Help - Search - Member List - Calendar
Full Version: for Fred Doyle
WorkTheWeb Forums > Webmaster Resources > General Graphics Design Help
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57
Support our Sponsors!
TheUnknownOne
"Locutus" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
QUOTE



Faith doesn't need proof.

yes it does



Delusions too like faith do not need proof. So what's your point.
I should have faith? Faith about what? And why should I have faith in
the first place? For what purpose should I have faith in something?
Your asking us to give up our capacity to reason and just accept things
on the basis of some mysterious feeling. So we should
disregard all decisions we make on the basis of logical or empirical reasons
and simply believe and trust something to be the case on the basis of
what someone else says or how we feel. How long do you think we would
survive doing that?

TheUnknownOne
"Brian" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
QUOTE
Locutus wrote:
Faith doesn't need proof.


yes it does


If man could "prove" or "explain" God and everything he has done, God
wouldn't be worth worshipping. It's too much for us to even understand.

So in that case why don't you believe in the Devil?
Since we can't explain or prove the Devil either.

Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube
In article <uGNfe.28625$[Email Removed]>,
Ben Measures <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
You claim fundies persecute gays for their views, and yet you persecute
fundies for their views. You deserve exactly what you give.

Not at all, because I would never presume to deny fundies employment or
other basic societal considerations based on their religious views. If
they can do their job and keep their religion to themselves, not a
problem. Fundies problem is they can't just shut the fuck up about their
religion, they have to "witness."

But if they come to my door at 730 in the morning, it doesn't mean I
have to let them in.

Brian
TheUnknownOne wrote:
QUOTE
"Brian" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...

Locutus wrote:

Faith doesn't need proof.


yes it does



If man could "prove" or "explain" God and everything he has done, God
wouldn't be worth worshipping. It's too much for us to even understand.


So in that case why don't you believe in the Devil?
Since we can't explain or prove the Devil either.


I DO believe there is a Devil.


BTR1701
In article <[Email Removed]>,
Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <[Email Removed]>,
SpaceGirl <[Email Removed]> wrote:

Transition Zone wrote:

[Email Removed] wrote:

"For if you confess with your mouth Jesus is Lord
and believe in your heart that God raised Him from
the dead, you WILL BE SAVED." (Romans 10:9)

Prove (with facts) that Jesus is the Son of God.

Faith doesn't need proof.

It does when you want to influence others with your religion. [Banning
evolution from school textbooks, for example.]

From http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Faith

faith: Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.
See Synonyms at belief. See Synonyms at trust.

The point is that you're welcome to believe anything you like but if you
want to pass laws and tell me and my kids what they can and can't learn
in a public school, then you have to back it up with more than "because
god says so".

BTR1701
In article <[Email Removed]>,
Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote:
In article <[Email Removed]>,
Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote:


faith: Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.
See Synonyms at belief. See Synonyms at trust.


Well, I believe in Santa. And he's every bit as real as your doG.

I was just pointing out that "faith" does not need "proof" by definition.
By the way, if you live in a house do you have "proof" there was a
designer, contractor or workers, even though you didn't see them build
it? You would probably say "Of course, look here is my house. That is
proof enough." Wouldn't the same hold true for God?

No.

BTR1701
In article <grMfe.28573$[Email Removed]>,
Ben Measures <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote:

Now, when your doG shows up, shakes hands, hands me a beer and says
"Hey, y'all want the tour?" I might have reason to believe.

Why would somebody you choose to ignore want to talk to you? If you
really want to talk to God, you need to get up and look for Him.

But then she
wouldn't be an invisible friend any more, would she?

Bingo. That's faith: the personal evidence of things not seen.

And then you guys inflict the rules, regulations and strictures of those
unseen and and unproved "things" on the rest of us and when we ask why,
you make some vague reference to faith in your invisible sky-tyrant.

Sorry, not good enough. Believe what you want but the moment a believer
expects me to fall in line, they better bring the proof first.

BTR1701
In article <[Email Removed]>,
Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote:
In article <[Email Removed]>,
Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote:


I was just pointing out that "faith" does not need "proof" by definition.
By the way, if you live in a house do you have "proof" there was a
designer, contractor or workers, even though you didn't see them build
it? You would probably say "Of course, look here is my house. That is
proof enough." Wouldn't the same hold true for God?


No, because I know by experience in life that houses don't erect
themselves. It's quantifiable and provable. It's rational and requires
no leap of faith. Housing is a construct of humans, not any invisible
friend because if it wasn't, we'd all still be sleeping outside.

Now, when your doG shows up, shakes hands, hands me a beer and says
"Hey, y'all want the tour?" I might have reason to believe. But then she
wouldn't be an invisible friend any more, would she?

So how do you think that we came to exist? If subscribe to the "big
bang" theory, think about this; take a pocket watch smash it with a
hammer. Now put it in a bag and shake it. Did all of the millions of
pieces come together to create a working pocket watch?

Wow, you really have all the creationist metaphors memorized, don't ya?

Anyway, the answer to your "who created the universe" question is
obvious: Bastet... and she's mighty pissed off at you.

808
On Mon, 09 May 2005 18:38:06 -0400, BTR1701 <[Email Removed]>
wrote:

QUOTE
In article <[Email Removed]>,
Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote:

Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote:
In article <[Email Removed]>,
Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote:


I was just pointing out that "faith" does not need "proof" by definition.
By the way, if you live in a house do you have "proof" there was a
designer, contractor or workers, even though you didn't see them build
it? You would probably say "Of course, look here is my house. That is
proof enough." Wouldn't the same hold true for God?


No, because I know by experience in life that houses don't erect
themselves. It's quantifiable and provable. It's rational and requires
no leap of faith. Housing is a construct of humans, not any invisible
friend because if it wasn't, we'd all still be sleeping outside.

Now, when your doG shows up, shakes hands, hands me a beer and says
"Hey, y'all want the tour?" I might have reason to believe. But then she
wouldn't be an invisible friend any more, would she?

So how do you think that we came to exist? If subscribe to the "big
bang" theory, think about this; take a pocket watch smash it with a
hammer. Now put it in a bag and shake it. Did all of the millions of
pieces come together to create a working pocket watch?

Wow, you really have all the creationist metaphors memorized, don't ya?

Anyway, the answer to your "who created the universe" question is
obvious: Bastet... and she's mighty pissed off at you.

Bastet? That's my cat.

Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube
In article <[Email Removed]>,
808 <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
Bastet?  That's my cat.

Well if you worship your cat, you're on the level of the ancient
Egyptians, who were a damn sight smarter than modern-day Xians, who are
mostly as dumb as a box of rocks.

Lon Chaney (Man of 1000 Faces)
in article bkOfe.19397$[Email Removed], TheUnknownOne at
[Email Removed] wrote on 05/09/2005 11:52 AM:

QUOTE
is there such a thing as the "Word of God".


Produce evidence that there is a "God". Then you can go on to produce some
of it's words.

Lon Chaney (Man of 1000 Faces)
in article l%Ofe.19486$[Email Removed], Brian at
[Email Removed] wrote on 05/09/2005 12:38 PM:


QUOTE
I DO believe there is a Devil.

How do you know that your deity "Devil" is not the one you should be
worshiping?

Clell Harmon
Raymond wrote:

QUOTE
Archangel wrote:

Really there is no way scientifically to prove that Jesus is the son

of God.

What the Christian religon has is the books written two thousand or

so years

ago that make up the cannon of the Bible the old and new testament.

Even

Jesus's ressurection comes from a second hand account written by men.

Even

when the New Testament was being written it was begun to be written

decades

after the crucifixction.


The problem with this is that if it did not happen, the Church never
would have got started, as the people alive would have written that it
was a lie.  The fact is that in the location where it did happen, a
church was built and thousand came to Jesus by faith.  He lives and
they knew it as it was first hand on site being there, that made it
true, and undeniable fact.  The bible was not second hand, I don't see
any place such could be said about the bible.  The folks that were
there at the time were writing about it.  Their writings later were
made into the Bible.  It was fact at the time it happen.  The writings
were from the original hand written letters and statements.  Just like
the stories we have today in the NEWS Papers, the typist is only
copying what was given to them, by eye witness, and put into a form
thousands could read.  Now one calls it second hand stuff, as it was
first hand to start with.

Wow. Not only do you not know any history, you don't even know the
history of your own faith. Amazing.

>

Clell Harmon
SpaceGirl wrote:

QUOTE
Transition Zone wrote:

Prove (with facts) that Jesus is the Son of God.






[Email Removed] wrote:

"For if you confess with your mouth Jesus is Lord
and believe in your heart that God raised Him from
the dead, you WILL BE SAVED." (Romans 10:9)




Faith doesn't need proof.

Faith denies proof.

Clell Harmon
SpaceGirl wrote:

QUOTE
Locutus wrote:

Faith doesn't need proof.



yes it does



Look up the definition of faith. I have faith that the sky wont fall
tomorrow, but I can't prove it! :)

How can a sky fall?

QUOTE

*anyway*... I'm agnostic, and I dont actually have a lot of faith in
anything :)


Clell Harmon
Brian wrote:

QUOTE
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote:

In article <[Email Removed]>,
Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote:


I was just pointing out that "faith" does not need "proof" by
definition.
By the way, if you live in a house do you have "proof" there was a
designer, contractor or workers, even though you didn't see them
build it? You would probably say "Of course, look here is my house.
That is proof enough." Wouldn't the same hold true for God?



No, because I know by experience in life that houses don't erect
themselves. It's quantifiable and provable. It's rational and requires
no leap of faith. Housing is a construct of humans, not any invisible
friend because if it wasn't, we'd all still be sleeping outside.
Now, when your doG shows up, shakes hands, hands me a beer and says
"Hey, y'all want the tour?" I might have reason to believe. But then
she wouldn't be an invisible friend any more, would she?

So how do you think that we came to exist? If subscribe to the "big
bang" theory, think about this; take a pocket watch smash it with a
hammer. Now put it in a bag and shake it. Did all of the millions of
pieces come together to create a working pocket watch?

It's not our fault you're too lazy to shake it long enough.

Clell Harmon
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote:

QUOTE
In article <[Email Removed]>,
SpaceGirl <[Email Removed]> wrote:


so does morality, and the latter is a big part of
all religions.


The explain to me why:

Muslims fly aircraft into buildings and blow up thousands of people.

Their Mullah who has a personal connection to their invisible sky fairy
told them to so that they can get to heaven and get their virgin collection.

As a side note, why virgins? Wouldn't eternity with one dirty girl
from Fresno be more fun than all the virgins in the afterlife?
QUOTE

Fundies murder physicians who perform abortions.

Their Priest who has a personal connection to their invisible sky fairy
told them to so that they can get to heaven and get their Harm and wings.

Again, wouldn't the dirty girl from Fresno be a lot more fun?

QUOTE

Catholic priests rape altar boys.

Because they can't get laid publicly, and besides according to TZ some
of those alter boys are just ASKING for it...

QUOTE

You call that morality? You have an interesting definition of morality.

They pay a lot of LIP SERVICE to "morality," but when you get down to
where the bear shits in the buckwheat, they use their so-called morality
as a weapon, while not following their stated morality in their own
lives.

Hypocrisy, party of millions?


Clell Harmon
Brian wrote:

QUOTE
TheUnknownOne wrote:

"Brian" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...

Locutus wrote:

Faith doesn't need proof.



yes it does



If man could "prove" or "explain" God and everything he has done, God
wouldn't be worth worshipping. It's too much for us to even understand.



So in that case why don't you believe in the Devil?
Since we can't explain or prove the Devil either.

I DO believe there is a Devil.

Please, do you have to discuss your gods failures?

Ben Measures
BTR1701 wrote:
QUOTE

And then you guys inflict the rules, regulations and strictures [snip]

And I met you when? Tell me, dates and places of when I personally did
you grievance.

--
Ben M.

SpaceGirl
Clell Harmon wrote:

QUOTE
Faith doesn't need proof.


Faith denies proof.

That's one way of looking at it :)

John Fraser
Good morning Clell;

"Clell Harmon" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:B1Zfe.72082$WI3.21976@attbi_s71...
QUOTE


Brian wrote:

TheUnknownOne wrote:

"Brian" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...

Locutus wrote:

Faith doesn't need proof.



yes it does



If man could "prove" or "explain" God and everything he has done, God
wouldn't be worth worshipping. It's too much for us to even understand.



So in that case why don't you believe in the Devil?
Since we can't explain or prove the Devil either.

I DO believe there is a Devil.

Please, do you have to discuss your gods failures?

Please elaborate on failures.

Cheers,
John

Ben Measures
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote:
QUOTE
Ben Measures wrote:
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote:

Doing my best to be as offensive to fundies as possible. They deserve
it.

You claim fundies persecute gays for their views, and yet you persecute
fundies for their views. You deserve exactly what you give.

Not at all, because I would never presume to deny fundies employment

But you'd "do your best to be as offensive as possible" if they were
under your employment? Do you really think that's any better?

--
Ben M.

BTR1701
In article <040ge.29024$[Email Removed]>,
Ben Measures <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
BTR1701 wrote:

And then you guys inflict the rules, regulations and strictures [snip]

And I met you when? Tell me, dates and places of when I personally did
you grievance.

It's called the "general you". Familiarize yourself with the concept.

Ben Measures
BTR1701 wrote:
QUOTE

It's called the "general you". Familiarize yourself with the concept.

Only fools make generalisations based on race, colour or creed.

--
Ben M.

Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube
In article <Hf0ge.29036$[Email Removed]>,
Ben Measures <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
But you'd "do your best to be as offensive as possible" if they were
under your employment? Do you really think that's any better?

Don't be an ass, you ass.

If they were under my employment (I am not an employer) they'd talk
about work. I do my best to offend fundies ON USENET, you FUCKING MORON!

Ben Measures
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote:
QUOTE
Ben Measures <[Email Removed]> wrote:

But you'd "do your best to be as offensive as possible" if they were
under your employment? Do you really think that's any better?

Don't be an ass, you ass.

I'm only just quoting you. To see yourself from somebody else's
perspective is often very grounding.

--
Ben M.

Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube
In article <aV2ge.29148$[Email Removed]>,
Ben Measures <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
I'm only just quoting you. To see yourself from somebody else's
perspective is often very grounding.

You keep telling yourself while talking to you invisible friend.

I say again, religion is the bane of human existence.

808
On Tue, 10 May 2005 12:20:52 GMT, Ben Measures
<[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
BTR1701 wrote:

It's called the "general you". Familiarize yourself with the concept.

Only fools make generalisations based on race, colour or creed.

I would have thought a system of principles and beliefs that a group
of people subscribe to (i.e. a creed) would allow you to generalise
about them a little bit.

Ben Measures
808 wrote:
QUOTE
Ben Measures wrote:

Only fools make generalisations based on race, colour or creed.

I would have thought a system of principles and beliefs that a group
of people subscribe to (i.e. a creed) would allow you to generalise
about them a little bit.

A general statement is a very different thing to a generalised
statement. The first applies to every case of a category, the second
applies specific cases to every case of a category.

Where humans are concerned such generalised statements are never
correct, simply because each person in a group is unique except for
whatever critera makes up that group.

--
Ben M.

Bart
Archangel wrote:
QUOTE
What the Christian religon has is the books written two thousand or
so years
ago that make up the cannon of the Bible the old and new testament.

There's a cannon that is made of books from 2000 years ago? Does it
shoot paper cannonballs?

Dustin Macdonald
QUOTE
If there was
no real boogy-man then the stories would not have started, right?



There were actual "boogie men". The term comes from the spice trades
in what is now Indonesia. The name comes from the Bugis (pronounced
"boo" "geese") traders of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Very harsh pirates /
traders that made a significant impact in the dangerous nature of the
indonesian spice trades. There were many not-so-friendly encounters
with these traders during the regions Dutch occupation and spice trades
with the British, hence the passed down of lore of the "bugis man".

- Dustin

--
--

Macdonald Design, Inc.
ph:
Web: www.macdonalddesign.com

"Creative Solutions for Today's Evolving Marketplace"

Lon Chaney (Man of 1000 Faces)
in article 2005051010474416807%altdesigngraphics@macdonalddesigncom, Dustin
Macdonald at [Email Removed] wrote on 05/10/2005
10:47 AM:

QUOTE
If there was
no real boogy-man then the stories would not have started, right?



There were actual "boogie men".  The term comes from the spice trades
in what is now Indonesia.  The name comes from the Bugis (pronounced
"boo" "geese") traders of Sulawesi, Indonesia.  Very harsh pirates /
traders that made a significant impact in the dangerous nature of the
indonesian spice trades.  There were many not-so-friendly encounters
with these traders during the regions Dutch occupation and spice trades
with the British, hence the passed down of lore of the "bugis man".

- Dustin


Do they live in your closet or under your bed? Do they grab your feet as
you step into bed at night?

hahahaha.

Lon Chaney (Man of 1000 Faces)
in article 2005051010474416807%altdesigngraphics@macdonalddesigncom, Dustin
Macdonald at [Email Removed] wrote on 05/10/2005
10:47 AM:

QUOTE
If there was
no real boogy-man then the stories would not have started, right?



There were actual "boogie men".  The term comes from the spice trades
in what is now Indonesia.  The name comes from the Bugis (pronounced
"boo" "geese") traders of Sulawesi, Indonesia.  Very harsh pirates /
traders that made a significant impact in the dangerous nature of the
indonesian spice trades.  There were many not-so-friendly encounters
with these traders during the regions Dutch occupation and spice trades
with the British, hence the passed down of lore of the "bugis man".

- Dustin


Thus we have a story that may have a seed of truth but has been corrupted
over time until the story is totally false and a fantasy.

Does your "bugis man" live under your bed still?

":^)

BTR1701
In article <EG1ge.29084$[Email Removed]>,
Ben Measures <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
BTR1701 wrote:

It's called the "general you". Familiarize yourself with the concept.

Only fools make generalisations based on race, colour or creed.

That's an unsupported assertion.

Dustin Macdonald
On 2005-05-10 11:51:46 -0700, "Lon Chaney (Man of 1000 Faces)"
<[Email Removed]> said:

QUOTE
Do they live in your closet or under your bed?  Do they grab your feet as
you step into bed at night?

hahahaha.

Does your "bugis man" live under your bed still?

":^)

You try and educate some people just a little, and look what happens....

Very sad.

--
--

Macdonald Design, Inc.
ph:
Web: www.macdonalddesign.com

"Creative Solutions for Today's Evolving Marketplace"

Brian
Dustin Macdonald wrote:
QUOTE

On 2005-05-10 11:51:46 -0700, "Lon Chaney (Man of 1000 Faces)"
<[Email Removed]> said:

Do they live in your closet or under your bed?  Do they grab your feet as
you step into bed at night?

hahahaha.

Does your "bugis man" live under your bed still?

":^)


You try and educate some people just a little, and look what happens....

Very sad.

You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat...

geeeeesh.

Dustin Macdonald
QUOTE

You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat...
geeeeesh.

It's not? ;-)

--
--

Macdonald Design, Inc.
ph:
Web: www.macdonalddesign.com

"Creative Solutions for Today's Evolving Marketplace"

fugitive
in article [Email Removed], Brian at
[Email Removed] wrote on 05/11/2005 5:05 AM:


QUOTE
You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat...
geeeeesh.


You should have seen Brian when he found out that he does not control what
is posted in a newsgroup. He got all pissy and started spinning.

What a mess.

Brian
fugitive wrote:
QUOTE
in article [Email Removed], Brian at
[Email Removed] wrote on 05/11/2005 5:05 AM:



You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat...
geeeeesh.



You should have seen Brian when he found out that he does not control what
is posted in a newsgroup.  He got all pissy and started spinning.

What a mess.


Huh? Voicing opinions is now "controlling newsgroups"? Didn't know that,

thanks for the info.
...er wait... or were you just voicing an opinion?

fugitive
in article [Email Removed], Brian at
[Email Removed] wrote on 05/11/2005 11:41 AM:

QUOTE
fugitive wrote:
in article [Email Removed], Brian at
[Email Removed] wrote on 05/11/2005 5:05 AM:



You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat...
geeeeesh.



You should have seen Brian when he found out that he does not control what
is posted in a newsgroup.  He got all pissy and started spinning.

What a mess.


Huh? Voicing opinions is now "controlling newsgroups"? Didn't know that,
thanks for the info.


You were reminded of your limitations and you did not like it. Move on.

Clell Harmon
John Fraser wrote:
QUOTE
Good morning Clell;

"Clell Harmon" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:B1Zfe.72082$WI3.21976@attbi_s71...


Brian wrote:


TheUnknownOne wrote:


"Brian" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...


Locutus wrote:


Faith doesn't need proof.



yes it does



If man could "prove" or "explain" God and everything he has done, God
wouldn't be worth worshipping. It's too much for us to even understand.



So in that case why don't you believe in the Devil?
Since we can't explain or prove the Devil either.


I DO believe there is a Devil.

Please, do you have to discuss your gods failures?


Please elaborate on failures.

Satan, the best of his angels, purportedly led a revolt against him.

Good job there god...

Clell Harmon
SpaceGirl wrote:

QUOTE
Clell Harmon wrote:

Faith doesn't need proof.



Faith denies proof.


That's one way of looking at it :)

It's the only way to look at it. If mere evidence would change a
believers mind, they never REALLY believed in the first place.

SpaceGirl
Clell Harmon wrote:
QUOTE
SpaceGirl wrote:

That's one way of looking at it :)


It's the only way to look at it.  If mere evidence would change a
believers mind, they never REALLY believed in the first place.

I disagree. Faith does not REQUIRE proof, but can exist even if there IS
proof (in general terms).

BTR1701 wrote:
QUOTE
In article <[Email Removed]>,
"Raymond" <[Email Removed]> wrote:

The problem with this is that if it did not happen, the Church
never
would have got started, as the people alive would have written that
it
was a lie.  The fact is that in the location where it did happen, a
church was built and thousand came to Jesus by faith.

The same could be said of the Greek and Roman gods. (And every other
religion as well.)

I am sure anyone can say such, only in Christ Jesus; he rose from the
dead, and was seen by up to 500 people at one time. Sent days after
his resurrection to give all that would not believe time to see and
know God did raise him up from the dead. So a few days later Peter was
able to baptized 3,000 people. Then only the Greek Orthodox church can
say they still have the buildings and place where Jesus walked and
preached, which even the Greeks and Roman gods could never say or any
other religion, then I don't see why they would want to, as it would
show they lied and not to be trusted. Today about two Billion people
say they are Christian.

QUOTE

Are they all real, too?

As for religions goes they are real, only false and not of the Creator
God, that made mankind in the beginning. Lots of gods, and religions,
only one true God and Saviour and that is Jesus the Christ the Saviour
to all that accept His payment for sin, his blood on the cross, he gave
his life so others may live eternal, then rose from the dead to prove
he had the power to back up His promise.

Raymond
www.pioneers-for-jesus.org

Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube
In article <[Email Removed]>,
[Email Removed] wrote:

QUOTE
he rose from the
dead, and was seen by up to 500 people at one time.

Too bad I wasn't one of them. Who told you 500 people saw him? The tooth
fairy? What did Santa and the easter Bunnny have to say about that? Did
the Super-Friends tell you?

Can't anyone see how ridiculous you look when you talk about your faith
in your invisible friend in the sky?

Whiskey Man's my friend he's with me nearly all the time
He always joins me when I drink and we get on just fine
No one else has ever seen him
I'm the only one
Seemingly I must be mad
Insanity is fun...if that's the way it's done
(with thanks to John Entwistle)

Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube
In article <[Email Removed]>,
[Email Removed] wrote:

QUOTE
Today about two Billion people
say they are Christian.

It's a horrifying thing to realize that two-thirds of the planet's
population are so stupid and weak, that they need to believe in an
invisible fairy in the sky.

Furthermore, it's an equally horrifying thing that the leaders of this
mass insanity are mostly pedophiles.

Brian
fugitive wrote:
QUOTE
in article [Email Removed], Brian at
[Email Removed] wrote on 05/11/2005 11:41 AM:


fugitive wrote:

in article [Email Removed], Brian at
[Email Removed] wrote on 05/11/2005 5:05 AM:




You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat...
geeeeesh.



You should have seen Brian when he found out that he does not control what
is posted in a newsgroup.  He got all pissy and started spinning.

What a mess.



Huh? Voicing opinions is now "controlling newsgroups"? Didn't know that,
thanks for the info.



You were reminded of your limitations and you did not like it.  Move on.


???


Maarcos
"Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
QUOTE
In article <[Email Removed]>,
[Email Removed] wrote:

Today about two Billion people
say they are Christian.

It's a horrifying thing to realize that two-thirds of the planet's
population are so stupid and weak, that they need to believe in an
invisible fairy in the sky.

Furthermore, it's an equally horrifying thing that the leaders of
this
mass insanity are mostly pedophiles.

its unfortunate that some have so little understanding of how things
actually are as opposed to media hype and a self inflating ego that
makes one unreceptive ......can it be you are missing something?

Lady Chatterly
In article <[Email Removed]>
[Email Removed] wrote:
QUOTE

I am sure anyone can say such, only in Christ Jesus; he rose from the
dead, and was seen by up to 500 people at one time.  Sent days after
his resurrection to give all that would not believe time to see and
know God did raise him up from the dead.  So a few days later Peter was
able to baptized 3,000 people.  Then only the Greek Orthodox church can
say they still have the buildings and place where Jesus walked and
preached, which even the Greeks and Roman gods could never say or any
other religion, then I don't see why they would want to, as it would
show they lied and not to be trusted.  Today about two Billion people
say they are Christian.

He is a good thing, and I Will be able to read.

QUOTE
As for religions goes they are real, only false and not of the Creator
God, that made mankind in the beginning.  Lots of gods, and religions,
only one true God and Saviour and that is Jesus the Christ the Saviour
to all that accept His payment for sin, his blood on the cross, he gave
his life so others may live eternal, then rose from the dead to prove
he had the power to back up His promise.

Keep on fooling yourself that you are a fart.

--
Lady Chatterly

"Does anyone on this group know who this Lady Chatterly' is? Either
way, I hope for her sake that she finds something more meaningful to
do with her life than degrading people's posts on the usenet. I'm
sure such a past time can hardly be fulfilling. Maybe she should buy
a dog :D." -- hvatum

Davy Jones Locker
In article
<VVJge.747319$[Email Removed]>,
"Maarcos" <[Email Removed]> wrote:

QUOTE
its unfortunate that some have so little understanding of how things
actually are as opposed to media hype and a self inflating ego that
makes one unreceptive ......can it be you are missing something?

I haven't seen anything to miss.

Religion is the bane of human existence. It's the one form of slavery
that has not been outlawed in the US.
--
Steve Young better than Joe Montana?
Don't make me laugh


PHP Help | Linux Help | Web Hosting | Reseller Hosting | SSL Hosting
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2006 Invision Power Services, Inc.