at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 7:39 PM: Not a single Supernews customer MAY post Artist Mike's URL. What, are we now ALL spammers? Evidence, attached. Note that it states "spammed", not harassed, not upset, not abused, not nickname changing, but "spammed". :-) Uni http://www.artistmike.com The only reason I can do it, is because they don't have a strangle hold on me. Mike you are a pathetic spammer Is there some reason I should care what you think? Nope. |
QUOTE |
I applaud Supernews in doing a fine job of ridding the usenet of scum like you. |
QUOTE |
Plus it fun to make you jump up and down... |
QUOTE |
Jeremy Nixon - Supernews <[Email Removed]> wrote news:[Email Removed] Willem <gaatjenietaan@notvalid@ac> wrote: You keep denying you actually said they are by him but also you keep suggesting it. If you don't have proof or don't want to present proof, you have no reason to keep bringing them up in relation to Mike and the reason you blocked him. If you're just going to keep on misrepresenting the things I say so you'll have something to attack (cf. "straw man argument") then I see little point in carrying on this conversation. So I'll try saying the same thing yet again: those posts were *not* the reason he was blocked, and at no point did I ever claim that they were. If you can't understand that after my having said it over and over, then, whatever, carry on. Mike wrote he hadn't been spamming, your reply to him was to quote fake spam messages that "speak for themselves" and "are not forged". |
QUOTE |
Of course Supernews is free to call me a liar or an attacker for asking why you quoted the fake messages in relation to Mike. WJ |
QUOTE |
Lord Pander <[Email Removed]> wrote news:[Email Removed] "Rebecca Ore" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed]... If you were being filtered, you could have discussed it with Supernews and your ISP. If you were being forged, you could file abuse reports with the forgers' ISP. Did this as did many others and he got kicked from his ISP. But still being filtered by supernews. Exactly, this is what I read about Supernews too. That's how I found my way here. But in this newsgroup where the Supernews staff hangs out with trolls and flamers you get called a liar and a moron in no time when you ask about it. That makes me believe it has to be true. Not just about Mike and you. WJ So you support a nym shifting, frogging, lying spammer and not a |
QUOTE |
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9FEF16.F350F% [Email Removed]: in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 6:46 AM: The proof is out there, you just cannot take the truth. You are going to have to work on that Jack Nicolson impression. hahahaha. You avoid... |
QUOTE |
So Mike you claim that Supernews filters you based upon forgeries. Yet the forgeries came after your being filtered. So how do you reconcile those to facts? |
QUOTE |
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:<BC9EF3CF.F329E%[Email Removed]>... in article 40798d3e$0$85210$[Email Removed], Willem at gaatjenietaan@notvalid@ac wrote on 04/11/2004 11:23 AM: What Mike wants is not my issue. My issue is if Supernews blocks customers on false evidence or personal matters with staff. Now that you have called ME a liar twice too, it seems easy to believe blocking will be done if Supernews staff dislikes what their customers write. This is the issue at hand... they have chosen to NOT keep their activities private. They have chosen to take little ArtistMike on in a newsgroup and now their "policies" are up for public debate. They have chosen to write and actually show those policies in action, in a public forum. Now the door is open ... they can't unring the bell. ":^) Supernews has written that they make policy upon personal opinions about clients. Supernews "does not care" about "ArtistMike" at this point because he dares to take his issue to the public in a public forum. How dare he do that! If only he would have kissed their ass and behaved like a good little user. But no... he has to go and have an opinion that does not match up with their opinions about spam, about the amount of messages that one person can post, his opinions don't match theirs and he has the balls to post his opinions in newsgroups ... PUBLIC NEWSGROUPS! How dare he do that? There is absolutely no point in addressing anything he says. Maybe the addressing is done the wrong way. The more I read about all this, the more I think the only way of addressing this is to lift the block. They can't do that. They can't. They have to "save face"... they can't be seen as backing down to a nobody like "ArtistMike". They are stuck. They have no place to go. They can either battle it out in the newsgroups and attempt to "win"... or they can keep their "policy" to themselves and slink back under the rock they were under. There is no face to save. Supernews have done the right thing... |
QUOTE |
Nyms used by ArtistMike the spammer in support of his right to Spam: Mike.. AlwaysCorrect Dave Carol J Lord Pander Jackie Cris Zalika Combaticus |
QUOTE |
yep. online psychiaty is a growth industy <g |
QUOTE |
B U S T E D Ahahaha "Combaticus" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:BC9CA750.F26A3%[Email Removed]... It makes no difference if you believe me or not. The fact that Supernews censors people based upon fake messages is a fact. That fact will spread and some people will not want to deal with such a business. If there becomes a time that one person decides not to use Supernews because they censors people based upon forged messages, then I have gotten what I desired. |
QUOTE |
MartinS <[Email Removed]> writes: Carol J <biteme@kissmya**.com> wrote: Rebecca Ore: Give you one guess as to who is more credible -- you or anyone at Supernews. Evidence is what is credible, and they have not presented any. So go piss up a rope. Can girls do that? I think Spammer Mike misses many points. |
QUOTE |
I'm writing you. "Aratzio" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:BC9C935B.F265B%[Email Removed]... in article [Email Removed], Tuguns at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/09/2004 5:35 PM: Good now move on Ass. You writing to your own ass again? |
QUOTE |
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9FF156.F3557%[Email Removed]: in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 6:38 AM: So if I read that correct everyone should do business with ARTISTMIKE.COM? Yep. ":^) Glad you agree that ArtistMike.com is a great site and owned by a great artist. |
QUOTE |
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9FF1E8.F3566%[Email Removed]: in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 6:50 AM: I applaud Supernews for filtering ArtistMike. I see no reason to care what you think. You got one reason I should care what you think? hahahaha. Nope. |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Good Point at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 7:21 AM: "Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:<BC9EF3CF.F329E%[Email Removed]>... in article 40798d3e$0$85210$[Email Removed], Willem at gaatjenietaan@notvalid@ac wrote on 04/11/2004 11:23 AM: What Mike wants is not my issue. My issue is if Supernews blocks customers on false evidence or personal matters with staff. Now that you have called ME a liar twice too, it seems easy to believe blocking will be done if Supernews staff dislikes what their customers write. This is the issue at hand... they have chosen to NOT keep their activities private. They have chosen to take little ArtistMike on in a newsgroup and now their "policies" are up for public debate. They have chosen to write and actually show those policies in action, in a public forum. Now the door is open ... they can't unring the bell. ":^) Supernews has written that they make policy upon personal opinions about clients. Supernews "does not care" about "ArtistMike" at this point because he dares to take his issue to the public in a public forum. How dare he do that! If only he would have kissed their ass and behaved like a good little user. But no... he has to go and have an opinion that does not match up with their opinions about spam, about the amount of messages that one person can post, his opinions don't match theirs and he has the balls to post his opinions in newsgroups ... PUBLIC NEWSGROUPS! How dare he do that? There is absolutely no point in addressing anything he says. Maybe the addressing is done the wrong way. The more I read about all this, the more I think the only way of addressing this is to lift the block. They can't do that. They can't. They have to "save face"... they can't be seen as backing down to a nobody like "ArtistMike". They are stuck. They have no place to go. They can either battle it out in the newsgroups and attempt to "win"... or they can keep their "policy" to themselves and slink back under the rock they were under. There is no face to save. Supernews have done the right thing... Thank you for sharing your opinion. Now move on. ":^) |
QUOTE |
And you spin and spin like the little "net toy" you are. Spin for me little toy. |
QUOTE |
in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 4:30 AM: Nyms used by ArtistMike the spammer in support of his right to Spam: Mike.. AlwaysCorrect Dave Carol J Lord Pander Jackie Cris Zalika Combaticus I do enjoy you |
QUOTE |
You spin any faster "net Toy" you will fly. |
QUOTE |
Having a spammer like ArtistMike frog me is probably the most 3rd or 4th lamest thing he has done. The post edits are probably the lamest and the massive amount of sock puppets he requires to carry on 3rd person discussions about himself would be 2nd. Using the 'Tard as a supporter and frogging me is a toss-up for lameness. Lying and context snips are a distant 5th & 6th lamest things our Spammer has done. |
QUOTE |
Is there some reason I should care what you think? Nope. Good, then you are dismissed. ":^) I understand how frustrated you are, but spammers like you get what they deserve. Filtered by supernews. |
QUOTE |
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9FF581.F3576% [Email Removed]: in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 7:06 AM: I applaud Supernews in doing a fine job of ridding the usenet of scum like you. Little news for you... I am still on Usenet. hahaha. BWAHAHAHAHA and still filtered by Supernews ... |
QUOTE |
"Mike..." <[Email Removed]> wrote in news:BC9FF5D0.F3577% [Email Removed]: in article [email protected], Poik at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/12/2004 7:09 AM: Plus it fun to make you jump up and down... Your fantasies are amusing, but not very realistic. ":^) And your spinning like a top makes you my Net Toy |
QUOTE |
You don't think that I can agree with "Mike" that Supernews needs to be exposed? You are confused again. As usual. ":^) |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Rebecca Ore at [Email Removed] wrote on 04/11/2004 11:24 AM: MartinS <[Email Removed]> writes: Carol J <biteme@kissmya**.com> wrote: Rebecca Ore: Give you one guess as to who is more credible -- you or anyone at Supernews. Evidence is what is credible, and they have not presented any. So go piss up a rope. Can girls do that? I think Spammer Mike misses many points. Rebecca you have one point too many... |
QUOTE |
Do you really think that writing to your own ass will work? Will it answer you? Do you two often write to each other? hahaha. |