"Locutus" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message
news:[Email Removed]...
QUOTE |
Faith doesn't need proof. yes it does |
QUOTE |
Locutus wrote: Faith doesn't need proof. yes it does If man could "prove" or "explain" God and everything he has done, God wouldn't be worth worshipping. It's too much for us to even understand. |
QUOTE |
You claim fundies persecute gays for their views, and yet you persecute fundies for their views. You deserve exactly what you give. |
QUOTE |
"Brian" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed]... Locutus wrote: Faith doesn't need proof. yes it does If man could "prove" or "explain" God and everything he has done, God wouldn't be worth worshipping. It's too much for us to even understand. So in that case why don't you believe in the Devil? Since we can't explain or prove the Devil either. I DO believe there is a Devil. |
QUOTE |
BTR1701 wrote: In article <[Email Removed]>, SpaceGirl <[Email Removed]> wrote: Transition Zone wrote: [Email Removed] wrote: "For if you confess with your mouth Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you WILL BE SAVED." (Romans 10:9) Prove (with facts) that Jesus is the Son of God. Faith doesn't need proof. It does when you want to influence others with your religion. [Banning evolution from school textbooks, for example.] From http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Faith faith: Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence. See Synonyms at belief. See Synonyms at trust. |
QUOTE |
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote: In article <[Email Removed]>, Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote: faith: Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence. See Synonyms at belief. See Synonyms at trust. Well, I believe in Santa. And he's every bit as real as your doG. I was just pointing out that "faith" does not need "proof" by definition. By the way, if you live in a house do you have "proof" there was a designer, contractor or workers, even though you didn't see them build it? You would probably say "Of course, look here is my house. That is proof enough." Wouldn't the same hold true for God? |
QUOTE |
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote: Now, when your doG shows up, shakes hands, hands me a beer and says "Hey, y'all want the tour?" I might have reason to believe. Why would somebody you choose to ignore want to talk to you? If you really want to talk to God, you need to get up and look for Him. But then she wouldn't be an invisible friend any more, would she? Bingo. That's faith: the personal evidence of things not seen. |
QUOTE |
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote: In article <[Email Removed]>, Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote: I was just pointing out that "faith" does not need "proof" by definition. By the way, if you live in a house do you have "proof" there was a designer, contractor or workers, even though you didn't see them build it? You would probably say "Of course, look here is my house. That is proof enough." Wouldn't the same hold true for God? No, because I know by experience in life that houses don't erect themselves. It's quantifiable and provable. It's rational and requires no leap of faith. Housing is a construct of humans, not any invisible friend because if it wasn't, we'd all still be sleeping outside. Now, when your doG shows up, shakes hands, hands me a beer and says "Hey, y'all want the tour?" I might have reason to believe. But then she wouldn't be an invisible friend any more, would she? So how do you think that we came to exist? If subscribe to the "big bang" theory, think about this; take a pocket watch smash it with a hammer. Now put it in a bag and shake it. Did all of the millions of pieces come together to create a working pocket watch? |
QUOTE |
In article <[Email Removed]>, Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote: Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote: In article <[Email Removed]>, Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote: I was just pointing out that "faith" does not need "proof" by definition. By the way, if you live in a house do you have "proof" there was a designer, contractor or workers, even though you didn't see them build it? You would probably say "Of course, look here is my house. That is proof enough." Wouldn't the same hold true for God? No, because I know by experience in life that houses don't erect themselves. It's quantifiable and provable. It's rational and requires no leap of faith. Housing is a construct of humans, not any invisible friend because if it wasn't, we'd all still be sleeping outside. Now, when your doG shows up, shakes hands, hands me a beer and says "Hey, y'all want the tour?" I might have reason to believe. But then she wouldn't be an invisible friend any more, would she? So how do you think that we came to exist? If subscribe to the "big bang" theory, think about this; take a pocket watch smash it with a hammer. Now put it in a bag and shake it. Did all of the millions of pieces come together to create a working pocket watch? Wow, you really have all the creationist metaphors memorized, don't ya? Anyway, the answer to your "who created the universe" question is obvious: Bastet... and she's mighty pissed off at you. |
QUOTE |
Bastet? That's my cat. |
QUOTE |
is there such a thing as the "Word of God". |
QUOTE |
I DO believe there is a Devil. |
QUOTE |
Archangel wrote: Really there is no way scientifically to prove that Jesus is the son of God. What the Christian religon has is the books written two thousand or so years ago that make up the cannon of the Bible the old and new testament. Even Jesus's ressurection comes from a second hand account written by men. Even when the New Testament was being written it was begun to be written decades after the crucifixction. The problem with this is that if it did not happen, the Church never would have got started, as the people alive would have written that it was a lie. The fact is that in the location where it did happen, a church was built and thousand came to Jesus by faith. He lives and they knew it as it was first hand on site being there, that made it true, and undeniable fact. The bible was not second hand, I don't see any place such could be said about the bible. The folks that were there at the time were writing about it. Their writings later were made into the Bible. It was fact at the time it happen. The writings were from the original hand written letters and statements. Just like the stories we have today in the NEWS Papers, the typist is only copying what was given to them, by eye witness, and put into a form thousands could read. Now one calls it second hand stuff, as it was first hand to start with. |
QUOTE |
Transition Zone wrote: Prove (with facts) that Jesus is the Son of God. [Email Removed] wrote: "For if you confess with your mouth Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you WILL BE SAVED." (Romans 10:9) Faith doesn't need proof. |
QUOTE |
Locutus wrote: Faith doesn't need proof. yes it does Look up the definition of faith. I have faith that the sky wont fall tomorrow, but I can't prove it! :) |
QUOTE |
*anyway*... I'm agnostic, and I dont actually have a lot of faith in anything :) |
QUOTE |
Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote: In article <[Email Removed]>, Brian <[Email Removed]> wrote: I was just pointing out that "faith" does not need "proof" by definition. By the way, if you live in a house do you have "proof" there was a designer, contractor or workers, even though you didn't see them build it? You would probably say "Of course, look here is my house. That is proof enough." Wouldn't the same hold true for God? No, because I know by experience in life that houses don't erect themselves. It's quantifiable and provable. It's rational and requires no leap of faith. Housing is a construct of humans, not any invisible friend because if it wasn't, we'd all still be sleeping outside. Now, when your doG shows up, shakes hands, hands me a beer and says "Hey, y'all want the tour?" I might have reason to believe. But then she wouldn't be an invisible friend any more, would she? So how do you think that we came to exist? If subscribe to the "big bang" theory, think about this; take a pocket watch smash it with a hammer. Now put it in a bag and shake it. Did all of the millions of pieces come together to create a working pocket watch? |
QUOTE |
In article <[Email Removed]>, SpaceGirl <[Email Removed]> wrote: so does morality, and the latter is a big part of all religions. The explain to me why: Muslims fly aircraft into buildings and blow up thousands of people. |
QUOTE |
Fundies murder physicians who perform abortions. |
QUOTE |
Catholic priests rape altar boys. |
QUOTE |
You call that morality? You have an interesting definition of morality. They pay a lot of LIP SERVICE to "morality," but when you get down to where the bear shits in the buckwheat, they use their so-called morality as a weapon, while not following their stated morality in their own lives. Hypocrisy, party of millions? |
QUOTE |
TheUnknownOne wrote: "Brian" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed]... Locutus wrote: Faith doesn't need proof. yes it does If man could "prove" or "explain" God and everything he has done, God wouldn't be worth worshipping. It's too much for us to even understand. So in that case why don't you believe in the Devil? Since we can't explain or prove the Devil either. I DO believe there is a Devil. |
QUOTE |
And then you guys inflict the rules, regulations and strictures [snip] |
QUOTE |
Faith doesn't need proof. Faith denies proof. |
QUOTE |
Brian wrote: TheUnknownOne wrote: "Brian" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed]... Locutus wrote: Faith doesn't need proof. yes it does If man could "prove" or "explain" God and everything he has done, God wouldn't be worth worshipping. It's too much for us to even understand. So in that case why don't you believe in the Devil? Since we can't explain or prove the Devil either. I DO believe there is a Devil. Please, do you have to discuss your gods failures? |
QUOTE |
Ben Measures wrote: Terri Schiavo's Feeding Tube wrote: Doing my best to be as offensive to fundies as possible. They deserve it. You claim fundies persecute gays for their views, and yet you persecute fundies for their views. You deserve exactly what you give. Not at all, because I would never presume to deny fundies employment |
QUOTE |
BTR1701 wrote: And then you guys inflict the rules, regulations and strictures [snip] And I met you when? Tell me, dates and places of when I personally did you grievance. |
QUOTE |
It's called the "general you". Familiarize yourself with the concept. |
QUOTE |
But you'd "do your best to be as offensive as possible" if they were under your employment? Do you really think that's any better? |
QUOTE |
Ben Measures <[Email Removed]> wrote: But you'd "do your best to be as offensive as possible" if they were under your employment? Do you really think that's any better? Don't be an ass, you ass. |
QUOTE |
I'm only just quoting you. To see yourself from somebody else's perspective is often very grounding. |
QUOTE |
BTR1701 wrote: It's called the "general you". Familiarize yourself with the concept. Only fools make generalisations based on race, colour or creed. |
QUOTE |
Ben Measures wrote: Only fools make generalisations based on race, colour or creed. I would have thought a system of principles and beliefs that a group of people subscribe to (i.e. a creed) would allow you to generalise about them a little bit. |
QUOTE |
What the Christian religon has is the books written two thousand or so years ago that make up the cannon of the Bible the old and new testament. |
QUOTE |
If there was no real boogy-man then the stories would not have started, right? |
QUOTE |
If there was no real boogy-man then the stories would not have started, right? There were actual "boogie men". The term comes from the spice trades in what is now Indonesia. The name comes from the Bugis (pronounced "boo" "geese") traders of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Very harsh pirates / traders that made a significant impact in the dangerous nature of the indonesian spice trades. There were many not-so-friendly encounters with these traders during the regions Dutch occupation and spice trades with the British, hence the passed down of lore of the "bugis man". - Dustin |
QUOTE |
If there was no real boogy-man then the stories would not have started, right? There were actual "boogie men". The term comes from the spice trades in what is now Indonesia. The name comes from the Bugis (pronounced "boo" "geese") traders of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Very harsh pirates / traders that made a significant impact in the dangerous nature of the indonesian spice trades. There were many not-so-friendly encounters with these traders during the regions Dutch occupation and spice trades with the British, hence the passed down of lore of the "bugis man". - Dustin |
QUOTE |
BTR1701 wrote: It's called the "general you". Familiarize yourself with the concept. Only fools make generalisations based on race, colour or creed. |
QUOTE |
Do they live in your closet or under your bed? Do they grab your feet as you step into bed at night? hahahaha. Does your "bugis man" live under your bed still? ":^) |
QUOTE |
On 2005-05-10 11:51:46 -0700, "Lon Chaney (Man of 1000 Faces)" <[Email Removed]> said: Do they live in your closet or under your bed? Do they grab your feet as you step into bed at night? hahahaha. Does your "bugis man" live under your bed still? ":^) You try and educate some people just a little, and look what happens.... Very sad. You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat... |
QUOTE |
You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat... geeeeesh. |
QUOTE |
You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat... geeeeesh. |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Brian at [Email Removed] wrote on 05/11/2005 5:05 AM: You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat... geeeeesh. You should have seen Brian when he found out that he does not control what is posted in a newsgroup. He got all pissy and started spinning. What a mess. Huh? Voicing opinions is now "controlling newsgroups"? Didn't know that, |
QUOTE |
fugitive wrote: in article [Email Removed], Brian at [Email Removed] wrote on 05/11/2005 5:05 AM: You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat... geeeeesh. You should have seen Brian when he found out that he does not control what is posted in a newsgroup. He got all pissy and started spinning. What a mess. Huh? Voicing opinions is now "controlling newsgroups"? Didn't know that, thanks for the info. |
QUOTE |
Good morning Clell; "Clell Harmon" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:B1Zfe.72082$WI3.21976@attbi_s71... Brian wrote: TheUnknownOne wrote: "Brian" <[Email Removed]> wrote in message news:[Email Removed]... Locutus wrote: Faith doesn't need proof. yes it does If man could "prove" or "explain" God and everything he has done, God wouldn't be worth worshipping. It's too much for us to even understand. So in that case why don't you believe in the Devil? Since we can't explain or prove the Devil either. I DO believe there is a Devil. Please, do you have to discuss your gods failures? Please elaborate on failures. Satan, the best of his angels, purportedly led a revolt against him. |
QUOTE |
Clell Harmon wrote: Faith doesn't need proof. Faith denies proof. That's one way of looking at it :) |
QUOTE |
SpaceGirl wrote: That's one way of looking at it :) It's the only way to look at it. If mere evidence would change a believers mind, they never REALLY believed in the first place. |
QUOTE |
In article <[Email Removed]>, "Raymond" <[Email Removed]> wrote: The problem with this is that if it did not happen, the Church never would have got started, as the people alive would have written that it was a lie. The fact is that in the location where it did happen, a church was built and thousand came to Jesus by faith. The same could be said of the Greek and Roman gods. (And every other religion as well.) |
QUOTE |
Are they all real, too? |
QUOTE |
he rose from the dead, and was seen by up to 500 people at one time. |
QUOTE |
Today about two Billion people say they are Christian. |
QUOTE |
in article [Email Removed], Brian at [Email Removed] wrote on 05/11/2005 11:41 AM: fugitive wrote: in article [Email Removed], Brian at [Email Removed] wrote on 05/11/2005 5:05 AM: You should have seen him when someone told him the earth wasn't flat... geeeeesh. You should have seen Brian when he found out that he does not control what is posted in a newsgroup. He got all pissy and started spinning. What a mess. Huh? Voicing opinions is now "controlling newsgroups"? Didn't know that, thanks for the info. You were reminded of your limitations and you did not like it. Move on. ??? |
QUOTE |
In article <[Email Removed]>, [Email Removed] wrote: Today about two Billion people say they are Christian. It's a horrifying thing to realize that two-thirds of the planet's population are so stupid and weak, that they need to believe in an invisible fairy in the sky. Furthermore, it's an equally horrifying thing that the leaders of this mass insanity are mostly pedophiles. |
QUOTE |
I am sure anyone can say such, only in Christ Jesus; he rose from the dead, and was seen by up to 500 people at one time. Sent days after his resurrection to give all that would not believe time to see and know God did raise him up from the dead. So a few days later Peter was able to baptized 3,000 people. Then only the Greek Orthodox church can say they still have the buildings and place where Jesus walked and preached, which even the Greeks and Roman gods could never say or any other religion, then I don't see why they would want to, as it would show they lied and not to be trusted. Today about two Billion people say they are Christian. |
QUOTE |
As for religions goes they are real, only false and not of the Creator God, that made mankind in the beginning. Lots of gods, and religions, only one true God and Saviour and that is Jesus the Christ the Saviour to all that accept His payment for sin, his blood on the cross, he gave his life so others may live eternal, then rose from the dead to prove he had the power to back up His promise. |
QUOTE |
its unfortunate that some have so little understanding of how things actually are as opposed to media hype and a self inflating ego that makes one unreceptive ......can it be you are missing something? |